[Bug tree-optimization/100499] Different results with -fpeel-loops -ftree-loop-vectorize options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499 --- Comment #18 from bin cheng --- Did some experiments, there are two fallouts after explicitly returning false for unsigned/wrapping types in MULT_EXPR/MINUS_EXPR/PLUS_EXPR. One is the mentioned use of multiple_of_p in number_of_iterations_ne

[Bug tree-optimization/100499] Different results with -fpeel-loops -ftree-loop-vectorize options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499 --- Comment #19 from bin cheng --- (In reply to bin cheng from comment #18) > Did some experiments, there are two fallouts after explicitly returning > false for unsigned/wrapping types in MULT_EXPR/MINUS_EXPR/PLUS_EXPR. One is > the mentioned

[Bug middle-end/99928] [OpenMP] reduction variable in combined target construct wrongly mapped as firstprivate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99928 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:780e5d4a2bac6eb7566c966a265961c99449cb55 commit r12-902-g780e5d4a2bac6eb7566c966a265961c99449cb55 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Wed

[Bug c++/100666] New: warning: ignoring return value of 'constexpr _Tp&& std::forward(typename std::remove_reference<_Tp>::type&) [with _Tp = std::nullptr_t; typename std::remove_reference<_Tp>::type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100666 Bug ID: 100666 Summary: warning: ignoring return value of 'constexpr _Tp&& std::forward(typename std::remove_reference<_Tp>::type&) [with _Tp = std::nullptr_t; typ

[Bug bootstrap/100654] trunk bootstrap errors with -O0 and -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100654 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |12.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biene

[Bug testsuite/100655] 'g++.dg/tsan/pthread_cond_clockwait.C' FAILs due to 'pthread_cond_clockwait' missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100655 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/100659] [11/12 Regression] ICE in supplement_binding_1, at cp/name-lookup.c:2702

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100659 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.2

[Bug target/100660] [11/12 Regression] ICE in visit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:2451

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100660 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.2 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/100667] New: std::tuple cannot be constructed from A&&, if A not defined (only forward declared)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100667 Bug ID: 100667 Summary: std::tuple cannot be constructed from A&&, if A not defined (only forward declared) Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug c/100661] [11/12 Regression] ICE in omp-low.c / refs_may_alias_p_2, at tree-ssa-alias.c:2460

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100661 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openmp Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/100668] New: Wrong warning highlight

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100668 Bug ID: 100668 Summary: Wrong warning highlight Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee

[Bug tree-optimization/100499] Different results with -fpeel-loops -ftree-loop-vectorize options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499 --- Comment #20 from Aldy Hernandez --- On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 8:31 AM rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499 > > --- Comment #17 from Richard Biener --- > (In reply to Andrew Macleod from co

[Bug middle-end/100669] New: [OpenACC] ICE with array-reduction variable & related issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100669 Bug ID: 100669 Summary: [OpenACC] ICE with array-reduction variable & related issues Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c/100670] New: unused attribute ignored on function definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100670 Bug ID: 100670 Summary: unused attribute ignored on function definition Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/100671] New: override-init suppressed in 'two shot' compilation when initializer macro/value is defined in system header file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100671 Bug ID: 100671 Summary: override-init suppressed in 'two shot' compilation when initializer macro/value is defined in system header file Product: gcc Version: 11

[Bug c++/100666] [9/10/11/12 Regression] warning: ignoring return value of 'constexpr _Tp&& std::forward(typename std::remove_reference<_Tp>::type&) [with _Tp = std::nullptr_t; ...]', declared with at

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100666 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.5.0, 8.3.0, 9.2.0 Ever confirme

[Bug c++/100666] [9/10/11/12 Regression] warning: ignoring return value of 'constexpr _Tp&& std::forward(typename std::remove_reference<_Tp>::type&) [with _Tp = std::nullptr_t; ...]', declared with at

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100666 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/100668] Wrong warning highlight

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100668 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/85468] Wrong location for -Wignored-qualifiers diagnostic on conversion operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85468 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||brahim.pro at protonmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/85468] Wrong location for -Wignored-qualifiers diagnostic on conversion operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85468 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2020-11-10 00:00:00 |2021-05-19 --- Comment #3 from Jonatha

[Bug libstdc++/100667] [11/12 Regression] std::tuple cannot be constructed from A&&, if A not defined (only forward declared)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100667 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/100671] override-init suppressed in 'two shot' compilation when initializer macro/value is defined in system header file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100671 --- Comment #1 from Jan Smets --- Another one we've had problems with is quite similar. The example below is a void function trying to return a value. #if 1 /* NULL defined in a system header file => warning in "one shot" compilation.

[Bug c/100670] unused attribute ignored on function definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100670 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Note btw that clang does not generate a warning: ... $ clang -c -Wall -O0 -g -Werror foo.c -DTYPE="void *" $ ... which means the attribute works, because if we remove the attribute we have instead: ... $ cla

[Bug middle-end/100669] [OpenACC] ICE with array-reduction variable & related issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100669 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-19 Keywords|ice-on-

[Bug target/83812] nvptx-run: error getting kernel result: operation not supported on global/shared address space

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83812 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/100671] override-init suppressed in 'two shot' compilation when initializer macro/value is defined in system header file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100671 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this is a dup of bug 99791.

[Bug fortran/100662] intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic fails on aarch, powerpc architectures on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 ripero84 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ripero84 at gmail dot com --

[Bug c/100670] unused attribute ignored on function definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100670 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org Ever conf

[Bug c++/100659] [11/12 Regression] ICE in supplement_binding_1, at cp/name-lookup.c:2702 since r11-5003-gd50310408f54e380

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100659 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-19 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/100660] [12 Regression] ICE in visit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:2451 since r12-110-gc54a9f7259fce1a2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100660 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE in |[12 Regression] ICE in

[Bug middle-end/100576] [11/12 Regression] ICE at -O1 and above: in decompose, at wide-int.h:984 since r11-2928-gd14c547abd484d35

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100576 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6683450f4a26dae7774be735a3429f48aee9565 commit r12-906-ge6683450f4a26dae7774be735a3429f48aee9565 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: We

[Bug middle-end/100576] [11 Regression] ICE at -O1 and above: in decompose, at wide-int.h:984 since r11-2928-gd14c547abd484d35

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100576 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE at |[11 Regression] ICE at -O1

[Bug rtl-optimization/100554] [9/10/11/12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure w/ -Os -fmodulo-sched -fno-tree-loop-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100554 Roman Zhuykov changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/83812] nvptx-run: error getting kernel result: operation not supported on global/shared address space

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83812 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge --- By the way, curious why this isn't caught at compile time ('ptxas' verification) but only at run time (CUDA Driver/PTX JIT).

[Bug tree-optimization/100672] New: wrong code with vector shift and unary minus

-gnu --with-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld --with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r12-905-20210519101846-ga73a5af281c-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/100672] wrong code with vector shift and unary minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100672 Zdenek Sojka changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.3.1, 11.1.1, 12.0,

[Bug c++/100673] New: [coroutines] Non-template, UDT await_suspend return-type results in ICE.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100673 Bug ID: 100673 Summary: [coroutines] Non-template, UDT await_suspend return-type results in ICE. Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c/100674] New: creation of alias symbols not used for optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100674 Bug ID: 100674 Summary: creation of alias symbols not used for optimization Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug driver/86030] specs file processing does not create response files for input directories

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86030 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2018-07-02 00:00:00 |2021-5-19 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan

[Bug middle-end/98109] Seemingly wrong warnings from -Wnonnull when combined with -O2 -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98109 James Legg changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jlegg at feralinteractive dot com --- Comm

[Bug c++/100675] New: std::string_view::find in constexpr function is not constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100675 Bug ID: 100675 Summary: std::string_view::find in constexpr function is not constant expression Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug libstdc++/100676] New: Redeclaring __failed_assertion() at every point of use of __glibcxx_assert breaks Clang CUDA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100676 Bug ID: 100676 Summary: Redeclaring __failed_assertion() at every point of use of __glibcxx_assert breaks Clang CUDA Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/100677] New: False positive unused-but-set-parameter warning when using VSX intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100677 Bug ID: 100677 Summary: False positive unused-but-set-parameter warning when using VSX intrinsics Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug tree-optimization/100672] wrong code with vector shift and unary minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100672 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Maybe sth is wrong with the testcase? clang also results in an abort. Isn't right-shift of negative values undefined? .original dumps ;; Function foo (null) ;; enabled by -tree-original { return VIE

[Bug tree-optimization/100672] wrong code with vector shift and unary minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100672 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/100672] wrong code with vector shift and unary minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100672 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.c b/gcc/fold-const.c index 419117dca3f..ef0d15a289d 100644 --- a/gcc/fold-const.c +++ b/gcc/fold-const.c @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ negate_expr_p (tree t) if (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPE

[Bug tree-optimization/100672] wrong code with vector shift and unary minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100672 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #5 from Richard Bi

[Bug middle-end/100672] wrong code with vector shift and unary minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100672 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/100672] wrong code with vector shift and unary minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100672 --- Comment #7 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Maybe sth is wrong with the testcase? clang also results in an abort. Isn't > right-shift of negative values undefined? > Thank you for having a look. I bel

[Bug middle-end/100672] wrong code with vector shift and unary minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100672 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #7) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > > Maybe sth is wrong with the testcase? clang also results in an abort. > > Isn't > > right-shift of negative v

[Bug middle-end/100672] wrong code with vector shift and unary minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100672 --- Comment #9 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8) > (In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #7) > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > > > Maybe sth is wrong with the testcase? clang also results in an

[Bug libstdc++/100676] Redeclaring __failed_assertion() at every point of use of __glibcxx_assert breaks Clang CUDA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100676 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-19 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/100672] wrong code with vector shift and unary minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100672 --- Comment #10 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #9) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8) > > (In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #7) > > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > > > > Maybe sth i

[Bug bootstrap/100654] trunk bootstrap errors with -O0 and -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100654 --- Comment #2 from Manfred Schwarb --- OK, then I will not report such issues in the future and use --disable-werror per default when using non-standard flags. Thanks.

[Bug bootstrap/100654] trunk bootstrap errors with -O0 and -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100654 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/100661] [11/12 Regression] ICE in omp-low.c / refs_may_alias_p_2, at tree-ssa-alias.c:2460

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100661 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/83812] nvptx-run: error getting kernel result: operation not supported on global/shared address space

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83812 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1467100fc72562a59f70cdd4e05f6c810d1fadcc commit r12-908-g1467100fc72562a59f70cdd4e05f6c810d1fadcc Author: Thomas Schwinge Date:

[Bug fortran/96983] [11/12 regression] ICE compiling gfortran.dg/pr96711.f90 starting with r11-3042

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug libstdc++/100630] Unexpected implicit conversion from volatile bool& to std::filesystem::path in gcc <= 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100630 --- Comment #5 from Romain Geissler --- Hi, Thanks for providing a fix that quickly ! I backported it in my own copy of gcc 8 and 9 and it fixed my issue on these branches as well. Cheers, Romain

[Bug target/100678] New: [OpenACC/nvptx] 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/private-atomic-1.c' FAILs (differently) in certain configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100678 Bug ID: 100678 Summary: [OpenACC/nvptx] 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/private-atomic-1.c' FAILs (differently) in certain configurations Product: gcc Version: 12.0

[Bug c++/100675] std::string_view::find in constexpr function is not constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100675 --- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 --- (In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #0) > The following code fails in 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3: > > https://godbolt.org/z/soGT9o4GY > > #include > > template > constexpr bool g() { > std::string_view s = " "; > s.find(

[Bug target/100678] [OpenACC/nvptx] 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/private-atomic-1.c' FAILs (differently) in certain configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100678 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #0) > At this point, it's (a) unclear whether the PR83812 restriction indeed is > supposed to be lifted for certain modern GPU hardware/SM levels/CUDA Driver > releas

[Bug testsuite/100658] Typos in dg commands and texi files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100658 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug testsuite/100658] Typos in dg commands and texi files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100658 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32bd0353db37af2cb023e575ed4ce8c944fd9dba commit r12-912-g32bd0353db37af2cb023e575ed4ce8c944fd9dba Author: Martin Liska Date: Wed

[Bug testsuite/100655] 'g++.dg/tsan/pthread_cond_clockwait.C' FAILs due to 'pthread_cond_clockwait' missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100655 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > It's not glibc-specific though, it's going to be in the next POSIX standard > and other C libraries. > > It's a bit of a hack, but you could include any libstd

[Bug c/100680] New: false positive warning for certain __builtin_memcmp() argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100680 Bug ID: 100680 Summary: false positive warning for certain __builtin_memcmp() argument Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/100680] false positive warning for certain __builtin_memcmp() argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100680 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC|

[Bug middle-end/100672] wrong code with vector shift and unary minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100672 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d51039cb7c807ed84ff7df5416a1e3ba07a5e63 commit r12-913-g8d51039cb7c807ed84ff7df5416a1e3ba07a5e63 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug middle-end/100672] wrong code with vector shift and unary minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100672 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|12.0| Known to work|

[Bug target/100678] [OpenACC/nvptx] 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/private-atomic-1.c' FAILs (differently) in certain configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100678 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge --- I ran into this in a different OpenACC context (OpenACC privatization levels), where in testcases we're trying to use 'atomic' on 'private' variables. ... which for nvptx offloading only works for gang-pr

[Bug libstdc++/100630] Unexpected implicit conversion from volatile bool& to std::filesystem::path in gcc <= 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100630 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wake

[Bug testsuite/100655] 'g++.dg/tsan/pthread_cond_clockwait.C' FAILs due to 'pthread_cond_clockwait' missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100655 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tsan/pthread_cond_clockwait.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tsan/pthread_cond_clockwait.C @@ -4,6 +4,10 @@ #include +// Include this to get the libstdc++ _GLIBCXX_USE_PTHREAD_CO

[Bug c++/100681] New: [[noreturn]] attribute can be applied to parameters of function type with strange results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100681 Bug ID: 100681 Summary: [[noreturn]] attribute can be applied to parameters of function type with strange results Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/99977] arm: ICE with __sync_bool_compare_and_swap and -mcpu=cortex-m23

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99977 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:beeb01541ae845b445837b873126a7f968b8f654 commit r12-922-gbeeb01541ae845b445837b873126a7f968b8f654 Author: Christophe Lyon Date:

[Bug target/99977] arm: ICE with __sync_bool_compare_and_swap and -mcpu=cortex-m23

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99977 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c412100235ba34ae9c133fb7a77cc52c2e93fc87 commit r11-8435-gc412100235ba34ae9c133fb7a77cc52c2e93fc87 Author: Christophe Lyo

[Bug target/100333] arm: ICE (unrecognizable insn) with CMSE nonsecure call and -march=armv8.1-m.main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100333 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alex Coplan : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b953740da1976d90d974055c6d825c509c6e654 commit r12-923-g5b953740da1976d90d974055c6d825c509c6e654 Author: Alex Coplan Date: Wed Ma

[Bug target/100333] arm: ICE (unrecognizable insn) with CMSE nonsecure call and -march=armv8.1-m.main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100333 --- Comment #3 from Alex Coplan --- Fixed on trunk for now.

[Bug target/97205] arm: Compiler fails with an ICE for -O0 on Trunk and GCC-10 for _Generic feature.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205 --- Comment #20 from SRINATH PARVATHANENI --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #17) > On Mon, 23 Nov 2020, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205 > > > > --- Comment #16 from

[Bug middle-end/99578] gcc-11 -Warray-bounds or -Wstringop-overread warning when accessing a pointer from integer literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbeulich at suse dot com --- Comment #13

[Bug middle-end/100680] false positive warning for certain __builtin_memcmp() argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100680 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |middle-end Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/100361] gcc-11 for msp430-elf fails to build: src/c++17/floating_to_chars.cc:107: d2fixed_full_table.h:1283:23: error: size of array ‘POW10_SPLIT_2’ exceeds maximum object size ‘32767’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100361 --- Comment #8 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke --- Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.

[Bug libstdc++/100682] New: Outdated manual about the debug mode using

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100682 Bug ID: 100682 Summary: Outdated manual about the debug mode using Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libst

[Bug fortran/100662] intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic fails on aarch, powerpc architectures on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 --- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 09:45:12AM +, ripero84 at gmail dot com wrote: > --- Comment #9 from ripero84 at gmail dot com --- > Steve, is this a GCC bug or a FreeBSD bug (or if it is something else, what > s

[Bug fortran/100683] New: Array initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 Bug ID: 100683 Summary: Array initialization refuses valid Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug target/97205] arm: Compiler fails with an ICE for -O0 on Trunk and GCC-10 for _Generic feature.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205 --- Comment #21 from Bernd Edlinger --- Hi Srinath, when we add new assertions to gcc we use always a gcc_checking_assert nowadays, that is also the case here. The assertion is only firing in your compiler because it is a development snapshot 1

[Bug libstdc++/100361] gcc-11 for msp430-elf fails to build: src/c++17/floating_to_chars.cc:107: d2fixed_full_table.h:1283:23: error: size of array ‘POW10_SPLIT_2’ exceeds maximum object size ‘32767’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100361 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- Nice, thanks, Joern. That patch is OK for trunk and gcc-11 (please remember to CC the libstdc++ list when you post it to gcc-patches).

[Bug middle-end/100684] New: spurious -Wnonnull with -O1 on a C++ lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100684 Bug ID: 100684 Summary: spurious -Wnonnull with -O1 on a C++ lambda Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: mi

[Bug libstdc++/100682] Outdated manual about the debug mode using

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100682 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/100684] spurious -Wnonnull with -O1 on a C++ lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100684 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.1.0, 12.0 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/98109] Seemingly wrong warnings from -Wnonnull when combined with -O2 -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98109 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to James Legg from comment #2) This is a different problem from the one reported in comment 0 so I opened a new bug for it: pr100684.

[Bug middle-end/100680] false positive warning for certain __builtin_memcmp() argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100680 --- Comment #3 from jbeulich at suse dot com --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2) > The warning is by design: it considers a constant non-null pointer value a > likely result of (invalid) arithmetic on a null pointer, as in the example

[Bug c++/89700] Warn if move constructor is not generated and not deleted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89700 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nunoplopes at sapo dot pt --- Comment

[Bug c++/87403] [Meta-bug] Issues that suggest a new warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403 Bug 87403 depends on bug 96501, which changed state. Bug 96501 Summary: [C++11] Should warn when classes only have copy constructor defined https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96501 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/96501] [C++11] Should warn when classes only have copy constructor defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96501 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #216 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2021-05-17 5:56 a.m., jvb at cyberscience dot com wrote: > With the working as, I changed gcc to use brl instructions for calls, > including > tail calls: > > --- gcc-11.1.0/gcc/config/ia64

[Bug fortran/96983] [11/12 regression] ICE compiling gfortran.dg/pr96711.f90 starting with r11-3042

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983 --- Comment #35 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #34 from Tobias Burnus --- > What's actually the status of the PR – I mean on both powerpc64*-linux-gnu, > sparc*-*-*. > > The summary states that there is an ICE – is thi

[Bug middle-end/100685] New: #pragma GCC push_options ineffective for optimize options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100685 Bug ID: 100685 Summary: #pragma GCC push_options ineffective for optimize options Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/100596] [12 Regression] error: attribute appertains to a friend declaration that is not a definition since r12-786-g149061188c7c6ddf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100596 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:adcb497bdba499d161d2e5e8de782bdd6f75d62c commit r12-925-gadcb497bdba499d161d2e5e8de782bdd6f75d62c Author: Marek Polacek Date: Tu

[Bug c++/100596] [12 Regression] error: attribute appertains to a friend declaration that is not a definition since r12-786-g149061188c7c6ddf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100596 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056053.html

  1   2   >