[Bug rtl-optimization/92796] [10 Regression] ICE in lra_assign, at lra-assigns.c:1646 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92796 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/92622] FAIL: gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-22.c on ILP32: missing warnings for VLA on lines 67 and 69

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92622 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- The reduced test case below reproduces the spurious nature of the failure outside the test harness: $ (set -x; cat t.c && for i in 1 2 3; do gcc -O2 -S -Warray-bounds -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 -m32 t.c ; done

[Bug ipa/92800] IPA escape analysis for structs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92800 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Müllner --- Thanks for mentioning that. We have an upcoming conf call with Marvell where we will discuss this.

[Bug c++/92271] for consistency, __is_same_as should be named __is_same

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92271 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/92271] for consistency, __is_same_as should be named __is_same

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92271 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Dec 5 20:06:46 2019 New Revision: 279018 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279018&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/92271 - make __is_same alias for __is_same_as. Richard

[Bug c++/92831] CWG1299 extend_ref_init_temps_1 punts on COND_EXPRs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92831 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Even better testcase that has nested COND_EXPRs: template using id = T; struct S { S () { s++; } ~S () { s--; } S (int) { s++; } static int s; }; int S::s = 0; void bar (bool cond, bool cond2) { if (S::s !

[Bug c++/91353] Implement P1331R2: Permitting trivial default initialization in constexpr contexts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91353 --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Dec 5 20:13:03 2019 New Revision: 279019 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279019&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/91353 - P1331R2: Allow trivial default init in constexpr

[Bug tree-optimization/92834] New: misssed SLP vectorization in LightPixel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92834 Bug ID: 92834 Summary: misssed SLP vectorization in LightPixel Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optim

[Bug tree-optimization/92825] Unnecesary stack protection in Firefox's LightPixel.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92825 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Unnecesary stack protection |Unnecesary stack protection

[Bug c++/91353] Implement P1331R2: Permitting trivial default initialization in constexpr contexts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91353 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88323] implement C++20 language features.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323 Bug 88323 depends on bug 91353, which changed state. Bug 91353 Summary: Implement P1331R2: Permitting trivial default initialization in constexpr contexts https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91353 What|Removed

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 91353, which changed state. Bug 91353 Summary: Implement P1331R2: Permitting trivial default initialization in constexpr contexts https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91353 What|Removed

[Bug c/92833] ice for broken C code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92833 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- Something similar for this list of tokens: extern == == ==

[Bug testsuite/92622] FAIL: gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-22.c on ILP32: missing warnings for VLA on lines 67 and 69

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92622 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --

[Bug c++/84255] accepts redefinition of template variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84255 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2018-02-06 00:00:00 |2019-12-5 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan

[Bug c++/92576] Definition of variable template without initializer is treated as declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92576 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/92441] [10 regression] ICE: in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1681

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92441 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/92206] [10 Regression] ICE in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1682 since r277281

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92206 --- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek --- *** Bug 92441 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/84255] accepts redefinition of template variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84255 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug go/92820] [10 Regression] libgo.so.15 has executable stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92820 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug demangler/92453] write buffer overflow in cplus_demangle()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92453 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug libgomp/92835] New: [OpenACC] Run time error with enter./exit data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92835 Bug ID: 92835 Summary: [OpenACC] Run time error with enter./exit data Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: l

A Poster Maker For Your School

Can't see this email?. View in browser

[Bug target/67733] illumos needs a new target triple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67733 --- Comment #7 from Igor Kozhukhov --- i'd like to have DilOS triplets like: Intel: x86_64-dilos/i386-dilos (or for 64bit amd64-dilos) SPARC: sparc64-dilos/sparc-dilos (or sparc32-dilos) (or 64bit: sparcv9-dilos, 32bit: sparcv7-dilos) it one da

[Bug tree-optimization/92768] [8/9/10 Regression] Maybe a wrong code for vector constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92768 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 5 23:53:09 2019 New Revision: 279024 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279024&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/92768 * gcc.dg/pr92768.c: Add -w -Wn

[Bug middle-end/92824] Wrong optimization: representation of long doubles not copied even with memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92824 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu, m68k --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug middle-end/92824] Wrong optimization: representation of long doubles not copied even with memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92824 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- On m68k the padding is internal, and actually part of the representation.

[Bug testsuite/92622] FAIL: gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-22.c on ILP32: missing warnings for VLA on lines 67 and 69

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92622 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Fri Dec 6 00:18:32 2019 New Revision: 279029 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279029&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/92622 - FAIL: gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-22.c on ILP32: missing wa

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 92622, which changed state. Bug 92622 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-22.c on ILP32: missing warnings for VLA on lines 67 and 69 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92622 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/92622] FAIL: gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-22.c on ILP32: missing warnings for VLA on lines 67 and 69

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92622 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug go/92820] [10 Regression] libgo.so.15 has executable stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92820 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at ubuntu dot com --- Comment #8 f

[Bug go/92820] [10 Regression] libgo.so.15 has executable stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92820 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug testsuite/92829] [10 regression] several test case failures starting with r278983

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92829 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- The failures in Warray-bounds-56.c boil down to this test case where the powerpc64 cross-compiler diagnoses only three out of the four buffer overflows, missing the one first one in f(). The native x86_64 co

[Bug testsuite/92829] [10 regression] several test case failures starting with r278983

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92829 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Fri Dec 6 01:04:42 2019 New Revision: 279031 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279031&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR testsuite/92829 - several test case failures starting with r278983 gcc

[Bug c/92826] Impossible to silence warning: non-standard suffix on floating constant [-Wpedantic]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92826 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libfortran/92836] New: segfault with inquire()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92836 Bug ID: 92836 Summary: segfault with inquire() Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortran Assig

[Bug libfortran/92836] segfault with inquire()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92836 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Benson --- Running with -fsanitize=thread (suggested by Tobias) gives: == WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: lock-order-inversion (potential deadlock) (pid=9982) Cycle in lock order graph: M26 (0x7f02bb31c340)

[Bug libfortran/92836] segfault with inquire()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92836 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Benson --- Answers to questions raised by Jerry at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-12/msg00059.html > 1) Are you opening a unique file (by file name) in each thread? No. The code is operating on many files, but

[Bug c++/92837] New: ICE on syntax error in requires clause, in cp_parser_constraint_primary_expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92837 Bug ID: 92837 Summary: ICE on syntax error in requires clause, in cp_parser_constraint_primary_expression Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug libfortran/92836] segfault with inquire()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92836 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libfortran/92836] segfault with inquire()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92836 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- Removing close statement: $ ./a.out 0 8 4 2 8 4 -10 5 8 4 4 8 4

[Bug go/92810] Compiling GCC go for aarch64_be-marvell-linux-gnu fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92810 --- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Fri Dec 6 05:32:49 2019 New Revision: 279032 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279032&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR go/92810 libgo: recognize aarch64_be as arm64be

[Bug tree-optimization/92819] [10 Regression] Worse code generated on avx2 due to simplify_vector_constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92819 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Dec 6 07:53:15 2019 New Revision: 279033 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279033&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-12-06 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/92819

<    1   2