[Bug rtl-optimization/89310] Poor code generation returning float field from a struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89310 luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug c/96275] New: Vectorizer doesn't take into account bitmask condition from branch conditions.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96275 Bug ID: 96275 Summary: Vectorizer doesn't take into account bitmask condition from branch conditions. Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug c/96275] Vectorizer doesn't take into account bitmask condition from branch conditions.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96275 --- Comment #1 from Witold Baryluk --- FYI. clang trunk 12 / 76a0c0ee6ffa9c38485776921948d8f930109674, doesn't do that either: fillArray: # @fillArray testdil, 31 jne .LBB0_8 test

[Bug testsuite/96276] New: new test case c-c++-common/pr95237-6.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96276 Bug ID: 96276 Summary: new test case c-c++-common/pr95237-6.c fails Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tests

[Bug fortran/96277] New: optional argument + openmp fails in gfortran v10.1.0 with "argument not specified in enclosed parallel"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96277 Bug ID: 96277 Summary: optional argument + openmp fails in gfortran v10.1.0 with "argument not specified in enclosed parallel" Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug c++/96278] New: three-way comparison operator comparison to 0: spurious nullptr warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96278 Bug ID: 96278 Summary: three-way comparison operator comparison to 0: spurious nullptr warning Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/96279] New: build failure: floating_from_chars.cc:310:22: error: '__builtin_isinf_sign' is not a member of 'std'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96279 Bug ID: 96279 Summary: build failure: floating_from_chars.cc:310:22: error: '__builtin_isinf_sign' is not a member of 'std' Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/96262] [11 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2280 with -O -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96262 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||crazylht at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 f

[Bug c++/96278] three-way comparison operator comparison to 0: spurious nullptr warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96278 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||95242 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug target/96262] [11 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2280 with -O -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96262 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu --- 2268inline wi::storage_ref 2269wi::int_traits ::decompose (HOST_WIDE_INT *, 2270unsigned int precision, 2271const rtx_mode_t &x) 2

[Bug c++/96278] three-way comparison operator comparison to 0: spurious nullptr warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96278 --- Comment #2 from DV Henkel-Wallace --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I think this is a dup of bug 95242. Could be: I'm not sure if Jason's change applies only to synthesized comparators or not (that was the case described in 9

[Bug middle-end/96192] tree-inline.c(copy_decl_for_dup_finish) should preserve decl alignment in copy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96192 Sunil Pandey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||skpgkp2 at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 f

[Bug fortran/96255] [F2018] Implement optional type spec for index in DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255 --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #6) > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 07:44:16PM +, jvdelisle at charter dot net wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255 > > > > --- Comment

[Bug target/95237] LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT shrinks alignment, FAIL gcc.target/i386/pr69454-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237 --- Comment #23 from Sunil Pandey --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #20) > This bug has prevented the successful compilation of the local > Linux kernel for just over a month now. > > If I can assist with any testing, please let me k

[Bug target/96273] ice in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294, unrecognizable insn:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96273 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug target/96273] ice in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294, unrecognizable insn:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96273 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/96277] optional argument + openmp fails in gfortran v10.1.0 with "argument not specified in enclosed parallel"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96277 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- On the trunk this has been fixed in PR94672 r11-271 fix, and can't reproduce on current 10 branch either.

[Bug fortran/96277] optional argument + openmp fails in gfortran v10.1.0 with "argument not specified in enclosed parallel"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96277 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/94672] [10/11 Regression] gfortran/OpenMP chokes on PRESENT(array) despite of SHARED(array): Error: ‘array’ not specified in enclosing ‘parallel’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94672 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.price at monash dot edu --- Comme

<    1   2