https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95582
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98227
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98228
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
It builds for me:
https://build.opensuse.org/build/devel:gcc/SLE-12/s390x/gcc11/_log
Do you know what's the difference?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95582
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa4a8b6463e0dbc2a072fca835d28ae7a57849d5
commit r11-5925-gfa4a8b6463e0dbc2a072fca835d28ae7a57849d5
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98235
Bug ID: 98235
Summary: ice in decompose with -O3 -fallow-store-data-races
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98235
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-12-11
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98226
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Zaikin ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> Oh, but you didn't enable any optimization at all, so who cares about the
> performance?
Let me give the whole picture. The issue is very close to that from
http
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98228
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
you have:
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,go,d
--enable-checking=release
--disable-werror
--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/11
--enable-ssp
--disable-libssp
--disable-libvtv
--disable-ce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98226
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Zaikin ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> I've removed some redundant code from them, but not changed the indirection
> that this PR complains about. I don't plan to change that.
Thank you! I've got your
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrea Corallo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:499651e43854ea65303eb55324263c25256c9735
commit r11-5926-g499651e43854ea65303eb55324263c25256c9735
Author: Andrea Corallo
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98235
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Eh, so this is fully LSMed into a "PHI state machine" we try to vectorize.
Since the SLP discovery cache is not "permute aware" (thus it does not find
an existing SLP node for say {a, b} when looking for {b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95582
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98232
--- Comment #2 from Hussam Al-Tayeb ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Please provide preprocessed source of vcldemo.cxx and the G++ command-line
> options used as well as the host/target you are compiling on/for.
Can you please
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98232
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Run build system with in a verbose mode (V=1 or VERBOSE=1), or so.
And then for the problematic TU do -E, which will save pre-processed source
file instead of the object file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98190
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3e60ddeb8220ed388819bb3f14e8caa9309fd3c2
commit r11-5927-g3e60ddeb8220ed388819bb3f14e8caa9309fd3c2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98236
Bug ID: 98236
Summary: x plus/minus y cmp 0 produces unoptimal code
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98236
--- Comment #1 from denis.campredon at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 49734
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49734&action=edit
assemble generated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98222
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95768
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98233
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98236
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
This is likely because we expand from
int bar (int x, int y)
{
int _6;
[local count: 1073741824]:
if (x_2(D) != y_3(D))
goto ; [48.88%]
else
goto ; [51.12%]
[local count: 524845000]:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98236
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98235
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fc7b4248172561a9ee310e2d43d8a485a5c9e108
commit r11-5928-gfc7b4248172561a9ee310e2d43d8a485a5c9e108
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98235
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98234
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98226
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Oleg Zaikin from comment #6)
> When we switched from C++17-based g++ to C++20-based g++, the performance of
> the whole program decreased by about 7 %. It turned out that the main reason
> is t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98226
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The generated code hasn't changed between gcc-10 and gcc-11 though, so the
difference must be in the code used to run the benchmarks, not the code under
test.
See https://godbolt.org/z/bWeMen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98226
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97941
Matthew Malcomson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98229
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1423318fa778649365f5a73c2c4657733e191820
commit r11-5929-g1423318fa778649365f5a73c2c4657733e191820
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98190
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98229
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98237
Bug ID: 98237
Summary: gcc-dg-lto-modref-3-01.exe etc. FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98237
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98238
Bug ID: 98238
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-1.c etc. FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98238
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98238
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 49735
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49735&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 vect-cost-model-1.c.166t.vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98227
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Please try:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-December/561484.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98239
Bug ID: 98239
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-69.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98239
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98239
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 49736
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49736&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 bb-slp-69.c.178t.slp2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98240
Bug ID: 98240
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/pr97678.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98240
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98239
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98240
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 49737
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49737&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 pr97678.c.166t.vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98239
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:955af69b7376ebd05051c02455d71c90258f5e24
commit r11-5930-g955af69b7376ebd05051c02455d71c90258f5e24
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97494
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build|powerpc64*-linux-gnu|
Target|powerpc64*-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98239
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98226
--- Comment #11 from Oleg Zaikin ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> That needs to be investigated, but it's a problem with the compiler. It has
> nothing to do with countr_one being implemented using countr_zero (as shown
> by th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98237
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
It's not just the scans that fail:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/modref-3 c_lto_modref-3_0.o-c_lto_modref-3_1.o execute -O2
-flto-partition=max -fdump-ipa-modref -fno-ipa-sra -fno-ipa-cp -flto
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/modref-4 c_l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98226
--- Comment #12 from Oleg Zaikin ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #10)
> But why you are trying to use a more complex branchy expression in C++17
> mode when you already have a more efficient expression as a "fallback"?
>
> Note t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98241
Bug ID: 98241
Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/pr78973.c XPASSes
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98240
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Summary|gcc.dg/vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98241
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96685
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98240
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0fc3bf781d15a9fa260395bd72472224f42e3ce1
commit r11-5931-g0fc3bf781d15a9fa260395bd72472224f42e3ce1
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98240
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98242
Bug ID: 98242
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-3.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98242
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98242
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 49738
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49738&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 bb-slp-subgroups-3.c.178t.slp2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98242
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98243
Bug ID: 98243
Summary: gcc.dg/gomp/simd-2.c etc. FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98243
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98242
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b488a2e695b6868cfb69c65b8e2943ea31c335c
commit r11-5932-g4b488a2e695b6868cfb69c65b8e2943ea31c335c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98242
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98243
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 49739
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49739&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 simd-2.c.166t.vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98226
Oleg Zaikin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98244
Bug ID: 98244
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/vect-live-6.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98244
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98244
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 49740
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49740&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 vect-live-6.c.166t.vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98245
Bug ID: 98245
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-46.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98245
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98245
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 49741
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49741&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 bb-slp-46.c.244t.optimized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98244
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98244
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab231af9ccd61b9b05ad35c04a79b32343904209
commit r11-5933-gab231af9ccd61b9b05ad35c04a79b32343904209
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98244
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98245
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96685
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 49742
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49742&action=edit
gcc11-pr96685.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96685
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, there is some canonicalization problem GENERIC vs. GIMPLE:
unsigned
f1 (unsigned x, unsigned y)
{
unsigned int r = (x - y);
return ~r;
}
unsigned
f2 (unsigned x, unsigned y)
{
unsigned int r =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97694
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326
--- Comment #18 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Why is it correct to convert the double x to single precision here?!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96685
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ok, so for GENERIC it seems to be the associate: in fold_binary_loc that
converts
~x + y created by this patch into (y - x) + 1, and we don't have an equivalent
for that in GIMPLE.
So, shall I restrict this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97694
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97723
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Please see PR97694 for a patch that fixes both PRs at once.
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #18)
> Why is it correct to convert the double x to single precision here?!
For
float foo(float f, float x, float y) {
return (fabs(f)*x+y);
}
it is not unles
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78173
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:958d42abdf1a1936d290aab126cebd6bb4a52361
commit r11-5936-g958d42abdf1a1936d290aab126cebd6bb4a52361
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78173
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 78173, which changed state.
Bug 78173 Summary: Hard error subtracting pointers to incomplete type in SFINAE
context
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78173
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:078c7498908d9b74caff34d12099b5c85470e277
commit r11-5939-g078c7498908d9b74caff34d12099b5c85470e277
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Wed Dec 9 18:1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98246
Bug ID: 98246
Summary: [11 Regression] Linux kernel build fails after
6fbec038f7a7
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98246
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96272
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98246
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98146
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98146
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95768
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Sort of. Richard has some objections that we never resolved but but I'm still
planning to dust it off and resubmit it in some form for GCC 11 with the
corresponding C front end changes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
--- Comment #9 from Alex Coplan ---
Thanks for fixing this Andrea! FWIW I can reproduce the ICE with the same
testcase and options on the head of the GCC 10 branch (contrary to my first
message).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98247
Bug ID: 98247
Summary: gcc analyzer does not detect Flexible Array Member
misuse
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
