https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99961
Bug ID: 99961
Summary: requires clause rejects mentioning of function
parameters too early
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99927
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Ah, create_log_links wants to work like that.
> So, the bug seems to be that insn 108 has REG_DEAD (reg:CC 17 flags) note.
> It doesn't initially, but it is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99927
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #11)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> > Ah, create_log_links wants to work like that.
> > So, the bug seems to be that insn 108 has REG_DEAD (reg:C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920
--- Comment #11 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Swapping out those two .o files (individually and together) didn't yield a
successful build. I brought in the 8.4.0 .o files in one at a time and
eventually I got a successful build but at that p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99873
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99927
--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Yes, combine just drops that clobber of flags, that was a thinko :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90994
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Usually I'm trying to do binary search in these cases, build one tree with the
bad compiler, one with good one, cp -al one of the trees to a new dir, make a
list of the object files, start with half/half, co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92918
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a528594cf9a74e5a0fbac13ef673064ed73e1b89
commit r11-8033-ga528594cf9a74e5a0fbac13ef673064ed73e1b89
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92918
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52625
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99961
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92722
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 92722, which changed state.
Bug 92722 Summary: gcc considers "padding" byte of empty lambda to be
uninitialized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92722
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 92722, which changed state.
Bug 92722 Summary: gcc considers "padding" byte of empty lambda to be
uninitialized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92722
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99958
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99962
Bug ID: 99962
Summary: Error: unknown mnemonic `type' -- `type(_init)' for
crti.s, targetting aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99962
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
i manually replace the macros with code and it worrks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99958
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This seems to work:
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/pstl/glue_algorithm_defs.h
b/libstdc++-v3/include/pstl/glue_algorithm_defs.h
index 48bc56ae401..cef78e22e31 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/pstl/glue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99963
Bug ID: 99963
Summary: [concepts] template vs concept auto reports
ambiguous overload
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99964
Bug ID: 99964
Summary: android(bionic) cannot find crti.o and crtn.o
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93181
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-Wuninitialized fails to|[9/10/11 Regression]
|w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99964
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99965
Bug ID: 99965
Summary: segfault only happening with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99964
--- Comment #2 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #1)
> (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #0)
> > bionic simply does not provide crti.o and crtn.o
> > https://github.com/aosp-riscv/platform_bionic/tree/master/libc/arch-common
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99965
--- Comment #1 from Juan Lucas Rey ---
g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 7.3.1 20180303 (Red Hat 7.3.1-5)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99964
--- Comment #3 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #1)
> (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #0)
> > bionic simply does not provide crti.o and crtn.o
> > https://github.com/aosp-riscv/platform_bionic/tree/master/libc/arch-common
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99964
--- Comment #4 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #1)
> > (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #0)
> > > bionic simply does not provide crti.o and crtn.o
> > > https://github.com/aosp-ris
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99965
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99965
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41723
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99965
--- Comment #4 from Juan Lucas Rey ---
I get the error "cannot find -lubsan" with -fsanitize=alignment
g++ bug.cpp -o bug -O2 -ftree-loop-vectorize -fvect-cost-model && ./bug
this also reproduces the segfault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99965
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99965
--- Comment #6 from Juan Lucas Rey ---
I get the following with -fsanitize=alignment
bug.cpp:29:21: runtime error: store to misaligned address 0x02249044 for
type 'char *', which requires 8 byte alignment
0x02249044: note: pointer points
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99965
--- Comment #7 from Juan Lucas Rey ---
the thing is removing the vector m_vPointers makes it work. also this code
works fine on clang.. why would it be misaligned?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99536
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99536
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
The IL I posted in comment #6 was before the libstdc++ change.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99965
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Juan Lucas Rey from comment #7)
> the thing is removing the vector m_vPointers makes it work.
Just by accident.
> also this code works fine on clang.. why would it be misaligned?
Because pBuf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99960
--- Comment #1 from Alex Coplan ---
Looks like both loads and stores are wrong in V2DImode:
typedef long long __attribute((vector_size(16))) v2di;
v2di load(v2di *p) { return *p; }
void store(v2di *p, v2di v) { *p = v; }
gives:
load:
v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99806
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52625
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b40d45cb1930e9aa8a1f9a6a8728fd47ebeeaaac
commit r11-8034-gb40d45cb1930e9aa8a1f9a6a8728fd47ebeeaaac
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41723
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fb5ed6d8c90a4bf8e677a3ff9bd79d83636ccff9
commit r11-8035-gfb5ed6d8c90a4bf8e677a3ff9bd79d83636ccff9
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41723
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression] Error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52625
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99962
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99964
--- Comment #5 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #1)
> (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #0)
> > bionic simply does not provide crti.o and crtn.o
> > https://github.com/aosp-riscv/platform_bionic/tree/master/libc/arch-common
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.2.0, 11.0, 4.7.0, 4.8.4,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18635
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99806
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
A test that should be accepted:
// PR c++/99806
struct S {
template
void f(T) noexcept(B);
static constexpr bool B = true;
};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99966
Bug ID: 99966
Summary: Bounds check not eliminated by assert
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99951
--- Comment #2 from Feng Xue ---
Can we report error in verify_ssa() when a non-default SSA's defining statement
has NULL bb, which is always a case that the statement is removed somewhere?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99927
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
distribute_notes says
Any clobbers from i2 or i1 can only exist if they were added by
recog_for_combine.
which is not true apparently. But all of this code *does* depend
on that, it just doesn't ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99857
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99910
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
It looks like commit 41019bfae2673a818 / r11-8011 "libstdc++: Clarify
static_assert message" accidentally swept this under the carpet.
If I cut off the last word, " type", i.e. the second changed line ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94529
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90323
luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90323
--- Comment #9 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Then we could optimized it in match.pd
diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index 036f92fa959..8944312c153 100644
--- a/gcc/match.pd
+++ b/gcc/match.pd
@@ -3711,6 +3711,17 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FL
101 - 157 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
