https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92722
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The IL the warning works with is below. It shows an unconditional read of the uninitialized member array bytes so the warning behaves correctly. The warning does have suppression logic for empty types, including lambdas, but the test case copies the representation bytes of the object directly and there's nothing to avoid the warning then. So I don't think there's anything for us to do here. In static member function ‘static void noncopyable_function::trivial_direct_move(noncopyable_function*, noncopyable_function*) [with int N = 1]’, inlined from ‘noncopyable_function::noncopyable_function(noncopyable_function&&)’ at pr92722.C:32:31, inlined from ‘int main()’ at pr92722.C:43:40: pr92722.C:22:43: warning: ‘a.noncopyable_function::direct[0]’ is used uninitialized [-Wuninitialized] 22 | to->direct[i] = from->direct[i]; | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^ pr92722.C: In function ‘int main()’: pr92722.C:42:26: note: ‘a’ declared here 42 | noncopyable_function a([] {}); | ^ int main () { struct noncopyable_function b; struct noncopyable_function a; char _2; <bb 2> [local count: 1073741824]: # .MEM_7 = VDEF <.MEM_1(D)> a ={v} {CLOBBER}; # .MEM_8 = VDEF <.MEM_7> b ={v} {CLOBBER}; # VUSE <.MEM_8> _2 = a.direct[0]; <<< a.direct[0] is uninitialized # .MEM_9 = VDEF <.MEM_8> b.direct[0] = _2; <<< -Wuninitialized # .MEM_3 = VDEF <.MEM_9> noncopyable_function::~noncopyable_function (&b); # .MEM_4 = VDEF <.MEM_3> noncopyable_function::~noncopyable_function (&a); # .MEM_5 = VDEF <.MEM_4> a ={v} {CLOBBER}; # .MEM_6 = VDEF <.MEM_5> b ={v} {CLOBBER}; # VUSE <.MEM_6> return 0; }