https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96063
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- What's wrong with checking the return value of warning_at as in the patch in comment 8?
- [Bug libstdc++/96063] New: mismatched-tags... ian.s.mcinerney at ieee dot org
- [Bug libstdc++/96063] mismatched-tags... redi at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug libstdc++/96063] mismatched-tags... ian.s.mcinerney at ieee dot org
- [Bug libstdc++/96063] mismatched-tags... redi at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug libstdc++/96063] mismatched-tags... redi at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug libstdc++/96063] mismatched-tags... ian.s.mcinerney at ieee dot org
- [Bug libstdc++/96063] mismatched-tags... ian.s.mcinerney at ieee dot org
- [Bug c++/96063] [10/11 Regression] mi... redi at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug c++/96063] [10/11 Regression] mi... redi at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug c++/96063] [10/11 Regression] mi... msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug c++/96063] [10/11 Regression] mi... redi at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug c++/96063] [10/11 Regression] mi... msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug c++/96063] [10/11 Regression] mi... cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug c++/96063] [10/11 Regression] mi... msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug c++/96063] [10/11 Regression] mi... ian.s.mcinerney at ieee dot org
- [Bug c++/96063] [10/11 Regression] mi... ian.s.mcinerney at ieee dot org
- [Bug c++/96063] [10/11 Regression] mi... redi at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug c++/96063] [10/11 Regression] mi... ian.s.mcinerney at ieee dot org
- [Bug c++/96063] [10/11 Regression] mi... cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug c++/96063] [10 Regression] misma... msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
