https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66695
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Mar 13 07:21:33 2019
New Revision: 269635
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269635&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-13 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66695
PR fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77746
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Mar 13 07:21:33 2019
New Revision: 269635
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269635&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-13 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66695
PR fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79485
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Mar 13 07:21:33 2019
New Revision: 269635
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269635&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-13 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66695
PR fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89696
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24943
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38998
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2018-03-12 00:00:00 |2019-3-13
--- Comment #2 from Richard B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88588
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 13 08:24:41 2019
New Revision: 269636
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269636&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/88588
* omp-simd-clone.c (ipa_simd_modify_st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89697
Bug ID: 89697
Summary: SRA prevents -Wuninitialized warning
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimizat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49854
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84272
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49854
--- Comment #4 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Yes, it would be nice if those were kept open. There is actually a demand for a
working compiler for the SPE target as it's used in embedded systems.
Luckily, LLVM has improved a bit on the SPE t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89684
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89685
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89688
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89689
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80953
--- Comment #36 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Mar 13 09:05:43 2019
New Revision: 269638
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269638&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/80953
Merge from LLVM revision 355965
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89690
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80953
--- Comment #37 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Mar 13 09:11:46 2019
New Revision: 269639
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269639&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/80953
Merge from LLVM revision 355978
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89691
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
It doesn't handle negative offsets, we're doing
/* Optional constant offset. */
if (c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_PLUS))
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80953
--- Comment #38 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Mar 13 09:15:02 2019
New Revision: 269640
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269640&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/80953
Merge from LLVM revision 355979
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89684
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89691
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Index: gcc/tree-pretty-print.c
===
--- gcc/tree-pretty-print.c (revision 269569)
+++ gcc/tree-pretty-print.c (working copy)
@@ -1830,7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80953
--- Comment #39 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Mar 13 09:19:25 2019
New Revision: 269641
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269641&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/80953
Merge from LLVM revision 355980
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89692
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89693
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89694
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89695
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89677
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
We're analyzing a CHREC of type float, sth the affine machinery isn't really
prepared to handle. The rev in question makes us more defensive but in the
end we're lucky.
Testing a real patch for the issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89695
Matthijs van Duin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|inappropriate copying of|unexpected copying of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89571
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|paolo.carlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89698
Bug ID: 89698
Summary: Run-time error due to optimization of field access
after cast at -Os/-O2 and higher
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89652
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89698
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88534
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89698
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|Host|x86_64-*-*
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89697
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89698
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85558
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Mar 13 10:32:29 2019
New Revision: 269644
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269644&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-13 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/85558
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85558
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89698
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
So the issue may be that
operand_equal_p (*(struct A *) VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(vp),
*(struct B *) VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(vp), 0) == 1
where for INDIRECT_REF we just do
case INDIRECT_REF:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89699
Bug ID: 89699
Summary: [8 regression] false warning -Wstringop-overflow and
memcmp
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89677
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 13 11:32:11 2019
New Revision: 269646
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269646&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-13 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/89677
* tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89677
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.4 |7.5
Summary|[8 Regression] i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89689
--- Comment #2 from Xavier ---
Thanks for the quick answer and for the clear explanation !
I indeed thought about using an assert, I think we will go with the
__builtin_unreachable suggestion.
You motivated me to open a similar issue I found : 89
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89699
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89700
Bug ID: 89700
Summary: Warn if move constructor is not generated and not
deleted
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79618
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|40883 |
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68138
Alexander Haase changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||unsavoryemail at gmail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89693
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89701
Bug ID: 89701
Summary: Provide -fcf-protection=branch,return
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89699
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89497
--- Comment #30 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 13 14:08:07 2019
New Revision: 269650
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269650&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-14 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89677
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 13 14:08:07 2019
New Revision: 269650
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269650&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-14 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89296
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 13 14:08:07 2019
New Revision: 269650
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269650&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-14 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89497
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89634
Bug 89634 depends on bug 89497, which changed state.
Bug 89497 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE caused by Segmentation Fault when
compiling cups 2.2.10 with LTO flags enabled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89497
What|Remo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89702
Bug ID: 89702
Summary: 03 issue with SIGALRM causes program to SEGV on
Solaris
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89692
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89702
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i386-pc-solaris2.10
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89074
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89672
--- Comment #2 from Damon Revoe ---
Oops. Ironically, I checked the man page for whether NULL was a valid
argument. It just didn't occur to me to check the source. Duh.
Thank you for your time!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89378
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89378
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45960
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45960&action=edit
gcc9-pr89378.patch
Untested (quite obvious) fix, though I don't really have a way to test this.
If you could te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89672
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63508
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Mar 13 15:01:00 2019
New Revision: 269651
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269651&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-13 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/63508
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63508
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89700
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Antony Polukhin from comment #0)
> The rules for the warning could be following:
> Issue a warning if at least one of the class members has a move constructor,
> class has a copy constructor an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89672
--- Comment #4 from Damon Revoe ---
And that fact is used by the optimizer. I see. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67398
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89512
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Slightly cleaned up testcase:
struct A {
template
static const int a = 0;
};
struct B {
template
static int foo ()
{
return T::a;
}
};
int bar ()
{
return B::foo ();
}
Outside of a templa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 89699, which changed state.
Bug 89699 Summary: [8/9 Regression] false warning -Wstringop-overflow and memcmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89699
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89699
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89702
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
>Solaris SunOS 5.10
This might mean it is a kernel issue too.
What does gdb show when it crashes?
info registers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89690
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Shouldn't the GIMPLE front-end give a better error message for invalid input?
I realize -fgimple is an experimental feature but it seems that we should at
least aim for the same robust error handling in the f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89662
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Mar 13 17:19:43 2019
New Revision: 269655
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269655&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/89662 - -Warray-bounds ICE on void* arithmetic
gcc/C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89662
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89703
Bug ID: 89703
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in compare_values_warnv, at
tree-vrp.c:997
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89703
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89704
Bug ID: 89704
Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in add_const_value_attribute,
at dwarf2out.c:19685
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89705
Bug ID: 89705
Summary: ICE in convert_like_real, at cp/call.c:7334
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89702
--- Comment #3 from Karl Burgess ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> >Solaris SunOS 5.10
>
> This might mean it is a kernel issue too.
> What does gdb show when it crashes?
> info registers
Program terminated with signal 11, Segme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89696
--- Comment #2 from Khang H. Nguyen ---
okay, thank you for the information, I did not know that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89573
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > I wouldn't expect such a cast to be generated on the result of the
> > multiplication; I'd expect long double to be converted dire
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89696
--- Comment #3 from Khang H. Nguyen ---
Sorry, I just have one more quick question.
Bug 1:
Nonetheless, for read(), I was just wondering, if you read from a list input
then it should be like that.
However, if it is just a raw string and it act
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89703
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89667
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Or if for some reason you need an array of pointers to writable strings,
you can use e.g. (char []) { "foo" }, a compound literal, as the
initializer for such a pointer, instead of a simple
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89705
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89705
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r210436.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
Bug 40883 depends on bug 42689, which changed state.
Bug 42689 Summary: bad formatting of specs diagnostics
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42689
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42689
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89700
Igor Klevanets changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cerevra at yandex dot ru
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48957
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Well, I suppose you could have a new option to say what set of fixed
headers to use, in the case where your sysroot is not based on the one
used when building GCC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89696
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88979
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Mar 13 18:38:45 2019
New Revision: 269656
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269656&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/88979 - further P0634 fix for constructors.
* pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88979
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69807
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 45961
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45961&action=edit
.graphite file
gcc-9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85656
--- Comment #12 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 45962
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45962&action=edit
Tree dump
For
FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c scan-ltrans-tree-dump-not optimized "Function
bar"
on hppa64-h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89706
Bug ID: 89706
Summary: -Wstringop-truncation strncpy message is confusing and
has psuedo-false-positives
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89703
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89696
--- Comment #5 from Khang H. Nguyen ---
> program foo
> integer i
> read(*,*) i
> read(*,'(I4)') i
> end program foo
>
> % gfcx -o z a.f90
> % ./z
> % ./z
> 12 b
> 12 b
> At line 4 of file a.f90 (unit = 5, file = 'stdin')
> Fortran runtime
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
