https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96278
--- Comment #2 from DV Henkel-Wallace <gu...@henkel-wallace.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I think this is a dup of bug 95242. Could be: I'm not sure if Jason's change applies only to synthesized comparators or not (that was the case described in 95242 and was the second case I mentioned). I hope it is already fixed. However the test case I submitted is the user-supplied 0 literal per the standard the standard, not a synthetic case. So might or might not be; I no longer grok the gcc internals so can't tell myself. Thanks -d
