[Bug target/94343] [10 Regression] invalid AVX512VL vpternlogd instruction emitted for -march=knl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343 --- Comment #11 from jbeulich at suse dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > Though, there are other issues. There is only vpternlog{d,q}, so for > V*[QH]Imode we shouldn't pretend we have masking support. Why would this be? T

[Bug target/94343] [10 Regression] invalid AVX512VL vpternlogd instruction emitted for -march=knl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343 --- Comment #12 from jbeulich at suse dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > Created attachment 48128 [details] > gcc10-pr94343.patch > > Updated patch. A variant to that would be 4 separate patterns I guess, not > sure if tha

[Bug target/94343] [10 Regression] invalid AVX512VL vpternlogd instruction emitted for -march=knl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343 --- Comment #13 from jbeulich at suse dot com --- As to using 512-bit operations even on more narrow input types - is this correct when e.g. subsequently source code upcasts the vector? I.e. would such an upcast be carried out by emitting an insn

[Bug rtl-optimization/94344] [9/10 Regression] Rotate pattern not recognized anymore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94344 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/94342] GCC ignores attribute((section(...))) for static variables inside templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94342 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Yes, they are orthogonal. But I expected that when I use __attribute__((section"foo")) twice then both instances will be in the same section which is not the case here. Here just the names of the sections

[Bug debug/94273] [10 Regression] ICE in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:5657 since r10-7235-g52b3aa8be1893848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94273 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- OK, so during early creation of the DIE for the type we end up in static void gen_struct_or_union_type_die (tree type, dw_die_ref context_die, enum debug_info_usage usage) {

[Bug target/94343] [10 Regression] invalid AVX512VL vpternlogd instruction emitted for -march=knl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to jbeulich from comment #13) > As to using 512-bit operations even on more narrow input types - is this > correct when e.g. subsequently source code upcasts the vector? I.e. would > such an upcast

[Bug debug/94273] [10 Regression] ICE in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:5657 since r10-7235-g52b3aa8be1893848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94273 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug web/94351] New: bugzilla search is not as useful as before

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94351 Bug ID: 94351 Summary: bugzilla search is not as useful as before Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: web

[Bug web/94349] Bugzilla user preferences are blank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94349 --- Comment #3 from Frédéric Buclin --- Hum, what happened recently, server side? The source code didn't change for months (or if it changed, someone else did).

[Bug web/94349] Bugzilla user preferences are blank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94349 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- The entire server was replaced, with new hardware, new OS, and new versions of most software.

[Bug middle-end/94339] [10 regression] ICE in tree_class_check_failed since r10-7344-gca6c722561ce9b9d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94339 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72809d6fe8e085440403ce125c51d01d6e7512b0 commit r10-7410-g72809d6fe8e085440403ce125c51d01d6e7512b0 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Fr

[Bug tree-optimization/94352] New: Suspicious code in tree-ssa-propagate.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94352 Bug ID: 94352 Summary: Suspicious code in tree-ssa-propagate.c Product: gcc Version: tree-ssa Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-o

[Bug web/94349] Bugzilla user preferences are blank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94349 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- The "Detailed Bug Information" part of the Advanced Search page is also not properly populated now. It used to have fields for searching comments, keywords and more.

[Bug web/94351] bugzilla search is not as useful as before

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94351 --- Comment #1 from Frédéric Buclin --- You don't have to use the custom search part. The other fields are still there, as before.

[Bug c++/94326] g++: error: pack.ii: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94326 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2eea00c518d5a72d0bdbc810ae675e7ad5fee414 commit r10-7411-g2eea00c518d5a72d0bdbc810ae675e7ad5fee414 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Fr

[Bug libstdc++/94353] New: std::copy* breaks when one type is volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94353 Bug ID: 94353 Summary: std::copy* breaks when one type is volatile Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstd

[Bug web/94349] Bugzilla user preferences are blank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94349 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > The "Detailed Bug Information" part of the Advanced Search page is also not > properly populated now. It used to have fields for searching comments, > keywords

[Bug target/94343] [10 Regression] invalid AVX512VL vpternlogd instruction emitted for -march=knl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to jbeulich from comment #11) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > > Though, there are other issues. There is only vpternlog{d,q}, so for > > V*[QH]Imode we shouldn't pretend we have ma

[Bug web/94351] bugzilla search is not as useful as before

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94351 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/94343] [10 Regression] invalid AVX512VL vpternlogd instruction emitted for -march=knl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343 --- Comment #16 from jbeulich at suse dot com --- Oh, right - I didn't pay attention to the insn permitting masking to be used. Then still non-masked uses ought to be permitted, perhaps by having a VI48_AVX512VL one permitting masking and a VI12_A

[Bug libstdc++/94353] std::copy* breaks when one type is volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94353 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/94013] [10 Regression] library algos need to work around cwg 2094

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94013 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alex at grundis dot de --- Comment #7

[Bug target/94343] [10 Regression] invalid AVX512VL vpternlogd instruction emitted for -march=knl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94343 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- The patch I've posted - https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-March/542774.html - solves it by disabling the problematic masked cases in the condition. Or we could just disable the masking on the i

[Bug c/94338] struct member alignment is not carried over to alignment of struct variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94338 --- Comment #5 from huaixin chang --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > I think the testcase is ill-formed and should be diagnosed in some form. > IIRC there's some documented behavior (that's not implemented) that > __aligned__ > on

[Bug fortran/94030] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE equivalence of an integer and an element of an array of size n

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94030 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc do

[Bug fortran/93363] [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_class_from_expr, at fortran/trans-expr.c:484

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93363 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a76ff304f905db9fd9b049c2ca4ec84f0420da53 commit r10-7412-ga76ff304f905db9fd9b049c2ca4ec84f0420da53 Author: Tobias Burnus Date: Fr

[Bug c/94338] struct member alignment is not carried over to alignment of struct variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94338 --- Comment #6 from huaixin chang --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #3) > It's a mistake to be referring to the C standard for the interpretation of > alignment attributes. The C standard way of specifying alignment is > _A

[Bug libstdc++/94354] New: std::reverse_iterator comparison operators defined incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94354 Bug ID: 94354 Summary: std::reverse_iterator comparison operators defined incorrectly Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid

[Bug c++/94342] GCC ignores attribute((section(...))) for static variables inside templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94342 --- Comment #8 from Anton --- Yeah, the generated sections are different yet have the same name. The user would rely on the static linker to merge the sections into a single one.

[Bug fortran/93363] [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_class_from_expr, at fortran/trans-expr.c:484

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93363 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org St

[Bug web/94351] bugzilla search is not as useful as before

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94351 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- When edititing a saved search that has used these fields they are lost.

[Bug tree-optimization/94352] Suspicious code in tree-ssa-propagate.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94352 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/94338] struct member alignment is not carried over to alignment of struct variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94338 --- Comment #7 from huaixin chang --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4) > Sounds like there's agreement that the code should at least get a warning > then, so confirmed. > > The attribute aligned section of the manual describing the va

[Bug libstdc++/94354] std::reverse_iterator comparison operators defined incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94354 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-03-27 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/94220] libgcc FTB for ARM Thumb when optimizing for size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94220 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a9cd2d786ad4c45b9349e7fe22131782828d4cbd commit r10-7413-ga9cd2d786ad4c45b9349e7fe22131782828d4cbd Author: Richard Earnshaw Date

[Bug target/94220] libgcc FTB for ARM Thumb when optimizing for size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94220 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:66e0e23c12d143c8caf787d95ff356f009b1fca9 commit r10-7414-g66e0e23c12d143c8caf787d95ff356f009b1fca9 Author: Richard Earnshaw Date

[Bug c/94338] struct member alignment is not carried over to alignment of struct variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94338 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to huaixin chang from comment #7) > (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4) > > Sounds like there's agreement that the code should at least get a warning > > then, so confirmed. > > > > The at

[Bug c/94338] struct member alignment is not carried over to alignment of struct variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94338 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Btw, struct X { long a __attribute__((__aligned__(128))); long b __attribute__((__aligned__(128))); }; struct X A __attribute__((__aligned__(4))); is not diagnosed (this is what your testcase is, d

[Bug fortran/94324] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/default_format_1.f90 etc. FAIL on 32-bit Solaris/x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94324 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/94342] GCC ignores attribute((section(...))) for static variables inside templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94342 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug tree-optimization/90332] New test case gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-sad-2.c in r270847 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90332 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d689cf43b501a2f5c077389adbb6d2bfa530ca9 commit r10-7415-g8d689cf43b501a2f5c077389adbb6d2bfa530ca9 Author: Kewen Lin Date: Fri Mar 27

[Bug tree-optimization/90332] New test case gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-sad-2.c in r270847 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90332 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/93957] [10 Regression] ICE (regression) passing assumed rank arrays with bind(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93957 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62ede14d30f5d083f1ab23bcab6e0e3c9c649006 commit r10-7416-g62ede14d30f5d083f1ab23bcab6e0e3c9c649006 Author: Tobias Burnus Date: Fr

[Bug fortran/93957] [10 Regression] ICE (regression) passing assumed rank arrays with bind(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93957 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org St

[Bug web/94351] bugzilla search is not as useful as before

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94351 --- Comment #4 from Frédéric Buclin --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > Where? You are right. These fields are missing.

[Bug analyzer/94355] New: support for C++ new expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94355 Bug ID: 94355 Summary: support for C++ new expression Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: analyzer

[Bug c++/94342] GCC ignores attribute((section(...))) for static variables inside templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94342 --- Comment #10 from Anton --- I think there are two ways to handle the problem for targets that don't support COMDAT: 1) issue a diagnostic that the section attribute will be ignored (because it'll go to .gnu.linkone.*); 2) fallback to weak symb

[Bug analyzer/94355] support for C++ new expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94355 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- This is already being actively discussed, and will probably be a GSoC project.

[Bug target/90811] [nvptx] ptxas error on OpenMP offloaded code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90811 --- Comment #21 from Richard Biener --- Why is LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT not applied during layout_decl? (I realize for offloading this might be suboptimal)

[Bug target/90811] [nvptx] ptxas error on OpenMP offloaded code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90811 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek --- For offloading it is very harmful. Which is why I'd strongly prefer to do it after IPA, on the other side doing it at expansion time is too late.

[Bug tree-optimization/94352] Suspicious code in tree-ssa-propagate.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94352 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:917e21e8bcddf5047ee0ced063fca412ad81ce7f commit r10-7417-g917e21e8bcddf5047ee0ced063fca412ad81ce7f Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/94352] Suspicious code in tree-ssa-propagate.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94352 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/94273] [10 Regression] ICE in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:5657 since r10-7235-g52b3aa8be1893848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94273 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/94273] [10 Regression] ICE in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:5657 since r10-7235-g52b3aa8be1893848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94273 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45cfaf9903d3f5aa916d330f2013eb7d820a7137 commit r10-7418-g45cfaf9903d3f5aa916d330f2013eb7d820a7137 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/94356] New: Missed optimisation: useless multiplication generated for pointer comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94356 Bug ID: 94356 Summary: Missed optimisation: useless multiplication generated for pointer comparison Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug c/94338] struct member alignment is not carried over to alignment of struct variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94338 --- Comment #10 from huaixin chang --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9) > Btw, > > struct X { > long a __attribute__((__aligned__(128))); > long b __attribute__((__aligned__(128))); > }; > struct X A __attribute__((__aligned_

[Bug tree-optimization/94357] New: Inline assembly with memory operand is considered nothrow with `-fnon-call-exceptions`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94357 Bug ID: 94357 Summary: Inline assembly with memory operand is considered nothrow with `-fnon-call-exceptions` Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug fortran/94358] New: [OMP] Privatize internal array variables introduced by the Fortran FE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94358 Bug ID: 94358 Summary: [OMP] Privatize internal array variables introduced by the Fortran FE Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openacc

[Bug fortran/94358] [OMP] Privatize internal array variables introduced by the Fortran FE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94358 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge --- To help with OpenACC 'kernels' support, Gergő later submitted for og8 an additional change in "Rework OpenACC Fortran DO loop in

[Bug fortran/94358] [OMP] Privatize internal array variables introduced by the Fortran FE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94358 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org La

[Bug tree-optimization/94356] Missed optimisation: useless multiplication generated for pointer comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94356 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- That's because internally we use an unsigned type for offsets (including for the multiplication). There have been tries to change that...

[Bug tree-optimization/94329] [8/9/10 Regression] error: use_only.f90: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94329 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|debug

[Bug tree-optimization/94329] [8/9/10 Regression] error: use_only.f90: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94329 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug c++/94257] ICE in inline nested namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94257 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9dba60130dc3ebf7cce8716a36672281688693f7 commit r10-7423-g9dba60130dc3ebf7cce8716a36672281688693f7 Author: Nathan Sidwell Date:

[Bug c++/94257] ICE in inline nested namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94257 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/94356] Missed optimisation: useless multiplication generated for pointer comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94356 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug analyzer/94350] internal compiler error: in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4874

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94350 --- Comment #5 from Stephen Hemminger --- Created attachment 48132 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48132&action=edit Preprocessed version of source code

[Bug fortran/94030] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE equivalence of an integer and an element of an array of size n

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94030 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug analyzer/94350] internal compiler error: in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4874

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94350 --- Comment #6 from Stephen Hemminger --- $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 10.0.1 20200311 (Red Hat 10.0.1-0.9)

[Bug analyzer/94350] internal compiler error: in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4874

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94350 --- Comment #7 from Stephen Hemminger --- Verbose make output shows compiler flags gcc -Wp,-MD,./.eal_memalloc.o.d.tmp -m64 -pthread -I/home/shemminger/DPDK/upstream/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/include -march=native -DRTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSE -DRT

Support More Than 10452 Families All Over Lebanon

Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser | Share it You are seeing this Email in Plain Text Version; Switch to HTML or Click this link http://dits.ws/a/44654 to View it properly. http://www.spx-em.com/url/u8nGvLduh5R6hJJpe5rKzMl6pqrCvMO1tKW7vcfOgLu2sHmFm7e6aXuawsO-tbKumMLDs8CtuMJ

[Bug analyzer/94350] internal compiler error: in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4874

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94350 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[gnu.org #1509189] [wwwdocs] https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/git.html gives internal server error

Hello GCC maintainers, The same sort of error was reported by Jake Vossen on January 17 (gnu.org #1465799): "On the home page of gcc (https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/) if you click on 'Git' on the right hand side it takes you to https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/git.html, which is giving me an i

[Bug c++/93810] missing -Wmismatched-tags and -Wredundant-tags on a typedef of an implicit class template specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93810 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04dd734b52de121853e1ea6b3c197a598b294e23 commit r10-7424-g04dd734b52de121853e1ea6b3c197a598b294e23 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Fri

[Bug c++/94078] bogus and missing -Wmismatched-tags on an instance of a template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94078 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04dd734b52de121853e1ea6b3c197a598b294e23 commit r10-7424-g04dd734b52de121853e1ea6b3c197a598b294e23 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Fri

[Bug c++/93824] bogus -Wredundant-tags on a first declaration in use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93824 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04dd734b52de121853e1ea6b3c197a598b294e23 commit r10-7424-g04dd734b52de121853e1ea6b3c197a598b294e23 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Fri

[Bug middle-end/93786] [8/9/10 Regression] gimplifier ICE with statement expression since r8-5526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48133 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48133&action=edit gcc10-pr93786.patch Untested fix.

[Bug middle-end/86715] ICE passing too large argument on stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86715 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug target/94359] New: new test case g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94359 Bug ID: 94359 Summary: new test case g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic. C fails Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/94360] New: 6% run-time regression of 502.gcc_r against GCC 9 when compiled with -O2 and both PGO and LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94360 Bug ID: 94360 Summary: 6% run-time regression of 502.gcc_r against GCC 9 when compiled with -O2 and both PGO and LTO Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/93573] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:733

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93573 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/94361] New: Memory leak in nested types with final

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94361 Bug ID: 94361 Summary: Memory leak in nested types with final Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug analyzer/94362] New: False analyzer report due to i >= 0 and i < 0 on openssl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94362 Bug ID: 94362 Summary: False analyzer report due to i >= 0 and i < 0 on openssl Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug ipa/94360] 6% run-time regression of 502.gcc_r against GCC 9 when compiled with -O2 and both PGO and LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94360 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Unfortunately, the mentioned configuration is not tested on LNT periodic benchmarks.

[Bug tree-optimization/94356] Missed optimisation: useless multiplication generated for pointer comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94356 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- I tried https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2017-May/475037.html some time ago. Having a different type for the multiplication and the offsetting introduced a lot of NOPs and caused a few regressions (fro

[Bug target/94359] new test case g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94359 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-03-27 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/94359] new test case g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94359 --- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe --- it is not mandatory (for C++20 compliance) that the implementation provides symmetric transfer - so it could be switched off - or XFAILed. However, users state that an impl. that can't do the symmetric transf

[Bug c/94363] New: possible typo: attribute attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94363 Bug ID: 94363 Summary: possible typo: attribute attribute Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Ass

[Bug other/79469] Feature request: provide `__builtin_assume` builtin function to allow more aggressive optimizations and to match clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79469 felix changed: What|Removed |Added CC||felix.von.s at posteo dot de --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c/93573] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:733

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93573 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P4 |P2

[Bug c/93573] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:733

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93573 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48135 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48135&action=edit gcc10-pr93573.patch For the error-recovery ICE, we can just make sure that after errors the type isn't assumed

[Bug tree-optimization/94364] New: 505.mcf_r is 8% faster when compiled with -mprefer-vector-width=128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94364 Bug ID: 94364 Summary: 505.mcf_r is 8% faster when compiled with -mprefer-vector-width=128 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/93572] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: q from h referenced in main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93572 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug analyzer/94365] New: false positive leak when using container_of-like constructs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94365 Bug ID: 94365 Summary: false positive leak when using container_of-like constructs Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c/94366] New: OpenMP Parallel Reduction with "&&" operator does not compute correct result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94366 Bug ID: 94366 Summary: OpenMP Parallel Reduction with "&&" operator does not compute correct result Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug preprocessor/94367] New: pragma GCC diagnostics messes up with one line "if" blocks without curly braces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94367 Bug ID: 94367 Summary: pragma GCC diagnostics messes up with one line "if" blocks without curly braces Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug preprocessor/94367] pragma GCC diagnostics messes up with one line "if" blocks without curly braces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94367 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- pragma GCC diagnostics is a full statement.

[Bug c/63326] whether a #pragma is a statement depends on the type of pragma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63326 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com ---

[Bug preprocessor/94367] pragma GCC diagnostics messes up with one line "if" blocks without curly braces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94367 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

  1   2   >