[Bug middle-end/94449] [10 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr92904.c gcc.dg/torture/pr48731.c

2020-04-01 Thread linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94449 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #8 from Kewen Lin ---

[Bug target/94393] Powerpc suboptimal 64-bit constant comparison

2020-04-01 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94393 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- There are two parts to fixing this PR. 1) We can do better in the sequences generated for some constants. 2) rs6000_rtx_costs needs to be accurate, so that expensive constants are put in memory and stay there wi

[Bug middle-end/94449] [10 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr92904.c gcc.dg/torture/pr48731.c

2020-04-01 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94449 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #8) > May I ask for the configuration option? > > I used x86_64 machine in CFarm with cpuinfo > I used --prefix=/usr/10.0.1 --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --enable-

[Bug target/94452] New: I386 ABI: How to determine the alignment of struct or union determined when passes them on stack？

2020-04-01 Thread chen3.liu at intel dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94452 Bug ID: 94452 Summary: I386 ABI: How to determine the alignment of struct or union determined when passes them on stack？ Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/94449] [10 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr92904.c gcc.dg/torture/pr48731.c

2020-04-01 Thread linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94449 --- Comment #10 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9) > (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #8) > > May I ask for the configuration option? > > > > I used x86_64 machine in CFarm with cpuinfo > > > > I used > > --prefix=/u

[Bug tree-optimization/94443] [10 Regression] 510.parest_r and 526.blender_r ICE: verify_ssa failed since r10-7491-gbd0f22a8d5caea8905f38ff1fafce31c1b7d33ad

2020-04-01 Thread linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94443 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug middle-end/94449] [10 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr92904.c gcc.dg/torture/pr48731.c

2020-04-01 Thread linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94449 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/94030] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE equivalence of an integer and an element of an array of size n

2020-04-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94030 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf1f6d8819ade074271df718f01fd3a5a9dc1b82 commit r10-7507-gbf1f6d8819ade074271df718f01fd3a5a9dc1b82 Author: Mark Eggleston Date:

[Bug middle-end/94449] [10 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr92904.c gcc.dg/torture/pr48731.c

2020-04-01 Thread linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94449 --- Comment #12 from Kewen Lin --- Sorry, correction: corei7-avx is from system gcc. With my built gcc, it's sandybridge. But no difference for the pass/fail result.

[Bug fortran/93498] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_findloc, at fortran/iresolve.c:1844 since r9-3688-g01ce9e31a02c8039

2020-04-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93498 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c54eab5a302c6da015bb39b1a81f6799e45a650 commit r10-7508-g2c54eab5a302c6da015bb39b1a81f6799e45a650 Author: Mark Eggleston Date:

<    1   2   3