[Bug middle-end/103143] [12 Regression] ICE due to infinite recursion in pointer-query.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103143 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > But it does not fix: Sorry wrong bug.

[Bug tree-optimization/103121] [12 Regression] Warnings in cp/optimize.c causing build failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103121 --- Comment #15 from Martin Sebor --- The call is made from the strlen pass which still does apparently use EVRP. I believe Aldy's been moving it away from it (some of his changes are still pending) as have I, so things are still in flux. I do

[Bug target/99867] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in to_constant, at poly-int.h:504

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99867 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug target/99657] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99657 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 99867 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/102991] [12 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-17.c fails after r12-4757

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102991 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Xiong Hu Luo : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c877d1c30ef1c5145817805ab944cddea61ad54 commit r11-9231-g0c877d1c30ef1c5145817805ab944cddea61ad54 Author: Xionghu Luo Dat

[Bug target/102991] [12 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-17.c fails after r12-4757

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102991 luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/103144] New: vectorizer failed to recognize shift>>=1 in loop as shift>>i

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103144 Bug ID: 103144 Summary: vectorizer failed to recognize shift>>=1 in loop as shift>>i Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimizati

[Bug tree-optimization/102690] [12 regression] g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-16.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102690 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- It was backported here: g:19dcea67ac40cfdeb396fa264ebbe04fbe61fdc0

[Bug target/99657] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99657 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- The easiest way to fixing this is to call verify_type_context even for the decl with auto storage too and reject it then. I think I am going to do that.

[Bug bootstrap/102831] [12 regression] Spurious -Wparentheses etc. warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102831 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #6) If it's reliably reproducible (ideally with a cross), can you attach a translation unit and the options to use to reproduce it with?

[Bug target/103124] PPC: "mr" instruction is unnecessary when extending DI to V1TI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103124 --- Comment #2 from HaoChen Gui --- //lower-subreg.c /* If this is a cast from one mode to another, where the modes have the same size, and they are not tieable, then mark this register as non-decomposable. I

[Bug middle-end/103143] [12 Regression] ICE due to infinite recursion in pointer-query.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103143 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor

[Bug target/93453] PPC: rldimi not taken into account to avoid shift+or

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93453 HaoChen Gui changed: What|Removed |Added CC||guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/103124] PPC: "mr" instruction is unnecessary when extending DI to V1TI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103124 --- Comment #3 from HaoChen Gui --- My solution is to split the move (from TI to V1TI) into one vsx_concat_v2di and one V2DI to V1TI move. Thus, TI register 122 can be decomposed. (insn 12 11 17 2 (set (reg:V1TI 121 [ b ]) (subreg:V1TI

[Bug target/99657] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99657 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 51751 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51751&action=edit Patch which fixes the C side of things This is the start of the patch which will fix this. It fixes C front-en

[Bug c/103145] New: False positive of -Wstringop-overread on gcc-11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103145 Bug ID: 103145 Summary: False positive of -Wstringop-overread on gcc-11 Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug target/99657] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99657 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > Created attachment 51751 [details] > Patch which fixes the C side of things > > This is the start of the patch which will fix this. It fixes C front-end. > The

[Bug libstdc++/103146] New: [12 Regression] libstdc++-v3 bootstrap failure on 32-bit BE powerpc since r12-4952

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103146 Bug ID: 103146 Summary: [12 Regression] libstdc++-v3 bootstrap failure on 32-bit BE powerpc since r12-4952 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywo

[Bug tree-optimization/102232] Missed arithmetic fold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102232 navidrahimi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||navidrahimi at microsoft dot com --- Com

[Bug tree-optimization/102232] Missed arithmetic fold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102232 --- Comment #4 from navidrahimi --- This patch I attached will fix this problem and does include the test [1]. You can follow the discussion in GCC-Patches here [1]. Although it seems I still have problem to fix with MIME type of the patch in ma

[Bug c++/101748] ICE: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have vector_type in digest_init_r, at cp/typeck2.c:1206

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101748 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-09 Assignee|unassigne

[Bug c++/101748] ICE: tree check in digest_init_r with SVE vector type and extra {}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101748 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE: tree check: expected |ICE: tree check in |r

[Bug target/99657] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99657 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #51751|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/103147] New: ICE in register_tuple_type, at config/aarch64/aarch64-builtins.c:1313

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103147 Bug ID: 103147 Summary: ICE in register_tuple_type, at config/aarch64/aarch64-builtins.c:1313 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-v

[Bug tree-optimization/103148] New: ICE in vect_analyze_loop, at tree-vect-loop.c:3155

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103148 Bug ID: 103148 Summary: ICE in vect_analyze_loop, at tree-vect-loop.c:3155 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug target/103149] New: cc1: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103149 Bug ID: 103149 Summary: cc1: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug middle-end/103149] cc1: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103149 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/103147] [12 Regression] ICE in register_tuple_type with include "arm_neon.h" and -fpack-struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103147 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/103150] New: Structure return is not optimized on 32-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103150 Bug ID: 103150 Summary: Structure return is not optimized on 32-bit targets Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug tree-optimization/103121] [12 Regression] Warnings in cp/optimize.c causing build failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103121 --- Comment #16 from Aldy Hernandez --- > $3 = void > (gdb) n > 326 max = wi::to_wide (vr.max ()); > (gdb) p range_type > $4 = VR_RANGE > (gdb) p debug_tree(vr.min()) > > constant 1> > $5 = void > (gdb) p debug_tree(vr.max()) >

[Bug target/103150] Structure return is not optimized on 32-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103150 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- There is a few bugs filed about this same issue, See PR 101926 (this might be a dup of one of those).

[Bug fortran/103139] [12 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2573

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103139 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #1 from G.

[Bug tree-optimization/101636] [11/12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: conversion of register to a different size in 'view_convert_expr')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101636 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 8 Nov 2021, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101636 > > --- Comment #11 from Martin Liška --- > > I'm going to fix that (but it's spuriou

[Bug tree-optimization/103121] [12 Regression] Warnings in cp/optimize.c causing build failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103121 --- Comment #17 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #15) > accurate than with ranger. I also didn't realize that debug_ranger() didn't > show me the same ranges I get from a call range_of_expr(). Live and learn I W

[Bug target/103150] Structure return is not optimized on 32-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103150 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||99128 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug middle-end/102997] [12 Regression] 45% 454.calculix regression with LTO+PGO -march=native -Ofast on Zen since r12-4526-gd8edfadfc7a9795b65177a50ce44fd348858e844

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102997 --- Comment #28 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 8 Nov 2021, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102997 > > --- Comment #27 from Aldy Hernandez --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment

[Bug libstdc++/103146] [12 Regression] libstdc++-v3 bootstrap failure on 32-bit BE powerpc since r12-4952

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103146 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug libstdc++/103146] [12 Regression] libstdc++-v3 bootstrap failure on 32-bit BE powerpc since r12-4952

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103146 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/97821] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code with -ftree-vectorize at -O1 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu by r6-3608

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97821 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm, the trunk fails even with -fno-tree-vectorize -O1 :).

[Bug tree-optimization/101001] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101001 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.2.0 Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/100934] [9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 during unrolling since r9-6299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qrzhang at gatech dot edu --- Comment #

<    1   2   3