https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98000
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98028
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||85316
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97703
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97847
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #13)
> The failures reported in Comment 11 still exist on master, though.
> Maybe it's too early to remove 11 from the regression list?
But that seem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98674
Bug ID: 98674
Summary: [10/11] Regression vectorizer failed for compilation
time alias
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98669
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98671
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
Seems so.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98669
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose ---
$ /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc -fsanitize=address crypt.c -lcrypt &&
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib ./a.out
sasWQy9ecMDEs
looks like this happens with a compiler configured with --enable-defaul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98671
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98669
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Based on the back-trace, it seems that:
1: x/i $pc
=> 0x7762ba4d <__interceptor_crypt(char*, char*)+125>:
jmp*0xdf55d(%rip)# 0x7770afb0
<_ZN14__interception10real_cryptE>
(gdb)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98673
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98167
--- Comment #10 from Hongtao.liu ---
A patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-December/561909.html
And record jakub comments in another thread
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 11:47:48AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98669
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Can you please also check:
$ ASAN_OPTIONS=verbosity=111 ./a.out
...
?
You may see something like this:
'==23512==AddressSanitizer: failed to intercept '???'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98669
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Klose ---
$ ASAN_OPTIONS=verbosity=111 ./a.out
==3598976==info->dlpi_name =info->dlpi_addr = 0x5653263c7000
==3598976==info->dlpi_name = linux-vdso.so.1info->dlpi_addr =
0x7fff7e8ed000
==3598976==info->dlpi_na
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98674
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98669
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
> '==3598976==AddressSanitizer: failed to intercept 'crypt'
> '==3598976==AddressSanitizer: failed to intercept 'crypt_r'
All right, this is the problem. Investigating now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98648
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98062
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|plugins |c++
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98065
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98088
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98092
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98167
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98118
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 |[coroutines] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98119
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98195
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98196
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98198
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98203
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98209
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98224
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98228
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98241
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98245
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98259
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-01-14
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98265
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98266
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98294
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98325
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98259
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98329
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98331
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98349
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Component|ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98351
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ipa |testsuite
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98352
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98355
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98439
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98440
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98463
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98537
--- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu ---
A patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/562904.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98648
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98439
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So shell we schedule another split pass for this case?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98533
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11 Regression] ICE:|[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98570
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98579
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98643
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, ra
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98644
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98646
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98671
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
For the same source code file, cppcheck finds these other very minor problems:
1.
trunk.git/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.c:1520:11: warning:inconclusive: Width
10 given in format string (no. 3) is smaller
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96372
akrl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||akrl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98660
--- Comment #2 from Gašper Ažman ---
Ivan: indeed, you could use a static cast, or a macro - you're literally just
changing the value category of the expression to its original one. The cast is
safe.
The reason Niebler and friends (including me)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98669
--- Comment #9 from Matthias Klose ---
The Debian GCC has a patch to make --as-needed the default. It looks like
gcc-10 then links to an a.out which is not linked against libcrypt. This seems
to work with gcc-9, but not with -10 and -11.
$ gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98669
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Maybe crypt/crypt_r wasn't intercepted before?
In any case, seems like self-inflicted problem, --as-needed by default is a
very bad idea.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98672
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96688
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f8762a2e8659c1db802ba001869085c1915498f
commit r11-6663-g8f8762a2e8659c1db802ba001869085c1915498f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98675
Bug ID: 98675
Summary: Accessing member of temporary outside its lifetime
allowed in constexpr function
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyword
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
--- Comment #3 from Matthew Whitehead ---
This is on an actual first generation i486DX 40MHz system I use to test for
code issues exactly like this case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98665
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> GCC should not compile this.
That's now PR c++/98675
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98676
Bug ID: 98676
Summary: gcc.target/i386/pr95021-1.c etc. FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98676
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
--- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #13)
>> The failures reported in Comment 11 still exist on master, though.
>> Maybe i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98670
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0efdc7b31c2aeb3b0414a838e90014172b87302f
commit r11-6664-g0efdc7b31c2aeb3b0414a838e90014172b87302f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98670
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98677
Bug ID: 98677
Summary: std::regex constructor triggers valgrind under clang++
with undefined sanitizer; possible use-after-move
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98678
Bug ID: 98678
Summary: 30_threads/future/members/poll.cc execution test FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98678
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||98676
--- Comment #16 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98676
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Summary|gcc.target/i386/p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98679
Bug ID: 98679
Summary: Four functions could be marked "const".
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyze
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96425
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 regression] |internal compiler error in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98680
Bug ID: 98680
Summary: Several 30_threads tests are flaky
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98680
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98679
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98674
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95693
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
there;s no language reason to zero init the base. It looks to me as if Alex's
change is compensating for a problem in the pic code he cites. Is that code
trying to make a PIC initializer for something that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98678
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98680
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-01-14
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98376
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98669
--- Comment #11 from Matthias Klose ---
anway, guarding --as-needed in the Debian patch. %{!fsanitize=*:--as-needed}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98228
--- Comment #10 from Marius Hillenbrand ---
I've traced back the failing gnat1 to gcc/ada/sem_type.adb. It looks like
during lto, ipa-modref data about that file causes misoptimizations, resulting
in the generated gnat1 to segfault and/or fail as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97684
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11 Regression] ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in
|reg_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98228
--- Comment #11 from Marius Hillenbrand ---
Created attachment 49965
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49965&action=edit
Reduced version of gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/md/atomic_compare_exchange-1.c
Reduced testcase which fa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98674
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98667
--- Comment #4 from Matthew Whitehead ---
It looks like /usr/bin/gdb 10.1 also has this opcode in it:
objdump -D /usr/bin/gdb | grep -B6 -A6 endbr32
60d7b5: 3f aas
60d7b6: 1a 3b sbb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98674
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
101 - 200 of 323 matches
Mail list logo