[Bug libstdc++/94295] use __builtin_operator_new and __builtin_operator_delete when available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94295 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Richard Smith from comment #0) > The C++ language rules do not permit optimization (eg, deletion) of direct > calls to 'operator new' and 'operator delete'. I thought that was considered a bug? Gc

[Bug rtl-optimization/94292] [10 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in forward_propagate_and_simplify (fwprop.c:1417) with -O -g -fno-tree-dce since r10-3985-g8b8ab8f473b42933b9c1e292c4b1ab02adf1863a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94292 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/94293] [missed optimization] Useless statements populating local string not removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94293 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/94294] [missed optimization] new+delete of unused local string not removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94294 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-03-24 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/94293] [missed optimization] Useless statements populating local string not removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94293 --- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > DSE part ... DCE DSE = Dead Statement Elimination? DCE = Dead Code Elimination?

[Bug tree-optimization/94293] [missed optimization] Useless statements populating local string not removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94293 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 24 Mar 2020, eyalroz at technion dot ac.il wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94293 > > --- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comme

[Bug fortran/93600] [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_assignment, at fortran/match.c:1366/1340

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93600 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc do

[Bug c++/94276] [9/10 Regression] g++: error: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/stmtexpr3.C: -fcompare-debug failure since r9-3352-g87bd153645f393a1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94276 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug debug/94277] [9/10 Regression] error: undef.c: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length) since r9-6413-g1db01ff96aa5ce5c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94277 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:047811579f09048ed538674fd5251b35e5a92025 commit r10-7349-g047811579f09048ed538674fd5251b35e5a92025 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tu

[Bug debug/94283] [8/9/10 Regression] gcc: error: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-bopcond-1.c: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure since r7-4804-gb54819879e0518b3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94283 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a5a9400a846244d040caa6d1531434eee8fc8ec7 commit r10-7350-ga5a9400a846244d040caa6d1531434eee8fc8ec7 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tu

[Bug debug/94285] [9/10 Regression] gfortran: error: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_constructor_40.f90: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length) since r10-1654

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94285 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:565ab7efbdc68cca5a2a81d872015f33359048b4 commit r10-7351-g565ab7efbdc68cca5a2a81d872015f33359048b4 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tu

[Bug debug/94283] [8/9 Regression] gcc: error: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-bopcond-1.c: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure since r7-4804-gb54819879e0518b3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94283 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] gcc:|[8/9 Regression] gcc:

[Bug debug/94285] [9 Regression] gfortran: error: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_constructor_40.f90: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length) since r10-1654

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94285 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10 Regression] gfortran: |[9 Regression] gfortran:

[Bug debug/94277] [9 Regression] error: undef.c: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length) since r9-6413-g1db01ff96aa5ce5c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94277 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10 Regression] error:|[9 Regression] error:

[Bug tree-optimization/94293] [missed optimization] Useless statements populating local string not removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94293 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #6) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > > DSE part ... DCE > > DSE = Dead Statement Elimination? DCE = Dead Code Elimination? I thought Dse was dead st

[Bug debug/94281] [8/9/10 Regression] g++: error: hash.cpp: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length) since r8-5241-g8697bf9f46f36168

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94281 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug debug/94296] New: [10 Regression] gcc: error: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cleanup-13.c: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length) since r10-4482-gaea86742ce396375

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94296 Bug ID: 94296 Summary: [10 Regression] gcc: error: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cleanup-13.c: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length) since r10-4482-gaea86742ce396375 Product: gcc

[Bug debug/94296] [10 Regression] gcc: error: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cleanup-13.c: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length) since r10-4482-gaea86742ce396375

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94296 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/94286] [10 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2279 with __builtin_sub_overflow() at -O -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94286 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:596c90d35591589e0efddda65c81609fb422a986 commit r10-7352-g596c90d35591589e0efddda65c81609fb422a986 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tu

[Bug tree-optimization/94294] [missed optimization] new+delete of unused local string not removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94294 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- I don't believe there is a "new/delete" issue.

[Bug target/94286] [10 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2279 with __builtin_sub_overflow() at -O -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94286 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/94125] [9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94125 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Bin Cheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95c969e58f7905b14d3f2889cf41595eb2c13cbb commit r9-8411-g95c969e58f7905b14d3f2889cf41595eb2c13cbb Author: Bin Cheng Date: Tu

[Bug tree-optimization/94125] [9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94125 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Known to work|

[Bug c++/94297] New: std::replace internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94297 Bug ID: 94297 Summary: std::replace internal compiler error Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/94297] PPCLE std::replace internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94297 Jens Seifert changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|std::replace internal |PPCLE std::replace internal

[Bug target/94298] New: x86 duplicates loads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94298 Bug ID: 94298 Summary: x86 duplicates loads Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: un

[Bug debug/94281] [8/9/10 Regression] g++: error: hash.cpp: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length) since r8-5241-g8697bf9f46f36168

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94281 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug target/94254] [10 regression] r10-7312 causes compiler hangs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254 --- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #13) > (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #12) > > That patch looks fine, thank you! > > > > Is there some way you can test if this works? Idea

[Bug lto/94249] [10 regression] Many -flto -fuse-linker-plugin tests FAIL: could not add symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:906b3eb9df6c577d3f6e9c3ea5c9d7e4d1e90536 commit r10-7353-g906b3eb9df6c577d3f6e9c3ea5c9d7e4d1e90536 Author: Martin Liska Date: Tue

[Bug target/94254] [10 regression] r10-7312 causes compiler hangs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254 --- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #14) > (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #11) > > Created attachment 48088 [details] > > Candidate patch > > It fixes the build for me. > I am unable

[Bug lto/94249] [10 regression] Many -flto -fuse-linker-plugin tests FAIL: could not add symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/94296] [10 Regression] gcc: error: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cleanup-13.c: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length) since r10-4482-gaea86742ce396375

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94296 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- This is yet another test that should be dg-skip-if -fcompare-debug and -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables. The code is different depending on the __GCC_HAVE_DWARF2_CFI_ASM macro, which is dependent on whether -g

[Bug sanitizer/94299] New: false positive: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-scope on address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94299 Bug ID: 94299 Summary: false positive: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-scope on address Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/94299] false positive: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-scope on address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94299 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/94299] false positive: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-scope on address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94299 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I forgot to say one more thing, GCC is more strict than LLVM when it comes to temps going out of scope too.

[Bug sanitizer/94299] false positive: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-scope on address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94299 --- Comment #3 from Jan Kratochvil --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > #1 0x7fffdb147b04 in > lldb_private::CommandObject::CommandObject(lldb_private::CommandInterpreter&, > llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, uns

[Bug target/94291] [10 Regression] ICE: in reg_or_subregno, at jump.c:1928 at -Og since r10-3993-ga79048f6250febc1acce09d790035276d534e754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94291 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/94291] [10 Regression] ICE: in reg_or_subregno, at jump.c:1928 at -Og since r10-3993-ga79048f6250febc1acce09d790035276d534e754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94291 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- This is on try_combine on: (gdb) p debug_rtx (i3) (insn 20 12 22 2 (set (mem/c:SI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 102 sfp) (const_int -4 [0xfffc])) [1 x+0 S4 A32]) (reg:SI 125)) "pr9429

[Bug sanitizer/94299] false positive: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-scope on address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94299 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug target/94292] [10 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in forward_propagate_and_simplify (fwprop.c:1417) with -O -g -fno-tree-dce since r10-3985-g8b8ab8f473b42933b9c1e292c4b1ab02adf1863a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94292 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug tree-optimization/94300] New: [10 Regression] memcpy vector load miscompiled during const-prop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94300 Bug ID: 94300 Summary: [10 Regression] memcpy vector load miscompiled during const-prop Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug sanitizer/94299] false positive: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-scope on address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94299 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- So I was able to reproduce the problem but I don't see what exactly happens there. Note that -O2 is needed in order to process inlining and further optimizations. I bet it's an issue in the code itself. Feel f

[Bug target/94298] x86 duplicates loads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94298 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- The situation is a bit more complicated. IRA DTRT: 8: r85:V2DF=[r86:DI+`y'] REG_EQUIV [r86:DI+`y'] 11: r89:V2DF=vec_select(vec_concat(r85:V2DF,r85:V2DF),parallel) 12: r90:V2DF=vec_select(vec_co

[Bug tree-optimization/94300] [10 Regression] memcpy vector load miscompiled during const-prop since r10-6809-g7f5617b00445dcc8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94300 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/94259] --without-zstd seems to have no effect and links libzstd if available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94259 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug tree-optimization/94274] fold phi whose incoming args are defined from binary operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94274 --- Comment #3 from z.zhanghaijian at huawei dot com --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1) > Detecting common beginnings / endings in branches is something gcc does very > seldom. Even at -Os, for if(cond)f(b);else f(c); we need to wait u

[Bug target/94298] x86 duplicates loads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94298 --- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 24 Mar 2020, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94298 > > --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- > The situation is a bit more complicated. IRA D

[Bug target/94298] x86 duplicates loads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94298 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #2) > So I wonder whether the bug is that there is a memory alternative > in the first place? Memory alternative should be OK, we do have insns that access memory.

[Bug tree-optimization/94300] [10 Regression] memcpy vector load miscompiled during const-prop since r10-6809-g7f5617b00445dcc8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94300 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/94298] x86 duplicates loads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94298 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 24 Mar 2020, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94298 > > --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #2

[Bug libgomp/81689] libgomp.c/target-link-1.c fails for nvptx: #pragma omp target link not implemented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81689 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2211a60ff05b7a0289d3e287e72c181bb4d5d8b commit r10-7354-gc2211a60ff05b7a0289d3e287e72c181bb4d5d8b Author: Tobias Burnus Date: Tu

[Bug debug/94283] [8/9 Regression] gcc: error: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-bopcond-1.c: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure since r7-4804-gb54819879e0518b3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94283 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- *** Bug 94284 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug debug/94284] [9/10 Regression] gcc: error: fort.f90: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length) since r9-7156-g33579b59aaf02eb7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94284 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/94301] New: Missed vector-vector CTOR / permute simplification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94301 Bug ID: 94301 Summary: Missed vector-vector CTOR / permute simplification Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/67960] [8/9 Regression] Prefixing a function with [[deprecated]] produces multiple warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67960 --- Comment #11 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #10) > (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #8) > > Fixed on trunk by r10-7159. > > so... keeping open for backports, I take it? Probably yes.

[Bug tree-optimization/94300] [10 Regression] memcpy vector load miscompiled during const-prop since r10-6809-g7f5617b00445dcc8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94300 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48105 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48105&action=edit gcc10-pr94300.patch Untested fix.

[Bug target/94052] Paradoxical subregs out of expand causes ICE with multi register modes at -O2 or higher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94052 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8fa2081ca6288853f3b8ceecd7d57ddf5dba5e7a commit r9-8412-g8fa2081ca6288853f3b8ceecd7d57ddf5dba5e7a Author: Tamar Christina

[Bug c++/94223] [10 Regression] -fcompare-debug -O0 failure on cpp1z/init-statement6.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94223 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48106 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48106&action=edit gcc10-pr94223.patch Untested fix.

[Bug target/94052] Paradoxical subregs out of expand causes ICE with multi register modes at -O2 or higher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94052 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0349bc70454e4de18d1cdf5eea0917646fdf79ae commit r8-10139-g0349bc70454e4de18d1cdf5eea0917646fdf79ae Author: Tamar Christina

[Bug target/89967] Inefficient code generation for vld2q_lane_u8 under aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89967 Bug 89967 depends on bug 94052, which changed state. Bug 94052 Summary: Paradoxical subregs out of expand causes ICE with multi register modes at -O2 or higher https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94052 What|Removed

[Bug target/94052] Paradoxical subregs out of expand causes ICE with multi register modes at -O2 or higher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94052 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/94301] Missed vector-vector CTOR / permute simplification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94301 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-03-24 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/89057] [8/9/10 Regression] AArch64 ld3 st4 less optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89057 Bug 89057 depends on bug 94052, which changed state. Bug 94052 Summary: Paradoxical subregs out of expand causes ICE with multi register modes at -O2 or higher https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94052 What|Removed

[Bug c++/94066] [8/9 Regression] ICE (starting/ending union member lifetime) in cxx_eval_bare_aggregate, at cp/constexpr.c:3790 since r6-7592

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94066 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE |[8/9 Regression] ICE |

[Bug d/91628] libdruntime uses glibc internal symbol on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91628 --- Comment #17 from Iain Buclaw --- I have no strong preferences, if people are wanting to go with the .S file, then that's fine by me, feel free to commit (or I will if you'd prefer). I'm just noting that I've seen a patch to implement musl su

[Bug c++/94302] New: Implement DR 2310: Type completeness and derived-to-base pointer conversions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94302 Bug ID: 94302 Summary: Implement DR 2310: Type completeness and derived-to-base pointer conversions Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug d/91628] libdruntime uses glibc internal symbol on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91628 --- Comment #18 from Iain Buclaw --- (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #17) > I have no strong preferences, if people are wanting to go with the .S file, > then that's fine by me, feel free to commit (or I will if you'd prefer). > It would

[Bug libgomp/81689] libgomp.c/target-link-1.c fails for nvptx: #pragma omp target link not implemented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81689 Bug 81689 depends on bug 94251, which changed state. Bug 94251 Summary: [OpenMP] 'target link' fails at run time / libgomp.c/target-link-1.c fails on GCN https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94251 What|Removed

[Bug libgomp/94251] [OpenMP] 'target link' fails at run time / libgomp.c/target-link-1.c fails on GCN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94251 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/81689] libgomp.c/target-link-1.c fails for nvptx: #pragma omp target link not implemented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81689 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/94303] New: Program result error When using global object array (partially initialized with a special constructor, and the rest with the default constructor)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94303 Bug ID: 94303 Summary: Program result error When using global object array (partially initialized with a special constructor, and the rest with the default constructor) Prod

[Bug c++/94288] co_await in while loop crashes g++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94288 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug d/94304] New: libphobos: Add --with-libdruntime-only configure option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94304 Bug ID: 94304 Summary: libphobos: Add --with-libdruntime-only configure option Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug d/94305] New: libphobos: Add configure flag to build phobos in non-release mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94305 Bug ID: 94305 Summary: libphobos: Add configure flag to build phobos in non-release mode Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/94249] [10 regression] Many -flto -fuse-linker-plugin tests FAIL: could not add symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04099157691ec6ff25d8d32e30b04eec89dcf94b commit r10-7355-g04099157691ec6ff25d8d32e30b04eec89dcf94b Author: John David Anglin D

[Bug c++/94303] [8/9/10 Regression] Program result error When using global object array (partially initialized with a special constructor, and the rest with the default constructor)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94303 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfir

[Bug lto/94249] [10 regression] Many -flto -fuse-linker-plugin tests FAIL: could not add symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249 --- Comment #16 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by John David Anglin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:366f69fdf42854f76b90ce81394e3685f2990988 commit r9-8413-g366f69fdf42854f76b90ce81394e3685f2990988 Author: John David An

[Bug target/94297] PPCLE std::replace internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94297 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/94303] [8/9/10 Regression] Program result error When using global object array (partially initialized with a special constructor, and the rest with the default constructor)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94303 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.0, 8.3.0, 9.2.0 Known to work|

[Bug c++/94303] [8/9/10 Regression] Program result error When using global object array (partially initialized with a special constructor, and the rest with the default constructor)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94303 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Jonathan has bisected this to my r9-4877-gfaa9232da39587b27b46341667d6d415d2af9280 change (though, as the patch shows, the bug is actually that varasm.c didn't handle RANGE_EXPRs properly during output_constr

[Bug lto/94249] [10 regression] Many -flto -fuse-linker-plugin tests FAIL: could not add symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by John David Anglin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc65052d2351aeb1f1968b6ac9f1244de6ed64e1 commit r8-10140-gdc65052d2351aeb1f1968b6ac9f1244de6ed64e1 Author: John David A

[Bug c++/94265] wrong warning "duplicated 'if' condition"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94265 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/66416] string::find_last_of 3.5 times slower than memrchr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66416 AK changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hiraditya at msn dot com --- Comment #2 from AK --

[Bug middle-end/94303] [8/9/10 Regression] Program result error When using global object array (partially initialized with a special constructor, and the rest with the default constructor)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94303 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48107 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48107&action=edit gcc10-pr94303.patch Full untested patch.

[Bug c++/87910] Missing typename/template not diagnosed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87910 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- This PR might get resolved by .

[Bug c++/65969] typename allowed in using declaration of non-types names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65969 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/66414] string::find ten times slower than strstr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66414 AK changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hiraditya at msn dot com --- Comment #8 from AK --

[Bug libstdc++/93584] std::string::find_first_not_of is about 9X slower than strspn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93584 AK changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hiraditya at msn dot com --- Comment #3 from AK --

[Bug fortran/94246] [9/10 Regression] valgrind error for ./gfortran.dg/bessel_5.f90 since r9-1566-g87c789f1c0b2df41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug tree-optimization/93946] Bogus redundant store removal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93946 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/94306] New: Improve diagnostic when "requires" used instead of "requires requires" and add fix-it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94306 Bug ID: 94306 Summary: Improve diagnostic when "requires" used instead of "requires requires" and add fix-it Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keyw

[Bug c++/94252] Can't use a lambda in a requires expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94252 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Known to fail|

[Bug sanitizer/94307] New: Provide a way to declare the *SAN exception handler -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94307 Bug ID: 94307 Summary: Provide a way to declare the *SAN exception handler -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/94308] New: [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 with vzeroupper

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94308 Bug ID: 94308 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 with vzeroupper Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug target/94308] [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 with vzeroupper since r10-6451

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94308 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10 Regression] ICE in |[10 Regression] ICE in

[Bug target/94308] [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 with vzeroupper since r10-6451

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94308 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48109 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48109&action=edit gcc10-pr94308.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c/94253] FAIL: gfortran.dg/bind_c_coms.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94253 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- r278376 was okay. r278658 was bad.

[Bug target/94123] [10 regression] r10-1734, SVN r273240, causes gcc.target/powerpc/pr87507.c to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94123 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug sanitizer/94299] false positive: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-scope on address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94299 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/94299] false positive: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-scope on address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94299 --- Comment #7 from Jan Kratochvil --- OK, true, thanks, sorry.

  1   2   >