[Bug middle-end/103406] [12 Regression] gcc -O0 behaves differently on "DBL_MAX related operations" than gcc -O1 and above

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103406

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
But I'm not sure what the stance is on the sign of NaNs