https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95488
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #1)
> > I think it's this TYPE_SIGN (TREE_TYPE (REG_EXPR (op1))).
>
> That's not reliable. Mutliplication shouldn't care ab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95488
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #1)
> > > I think it's this TYPE_SIGN (TREE_TYPE (REG_EXPR (op1))).
> >
> > Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95492
Bug ID: 95492
Summary: Avoid recursive inlining for -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94853
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90949
--- Comment #18 from Dávid Bolvanský ---
Yes, PR95492
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95493
Bug ID: 95493
Summary: [10 Regression] test for vector members apparently
reordered with assignment to vector members
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95492
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60158
--- Comment #7 from Joakim Tjernlund ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #6)
> The powerpcspe backend has been deprecated in GCC 8 and removed during GCC 9
> development. See corresponding mailing list threads[1,2,3] for details.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94109
--- Comment #6 from Antony Lewis ---
Thanks for looking in to it. I tried rebuilding my gcc8 docker and rerunning.
It now reports GNU Fortran (GCC) 8.4.1 20200602, however the leak still seems
to be there?
https://travis-ci.org/github/cmbant/CAM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95493
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.3.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95493
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.2
Component|tree-optimizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95477
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-03
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95494
Bug ID: 95494
Summary: [11 regression] Several -fprofile-use tests FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95494
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95494
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-03
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95487
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Jakub, you added the scatter support - do you remember what the code tries to
> do here?
I've only added gathers myself (and only the AVX2-ish), scatters were a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68837
HaoChen Gui changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95421
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95399
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95493
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #3 from Ri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95493
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94874
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93535a2b40367e6f68433295b37dc52c0e9c2c55
commit r11-873-g93535a2b40367e6f68433295b37dc52c0e9c2c55
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94874
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95493
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Now, the real issue is of course that we fail to properly expand the inner
MEM_REF since get_inner_reference strips that away and so we expand the
decl resulting in bogus mem_attrs being applied. That is, w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94109
--- Comment #7 from Antony Lewis ---
However the reduced case of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94361
now seems to be OK.
However on trunk, the fix for 94361 seems to have introduced a leak that was
not there before: https://travis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95495
Bug ID: 95495
Summary: ice in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations, at
tree-vect-slp.c:2893
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95489
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> (bit_and (ne (bit_and x_3 y_4) 0) (ne x_3 0))
This could be simplified
> where I'd say we miss
>
> (bit_and (ne @0 integer_zerop) (ne @1 integer_zerop))
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95496
Bug ID: 95496
Summary: [10/11 Regression] Bogus -Wformat-overflow= warnings
with -fsanitize=undefined
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95487
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95492
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Note we're also doing IPA-CP cloning and apply the same recursive inlining
there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95495
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95306
--- Comment #4 from bouanto at zoho dot com ---
Thanks for all your work.
I'm now facing this issue with the builtin __atomic_load:
libgccjit.so: error: unimplemented primitive type for builtin (type:
BT_CONST_VOLATILE_PTR)
Can you add support
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95494
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
> Can you please test the current master?
> This patch could fix it: a04b7410d305800b747963ab940d2b1a602b5ddf
Unfortunately, it doesn't make a dif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94109
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Unfortunately, without a somewhat reduced test case, there is
not a lot I can do :-(
Could you run this under valgrind, pinpoint the memory
leaks (somewhat) and then try to reduce this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95496
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-03
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95496
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95497
Bug ID: 95497
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: concepts with a fully known /
complete type in requires
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87291
bouanto at zoho dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bouanto at zoho dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95498
Bug ID: 95498
Summary: unhandled conversion
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: jit
Assignee: dma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93623
--- Comment #11 from calixte ---
Why did you remove __gcov_flush ?
FYI, we use it in Firefox to dump counters on SIGUSR1:
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/tools/code-coverage/CodeCoverageHandler.cpp#49
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94109
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
For the record:
% gfc pr94361.f90 -fanalyzer
pr94361.f90:24:0:
24 | end subroutine
|
Warning: leak of 'test.t.dat.data' [CWE-401] [-Wanalyzer-malloc-leak]
'leaker': events 1-11
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80174
Bug 80174 depends on bug 68358, which changed state.
Bug 68358 Summary: Some tests in gfortran.dg fail when compiled with '-g -flto'
and Xcode 7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68358
What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68358
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95499
Bug ID: 95499
Summary: ICE: during GIMPLE pass: ssa / segfault in verify_ssa
/ OpenMP target with deferred-length CHARACTER
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95487
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
We also fail to unswitch the outer loop on if (d) (probably simply because we
don't unswitch outer loops). It's likely the invariantness of the condition
that makes the problem. We're vectorizing
[loca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95497
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87291
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Note to self: GCC's documentation for using asm from C:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Using-Assembly-Language-with-C.html
Thanks for the suggestions.
I'm not seeing how the proposed entrypoints in co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95494
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Is there a compile farm machine I can test it on?
Btw. can you please make a brief analysis why it fails (valgrind)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95494
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
> Is there a compile farm machine I can test it on?
Sure: gcc211 should do the trick.
> Btw. can you please make a brief analysis why it fails (v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60158
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It does not happen on any target currently, and it has never happened
on non-SPE targets before.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95495
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:779ae320bfadc5d867ecaeddf394838d546b57b9
commit r11-876-g779ae320bfadc5d867ecaeddf394838d546b57b9
Author: Richard Biener
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95495
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94109
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9)
> Is it a false positive or not?
You probably need a higher optimization level with -fanalyzer,
it doesn't show anything at -O. Nor does valgrind show an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95500
Bug ID: 95500
Summary: Segfault compiling extra interface on intrinsic
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95306
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d36cc21b69d952967a4df6653954f572a101796
commit r11-877-g6d36cc21b69d952967a4df6653954f572a101796
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95348
--- Comment #26 from Qing Zhao ---
> --- Comment #25 from Martin Liška ---
>> I will try to get more data on our real application.
>>
>> one question: why not just delete the entire records whose counter is zero
>> and delete the entire file w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95306
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
I've added the type; hopefully the builtin works as expected.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95468
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93814
--- Comment #6 from G. Steinmetz ---
Following (valid) cases should also be considered (no ICE) :
$ cat z2.f90
function f()
character :: f, g
entry g()
end
$ cat z3.f90
function f() bind(c)
integer :: f, g
entry g() bind(c)
end
$ cat z4.f9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82314
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #5 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95501
Bug ID: 95501
Summary: ICE in gfc_match_pointer_assignment, at
fortran/match.c:1422
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95500
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95502
Bug ID: 95502
Summary: ICE in gfc_check_do_variable, at fortran/parse.c:4446
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95499
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Test case need the change (in line 40) to compile - sorry.
@@ -40 +40 @@
-if (any (array /= [(-2*i, i = 1, nn)])) error stop 2
+if (any (array /= [(-2*i, i = 1, 10)])) error stop 2
Shorter test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95503
Bug ID: 95503
Summary: ICE in gfc_is_simply_contiguous, at
fortran/expr.c:5844
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95504
Bug ID: 95504
Summary: ICE in transfer_array_component, at
fortran/trans-io.c:2167
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95468
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
The reason we fail to compile the testcase when 'condition' is at class scope
instead of at namespace scope is because in the former case, the template
argument 'c::condition' is a CALL_EXPR to a BASELINK, an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95504
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95496
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||85741
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95505
Bug ID: 95505
Summary: [coroutines] ICE assert with
get_return_object_on_allocation_failure
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95490
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95353
--- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor ---
*** Bug 95490 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 95490, which changed state.
Bug 95490 Summary: [10/11 Regression] writing 1 byte into a region of size 0
[-Wstringop-overflow=] since r10-5451-gef29b12cfbb4979a89b3cbadbf485a77c8fd8fce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95279
--- Comment #14 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I think it's invalid to refer to element (size_t)-1 of an array; that the
actual integer value used has to be within the range of available array
elements.
It's entirely possible that suc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95485
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Ah, yes, -Wpedantic does detect the invalid conversion. But few projects use
-Wpedantic (GCC itself doesn't) and enabling the warning in -Wall or -Wextra
would likely lead to lots of noise for code that conve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95279
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #14)
> I think it's invalid to refer to element (size_t)-1 of an array; that the
> actual integer value used has to be within the range of available array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95506
Bug ID: 95506
Summary: [OpenMP] omp target – private clause and allocatables
– unallocated or reallocation
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95499
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94986
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Wil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95496
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95507
Bug ID: 95507
Summary: [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wnonnull
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95508
Bug ID: 95508
Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE on unexpected expression
implicit_conv_expr since r10-7096
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95508
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94986
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95507
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-03
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95508
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95502
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
Las
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95487
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95487
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:887c45fb5b047171e82710baa51108d5c210eb42
commit r11-878-g887c45fb5b047171e82710baa51108d5c210eb42
Author: Richard Biener
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94986
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95501
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86568
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-03
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94986
--- Comment #4 from Nick Desaulniers ---
(In reply to nsz from comment #2)
> on arm the -pg abi is
>
> func:
> push {lr}
> bl _gnu_mcount_nc
> ...
>
> so no frame pointer is involved, -pg implying
> -fno-omit-frame-pointer is a historical
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95496
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2)
> The instrumentation added by the sanitizers is known to lead to introducing
> invalid code (typically by jump threading) that triggers spurious warnings.
I don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94986
--- Comment #5 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Nick Desaulniers from comment #4)
> (In reply to nsz from comment #2)
> > ideally r7 clobber would just work with -pg -fomit-frame-pointer.
> > the alloca problem is a separate issue (tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67938
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d57c30611b05a89fd265f6c0a74fe829c21cd34
commit r11-879-g8d57c30611b05a89fd265f6c0a74fe829c21cd34
Author: José Rui Faustino de So
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95214
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d57c30611b05a89fd265f6c0a74fe829c21cd34
commit r11-879-g8d57c30611b05a89fd265f6c0a74fe829c21cd34
Author: José Rui Faustino de So
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66833
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d57c30611b05a89fd265f6c0a74fe829c21cd34
commit r11-879-g8d57c30611b05a89fd265f6c0a74fe829c21cd34
Author: José Rui Faustino de So
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66833
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67938
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resol
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
