https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95468
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org, | |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Summary|ICE in expression sfinae |[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE | |in expression sfinae Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code Target Milestone|--- |8.5 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to kab from comment #1) > This was labeled as "ice-on-invalid-code". Am I missing something? I don't > see anything invalid here. I just now adjusted the label to be "ice-on-valid-code" instead. This seems to be a regression relative to GCC 4.8, which compiles the testcase successfully (with -std=c++11). We began ICEing on the testcase starting with r0-122271. Here is a reduced testcase: template <int> struct a { }; struct c { template <int d> static constexpr bool condition() { return d; } }; template<typename> void foo() { using A = a<c::condition<bool(true)>()>; } void bar() { foo<int>(); }