https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on| |98676
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to [email protected] from comment #15)
> > --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> > (In reply to [email protected] from comment #13)
> >> The failures reported in Comment 11 still exist on master, though.
> >> Maybe it's too early to remove 11 from the regression list?
> >
> > But that seems to be a new issue with the added testcases. Can you open a
> > separate PR for this?
>
> Done now as PR testsuite/98676. I was just a bit worried that the patch
> would be backported to the gcc-10 branch as is, together with the (so
> far ignored) failures.
Sure. We have dependencies to track this.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98676
[Bug 98676] gcc.target/i386/pr95021-1.c etc. FAIL
