https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103121
--- Comment #17 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #15) > accurate than with ranger. I also didn't realize that debug_ranger() didn't > show me the same ranges I get from a call range_of_expr(). Live and learn I When I pointed you at it, I mentioned it was only a debugging aid you should use to look at for reference: "BTW, debug_ranger() tells you everything ranger would know for the given IL. It's meant as a debugging aid. You may want to look at it's source to see how it calls the ranger."
