https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102713
Bug ID: 102713
Summary: [12 regression] Several failures after r12-3273
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102714
Bug ID: 102714
Summary: A volatile-related problem cased by ipa inline pass
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102715
Bug ID: 102715
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_simplify_transpose, at
fortran/simplify.c:8184
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102716
Bug ID: 102716
Summary: ICE in gfc_validate_kind(): Got bad kind
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102717
Bug ID: 102717
Summary: ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at
fortran/simplify.c:6843
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102281
--- Comment #13 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 51593
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51593&action=edit
C++ source code
Third test case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101960
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100606
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0dd0905e2f59c1e8fc1597355f47afb53630cfc9
commit r11-9123-g0dd0905e2f59c1e8fc1597355f47afb53630cfc9
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101483
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58873a565898550893165427ccbef343f1390b9c
commit r11-9130-g58873a565898550893165427ccbef343f1390b9c
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101589
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d187dfbd038a9be68ceb81a6ce4125d50cb453f9
commit r11-9131-gd187dfbd038a9be68ceb81a6ce4125d50cb453f9
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101599
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e22db028743ff2f82c2aade4c8003e256ca15a6e
commit r11-9132-ge22db028743ff2f82c2aade4c8003e256ca15a6e
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100606
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:936194bc072ffd915d83f6a99a586b82cb7da75c
commit r10-10194-g936194bc072ffd915d83f6a99a586b82cb7da75c
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100387
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1335d35a530f31f60874cea1d5c98de81deed335
commit r10-10196-g1335d35a530f31f60874cea1d5c98de81deed335
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101483
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3e40f630f247d576c1534e5e8b40951d0b6ff517
commit r10-10201-g3e40f630f247d576c1534e5e8b40951d0b6ff517
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101589
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac987e1e9b7679c550e6a02a3a47737609cf1462
commit r10-10202-gac987e1e9b7679c550e6a02a3a47737609cf1462
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101599
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:55e6dca3090eb34ad9e48bdd7fc50e8ab376244e
commit r10-10203-g55e6dca3090eb34ad9e48bdd7fc50e8ab376244e
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101483
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101589
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101599
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100606
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100387
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100475
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100475
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.3|11.2
--- Comment #11 from Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100387
--- Comment #8 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #7)
> Fixed for GCC 10.4/11.3/12
For the record this fix is also present in 11.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100479
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100621
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102706
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Version|11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102713
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102697
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90787
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cec047eaeb3ca40be65500d140a3a3f16db742e1
commit r11-9133-gcec047eaeb3ca40be65500d140a3a3f16db742e1
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102048
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1dc688940ffade63452c8f9d80fd4b3204e5f40
commit r11-9134-ga1dc688940ffade63452c8f9d80fd4b3204e5f40
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100863
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:573c2ffd3cacde5c54605eb0d8b312d22594f7fa
commit r11-9139-g573c2ffd3cacde5c54605eb0d8b312d22594f7fa
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65816
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:573c2ffd3cacde5c54605eb0d8b312d22594f7fa
commit r11-9139-g573c2ffd3cacde5c54605eb0d8b312d22594f7fa
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100863
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10c0df1048fdb6404328d4966a3737d4f784c48f
commit r11-9140-g10c0df1048fdb6404328d4966a3737d4f784c48f
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100285
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b7e73951fd15f07946ff0c56f4e31b0006c621f9
commit r11-9141-gb7e73951fd15f07946ff0c56f4e31b0006c621f9
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102700
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98677
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I can reproduce it in a container using:
FROM ubuntu:20.04
RUN apt-get update
RUN echo 'tzdata tzdata/Areas select Europe' | debconf-set-selections
RUN echo 'tzdata tzdata/Zones/Europe select London' | deb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100285
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This is failing for aarch64-none-elf:
FAIL: experimental/net/headers.cc (test for excess errors)
Could you let me know what the error is please?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102657
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
it's missing a TAGS target, too, but I can handle that as part of this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-October/581485.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102700
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-12
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102718
Bug ID: 102718
Summary: gtype-desc.c function redefinition error for
gt_ggc_xxx (int_hash&)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93884
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102716
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102717
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102719
Bug ID: 102719
Summary: [12 regression]
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102720
Bug ID: 102720
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-strlen-1.c and
ldist-strlen-2.c fail after r12-4234
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100070
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101985
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by William Schmidt :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:76ba473b99c30ddec6171840a76292d6d4b67e7c
commit r12-4361-g76ba473b99c30ddec6171840a76292d6d4b67e7c
Author: Bill Schmidt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101985
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
Currently fixed on trunk. The parts of the fix that don't involve the new
builtin infrastructure should be backported to all releases after some burn-in
time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100070
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102325
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Many thanks for reporting this bug/issue. I've now git pushed changes which
have renamed all the gm2.exp driver scripts as distinct names.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102719
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/sse4_2-pcmpgtq.c (test for excess errors)
Also fails on power 8 & 9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102721
Bug ID: 102721
Summary: out-of-line member function definition fails to allow
lambda in unevaluated-context of new feature in c++20
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102721
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102721
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Confirmed,
> Here is a better example of what is going wrong:
> template
> struct A
> {
> void foo(const T){}
> };
>
> using t = decltype(+[]{})[3];
> u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102721
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102367
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101911
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fchelnokov at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 102367, which changed state.
Bug 102367 Summary: types can be defined in lambdas in unevaluated expression
(decltype/sizeof) in C++20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102367
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95384
--- Comment #4 from Barry Revzin ---
Here's another example of the same kind of issue
(https://godbolt.org/z/KWr9rMssj):
template
struct tagged_union {
tagged_union(T t) : index(0), a(t) { }
tagged_union(U u) : index(1), b(u) { }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102543
--- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu ---
I'm curious why we need peeling for unaligned access, because unaligned access
instructions should also be available for aligned addresses, can't we just mark
mem_ref as unaligned (although this is fake, just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101836
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-13
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102714
--- Comment #1 from Jeffle Xu ---
Some more detailed information about the effect to the application:
Linux kernel relies 'volatile' to do synchronization. Let's say, there are two
processes accessing one memory, one of them will write the memo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101836
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102720
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-13
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102713
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102658
--- Comment #6 from Kewen Lin ---
*** Bug 102713 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102706
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
case (2): Part of accesses are inbound, part of accesses are out of bound,
and after vectorization, the warning goes from out of bound line to
inbound line.
>From Wstringop-overflow-2.c:
struct A1 a1_1 = { 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102658
--- Comment #7 from Kewen Lin ---
r12-4273 caused some new expected failures:
FAIL: c-c++-common/Wstringop-overflow-2.c -Wc++-compat (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/Wstringop-overflow-2.c -std=gnu++14 (test for excess
errors)
FAI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102706
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
>From gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-51.c
void test_struct_char_vla_location (void)
{
unsigned nelts = 7;
struct {
char cvla[nelts]; // { dg-message "declared here|while referencing" }
} s;
s.cvla[0] = __
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102462
--- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu ---
case 1: All accesses are out of bound, and after vectorization, there are
some warnings missing.(Because there only 1 access after vectorization, 2
accesses w/o vectorization, and diagnostic is based on access
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102722
Bug ID: 102722
Summary: [Disgnostic]Xpass for gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-68.c
after O2 vectorization.
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102723
Bug ID: 102723
Summary: ICE in get_partitioning_class, at symtab.c:2092
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, lto
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101836
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||siddhesh at gotplt dot org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102723
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ipa |c++
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102723
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95686
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95686
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, lto
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100464
--- Comment #13 from Chengnian Sun ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> gcc has the -fcompare-debug option, which compiles twice, once with -g and
> once with -g -gtoggle and compares result, anything that fails with that
> option w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102658
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a124c1b0a2595f285c0d8ed863b37b83e14a6566
commit r12-4364-ga124c1b0a2595f285c0d8ed863b37b83e14a6566
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Wed Oct 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102658
--- Comment #9 from Kewen Lin ---
There are some discussions [1] to improve the fixing way for the test cases in
g++.dg and c-c++-common. So I hold the changes adding powerpc*-*-* onto them,
just updated the testcases under gcc.target/powerpc/.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102658
--- Comment #10 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #9)
> There are some discussions [1] to improve the fixing way for the test cases
> in g++.dg and c-c++-common. So I hold the changes adding powerpc*-*-* onto
> them, just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102658
--- Comment #11 from Kewen Lin ---
> > For the failure:
> > FAIL: libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-8.c scan-tree-dump-times graphite "5
> > loops carried no dependency" 1
> >
> > It's not a target specific failure, Hongtao already posted one p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102703
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102704
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102705
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102709
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102711
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
101 - 188 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
