[Bug ipa/95859] [10/11 regression] Statically true asserts not recognized as such with -O2, but with -O1, -Og, -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95859 Tobias Schlüter changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Statically true asserts not |[10/11 regression] |

[Bug ipa/95859] [10/11 regression] Statically true asserts not recognized as such with -O2, but with -O1, -Og, -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95859 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Schlüter --- Added the regression tag to the title.

[Bug tree-optimization/92860] [8/9/10/11 regression] Global flags affected by -O settings are clobbered by optimize attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860 --- Comment #39 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #38) > JFTR I can easily reproduce it e.g. in the following setup: > > % powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu-gcc-11.0.0 -mcpu=power9 -c > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/target-at

[Bug inline-asm/96081] changed placement of file scope asm() contents

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96081 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Last recon

[Bug c++/96082] [9/10/11 Regression] GCC rejects the template disambiguator with "typename"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96082 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4 Summary|GCC rejects the

[Bug fortran/96087] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1575

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96087 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/96090] Inconsistent querying of differring exception specifications of explicitly defaulted functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96090 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug c++/96063] [10/11 Regression] mismatched-tags warnings in stdlib headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96063 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- What's wrong with checking the return value of warning_at as in the patch in comment 8?

[Bug tree-optimization/96091] ICE during dom: tree check: expected integer_cst, have poly_int_cst in to_wide, at tree.h:5911

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96091 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/95980] ICE in get_unique_type_string, at fortran/class.c:485

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95980 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Tests finished, the patch fixes both pr86551 and pr95980, but not more AFAICT. > That was on Darwin, right? Yes

[Bug tree-optimization/96091] ICE during dom: tree check: expected integer_cst, have poly_int_cst in to_wide, at tree.h:5911

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96091 --- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Why should we not have a VECTOR_CST of POLY_INT_CST elements? If > POLY_INT_CST > is not "constant" then it shouldn't be tcc_constant? Looks lik

[Bug tree-optimization/95396] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops since r8-6511-g3ae129323d150621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95396 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Creating dr for arr_26[_5] analyze_innermost: success. base_address: &arr_26 offset from base address: (ssizetype) ((sizetype) (char) _3 * 2) constant offset from base address: -482

[Bug ipa/96059] ICE: in remove_unreachable_nodes, at ipa.c:575 with -fdevirtualize-at-ltrans

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96059 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-07 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/96015] [10/11 Regression] gcc-10.1.0 miscompiles Python on hppa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96015 --- Comment #34 from Eric Botcazou --- > Eric, thoughts? Another possibility would be to remove the problematic barriers during the barriers pass that is run just before reorg: /* Some old code expects exactly one BARRIER as the NEXT_INSN of a

[Bug tree-optimization/95396] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops since r8-6511-g3ae129323d150621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95396 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- One odd thing is that for unsigned char _3 we get via wide_int var_min, var_max; value_range_kind vr_type = get_range_info (tmp_var, &var_min,

[Bug tree-optimization/96049] basepoints/gcc-11-1649-gd2adb79eac66 crashes on building 416.gamess with -O3 -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96049 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- > Martin - do we have aarch64 spec testing set up somewhere? Not anymore. I turned if off as it's a SLE-12 machine where we don't a have a recent enough GCC to build current master. Moreover, the test results

[Bug gcov-profile/96092] Should --coverage respect -ffile-prefix-map?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96092 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/95396] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops since r8-6511-g3ae129323d150621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95396 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > One odd thing is that for unsigned char _3 we get via > > wide_int var_min, var_max; > value_range_kind vr_type = get_range_inf

[Bug fortran/96087] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1575

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96087 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/96082] [9/10/11 Regression] GCC rejects the template disambiguator with "typename"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96082 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/96078] [10/11 Regression] flatten attribute on constructor and destructor causes spurious warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96078 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/96073] [11.0 regression] regression in gfc_format_decoder

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96073 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug inline-asm/96081] changed placement of file scope asm() contents

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96081 --- Comment #2 from jbeulich at suse dot com --- I wasn't even aware of -fno-toplevel-reorder, this suffices as a workaround here. Thanks. If nevertheless you're still interested in a testcase, please let me know; for the moment I'll assume this

[Bug c/96093] New: __MATHCALLX Error with ';' missing in header file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96093 Bug ID: 96093 Summary: __MATHCALLX Error with ';' missing in header file Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla (i.e. Firefox) with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #22

[Bug inline-asm/96081] changed placement of file scope asm() contents

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96081 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 7 Jul 2020, jbeulich at suse dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96081 > > --- Comment #2 from jbeulich at suse dot com --- > I wasn't even aware of -fno-topleve

[Bug tree-optimization/96075] [8/9/10 Regression] bogus alignment for negative step grouped access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96075 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d535ca86a548b76384f3687e1d46677cb652bdb commit r10-8433-g7d535ca86a548b76384f3687e1d46677cb652bdb Author: Richard Biener

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla (i.e. Firefox) with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 --- Comment #221 from Martin Liška --- For the chromium with GCC 10, inliner starts after ~5 minutes, so it's very likely inliner that takes so long.

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla (i.e. Firefox) with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 --- Comment #222 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #221) > For the chromium with GCC 10, inliner starts after ~5 minutes, so it's very > likely inliner that takes so long. 45.07% libc-2.31.so [.] __memset_avx2_erms

[Bug fortran/96030] AArch64: Add an option to control 64bits simdclone of math functions for fortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96030 --- Comment #3 from Bu Le --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > The directive should be doing what > #pragma omp declare simd > does on the target and it is an ABI decision what exactly it does. Hi,I am still confused about your comm

[Bug fortran/96085] ICE in gfc_finish_var_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:694

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96085 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/96058] ICE in c_getstr at gcc/fold-const.c:15475

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96058 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- So the corrupted STRING_CST is created in LTRANS here: gcc/expr.c: │11714 if (TREE_CODE (init) == CONSTRUCTOR && initializer_zerop (init)) │11715 {

[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Reduced test (provided t.mod exists) submodule (t) ts contains module procedure bp(s) ! end procedure bp end submodule ts end pr93423_red.f90:5:19: 5 | module procedure bp(s) |

[Bug ipa/96059] ICE: in remove_unreachable_nodes, at ipa.c:575 with -fdevirtualize-at-ltrans

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96059 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 48841 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48841&action=edit Reduced test-case $ g++ -O2 -flto=auto -fdevirtualize-at-ltrans -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden

[Bug libstdc++/96042] Reference type of std::ranges::iota is __int128 with -std=c++2a?!

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96042 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-07 Status|RESOLVED

[Bug debug/95574] line table entry in sequence with address after sequence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95574 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #2) > Created attachment 48702 [details] > _absvsi2_s.c > > To reproduce: > ... > $ gcc -O2 -g -fpic -mlong-double-80 -fcf-protection -mshstk > -fbuilding-libgcc -fno-st

[Bug debug/95574] line table entry in sequence with address after sequence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95574 --- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries --- This seems to be var-track related. Before var-track we have: ... (debug_insn 23 41 24 5 (debug_marker) "test2.c":12:5 -1 (nil)) (call_insn 24 23 25 5 (call (mem:QI (symbol_ref:DI ("abort") [flags 0x41]

[Bug fortran/95947] PACK intrinsic returns blank strings when an allocatable character array with allocatable length is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95947 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-07 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/45337] gfortran accepts pointer initialization of DT dummy arguments w/ INTENT(OUT)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45337 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc do

[Bug inline-asm/96081] changed placement of file scope asm() contents

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96081 --- Comment #4 from jbeulich at suse dot com --- Turns out I was wrong here, and the re-ordering was done even by older than gcc 9. The move from 9.2 to 9.3 also included a move to a newer gas, which made the issue noticable. Feel free to close a

[Bug tree-optimization/96094] New: Failure to optimize bool division

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96094 Bug ID: 96094 Summary: Failure to optimize bool division Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimizatio

[Bug debug/95574] line table entry in sequence with address after sequence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95574 --- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries --- A simple way of fixing this is: ... diff --git a/gcc/var-tracking.c b/gcc/var-tracking.c index 899a5c0290d..4b143f6702b 100644 --- a/gcc/var-tracking.c +++ b/gcc/var-tracking.c @@ -6635,7 +6635,7 @@ add_with_s

[Bug fortran/93423] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE on invalid with argument list for module procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93423 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug inline-asm/96081] changed placement of file scope asm() contents

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96081 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/95574] line table entry in sequence with address after sequence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95574 --- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries --- A bit more subtle: ... diff --git a/gcc/var-tracking.c b/gcc/var-tracking.c index 899a5c0290d..f94eb38f797 100644 --- a/gcc/var-tracking.c +++ b/gcc/var-tracking.c @@ -8880,6 +8880,10 @@ emit_note_insn_var_loc

[Bug tree-optimization/96094] Failure to optimize bool division

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96094 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/95675] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_over_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95675 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking CC|

[Bug c++/95675] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_over_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95675 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5

[Bug c++/96095] New: decltype((r)) inside of lambda with copy capture gives wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96095 Bug ID: 96095 Summary: decltype((r)) inside of lambda with copy capture gives wrong type Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/94260] Specific friend function inside c++20 concept-constrained class template triggers 'not usable in a constant expression' error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94260 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/95038] Not treating function result name as a variable.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95038 Arjen Markus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arjen.markus895 at gmail dot com --- Com

[Bug tree-optimization/96049] basepoints/gcc-11-1649-gd2adb79eac66 crashes on building 416.gamess with -O3 -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96049 Maxim Kuvyrkov changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug c++/96095] decltype((r)) inside of lambda with copy capture gives wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96095 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ke

[Bug c++/96096] New: g++-10.1 silently ignores function violating const instead of refusing to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96096 Bug ID: 96096 Summary: g++-10.1 silently ignores function violating const instead of refusing to compile Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug c++/95789] [10/11 Regression] Const method is allowed to return non-const reference on template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95789 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||agadethrowaway at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug c++/96096] g++-10.1 silently ignores function violating const instead of refusing to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96096 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/96097] New: ICE in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:26326

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96097 Bug ID: 96097 Summary: ICE in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:26326 Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/96097] ICE in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:26326

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96097 --- Comment #1 from Michael Bruck --- trunk: internal compiler error: in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:26326 10.1: internal compiler error: in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:26343

[Bug c++/96063] [10/11 Regression] mismatched-tags warnings in stdlib headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96063 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor

[Bug testsuite/96098] New: [11 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr68892.c fails since r11-205

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96098 Bug ID: 96098 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr68892.c fails since r11-205 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/96099] New: ICE in gfc_validate_kind, at fortran/trans-types.c:773

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96099 Bug ID: 96099 Summary: ICE in gfc_validate_kind, at fortran/trans-types.c:773 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug fortran/96100] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14638

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96100 Bug ID: 96100 Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14638 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/96101] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2398

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96101 Bug ID: 96101 Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2398 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/96087] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1575

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96087 --- Comment #3 from G. Steinmetz --- Thanks for nailing down the commit for addon comment 1. But when started the regression/issue from comment 0 ? gfortran 9.3 does not have the ICE.

[Bug c++/96063] [10/11 Regression] mismatched-tags warnings in stdlib headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96063 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f9c9ea40a1e937ea1b549625cf7762d4a8a2078 commit r11-1899-g6f9c9ea40a1e937ea1b549625cf7762d4a8a2078 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Tue

[Bug fortran/95980] ICE in get_unique_type_string, at fortran/class.c:485

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95980 --- Comment #14 from G. Steinmetz --- > ... and real programmers wrote fine Fortran programs. Yeah, optimal world. That's probably the reason why some "real" programs don't need test cases - or at most three, because they cover everything ;-)

[Bug fortran/96102] ICE in check_host_association, at fortran/resolve.c:5994

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96102 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #1 from G

[Bug fortran/96102] New: ICE in check_host_association, at fortran/resolve.c:5994

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96102 Bug ID: 96102 Summary: ICE in check_host_association, at fortran/resolve.c:5994 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c++/96063] [10/11 Regression] mismatched-tags warnings in stdlib headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96063 --- Comment #13 from Martin Sebor --- Jon, is there anything else to do here or can we resolve this as fixed?

[Bug fortran/96099] ICE in gfc_validate_kind, at fortran/trans-types.c:773

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96099 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Confirmed before r11-1337, but r11-1810 (instrumented) and r11-1864 (+patches) do not give the ICE.

[Bug fortran/96099] ICE in gfc_validate_kind, at fortran/trans-types.c:773

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96099 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-07 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/96103] New: Unclear diagnostic for a function return with "decltype(auto)"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96103 Bug ID: 96103 Summary: Unclear diagnostic for a function return with "decltype(auto)" Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic

[Bug fortran/96099] ICE in gfc_validate_kind, at fortran/trans-types.c:773

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96099 --- Comment #2 from G. Steinmetz --- Oh yes, of course ... a silly cut and paste thing. It has to be : $ cat z1.f90 program p implicit class(t) (1) type t end type end $ cat z2.f90 program p integer n1 parameter (n1 = 1) imp

[Bug tree-optimization/96058] ICE in c_getstr at gcc/fold-const.c:15475

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96058 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- The stack trace in comment #0: during GIMPLE pass: strlen ../../chrome/browser/ui/views/sharing/sharing_icon_view.cc: In member function ‘GetVectorIconBadge’: ../../chrome/browser/ui/views/sharing/sharing_ico

[Bug fortran/96100] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14638

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96100 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/96058] ICE in c_getstr at gcc/fold-const.c:15475

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96058 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug fortran/96084] ICE in free_expr0, at fortran/expr.c:446

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96084 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-07 Status

[Bug fortran/96041] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 after r11-1792

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96041 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7) > f951`gfc_resolve_formal_arglist(proc=0x00014301fbb0) at resolve.c:313:18 > frame #2: 0x0001000eb283 Setting a breakpoint here and i

[Bug fortran/93337] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_dt_upper_string, at fortran/module.c:441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93337 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ed54352ccfc3f0ec6c14e61035a78d06d5d44194 commit r9-8724-ged54352ccfc3f0ec6c14e61035a78d06d5d44194 Author: Harald Anlauf Dat

[Bug fortran/93337] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_dt_upper_string, at fortran/module.c:441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93337 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSI

[Bug c++/96103] Unclear diagnostic for a function return with "decltype(auto)"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96103 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/96085] ICE in gfc_finish_var_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:694

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96085 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/95303] [concepts] Member type of class template is incorrectly printed in diagnostics when it fails to satisfy a concept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95303 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9845b7b45621e3833aee47276cb111e43be0e48b commit r11-1903-g9845b7b45621e3833aee47276cb111e43be0e48b Author: Patrick Palka Date: Tu

[Bug c++/95303] [concepts] Member type of class template is incorrectly printed in diagnostics when it fails to satisfy a concept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95303 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/96085] ICE in gfc_finish_var_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:694

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96085 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) That one produces a strange regression with pr50392.f. Patch that regtests fine: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c index 223de91.

[Bug fortran/95980] ICE in get_unique_type_string, at fortran/class.c:485

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95980 --- Comment #15 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to G. Steinmetz from comment #14) > Even the standards changed, too. > F2018 has the audacity to demand chapter 4.2, item 2. "(2) it contains the capability to detect and report the use

[Bug c++/96103] Unclear diagnostic for a function return with "decltype(auto)"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96103 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/96104] New: internal compiler error: in finish_expr_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:681

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96104 Bug ID: 96104 Summary: internal compiler error: in finish_expr_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:681 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/96102] ICE in check_host_association, at fortran/resolve.c:5994

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96102 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org E

[Bug c++/96105] New: GCC not consistent on whether no_unique_address array is an empty data member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96105 Bug ID: 96105 Summary: GCC not consistent on whether no_unique_address array is an empty data member Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ac

[Bug c++/96104] [10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in finish_expr_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:681

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96104 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|internal compiler error: in |[10/11 Regression] internal

[Bug c++/96104] [10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in finish_expr_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:681

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96104 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Reduced: // PR c++/96104 template void fn(T &); class E {}; struct F { template void mfn(T t) { t, fn(E()); } // { dg-error "cannot bind non-const lvalue reference" } }; int main() { E e; F f; f.m

[Bug c++/96105] GCC not consistent on whether no_unique_address array is an empty data member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96105 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/95789] [10/11 Regression] Const method is allowed to return non-const reference on template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95789 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||60rntogo at gmail dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/96104] [10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in finish_expr_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:681

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96104 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/95789] [10/11 Regression] Const method is allowed to return non-const reference on template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95789 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Another test: // PR c++/96104 template void fn(T &); class E {}; struct F { template void mfn(T t) { t, fn(E()); } // { dg-error "cannot bind non-const lvalue reference" } }; int main() { E e; F f;

[Bug c++/92427] Initializing an element which has a zero-length array of a type-with-destructor causes an internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92427 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org As

[Bug c++/92427] Initializing an element which has a zero-length array of a type-with-destructor causes an internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92427 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:36e8db7c2af254a38fba5a874a3104a2cc1b1aac commit r11-1907-g36e8db7c2af254a38fba5a874a3104a2cc1b1aac Author: Marek Polacek Date: Tu

[Bug c++/92427] Initializing an element which has a zero-length array of a type-with-destructor causes an internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92427 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/95935] ICE : Segmentation fault crash_signal from toplev.c:328

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95935 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|error-recovery

  1   2   >