https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87839
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2018-11-01 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87762
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Leoshkevich ---
Martin, I believe I fixed this one. Could you please give it another try?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87839
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 44994
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44994&action=edit
gcc9-pr87839.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87762
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87988
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88001
Bug ID: 88001
Summary: ASMCONS cannot handle properly UNSPEC(CONST)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87989
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88001
Claudiu Zissulescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||claziss at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87918
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 13 09:45:50 2018
New Revision: 266062
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266062&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/87918
* simplify-rtx.c (simplify_merge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728
Martin Beeger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pizzard at online dot de
--- Comment #63
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40380
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Busg like this make me wonder if we wouldn't be better simply replacing our
Doxygen API docs with a link to cppreference.com which is far more complete and
has better formatting and cross referencing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87995
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87996
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87988
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 44995
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44995&action=edit
untested patch
It's surprisingly difficult to hack around things ... but the attached at least
survives lto.ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925
--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou ---
> (so pretty much the same, but the previous runs had some weird pollution).
Thanks, slightly better though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87967
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
No, it's different. We somehow fail to make a 2nd PHI in the vectorization of
the inner loop.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87974
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
No, it's different. We somehow fail to make a 2nd PHI in the vectorization of
the inner loop.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88002
Bug ID: 88002
Summary: libbacktrace and libiberty tests don't use dejagnu
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87967
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> No, it's different. We somehow fail to make a 2nd PHI in the vectorization
> of the inner loop.
Err, wrong bug.
(gdb) p debug_gimple_stmt (from_phi)
prephitm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88003
Bug ID: 88003
Summary: ICE on outside definition of inner function-local
class in poplevel_class, at cp/name-lookup.c:4325
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87988
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Thanks, I will give it a try. Note that the numbers I posted are from trunk
and trunk with abstract origin streaming disabled. Thanks to the type
streaming reorg we do not have overall regression relative to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87817
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88004
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot
gnu.org
Targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88004
Bug ID: 88004
Summary: [9 Regression] lto1: error: node differs from
node->decl->decl_with_vis.symtab_node
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyword
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88004
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 44996
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44996&action=edit
Callgraph dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87817
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
E.g. in simplify-rtx.c we have:
case SIGN_EXTRACT:
case ZERO_EXTRACT:
if (CONST_INT_P (op0)
&& CONST_INT_P (op1)
&& CONST_INT_P (op2)
&& is_a (mode, &int_mode)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88005
Bug ID: 88005
Summary: [6/7/8/9] Regression GCC on hppa misoptimisation
function pointer call
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87993
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87992
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87991
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Related to/duplicate of pr87881/pr87945/pr87993.
> Changed between 20181028 and 20181104 (ICE).
Parameter inquiry has been introduced at revision r265729: before it gave the
error
Error: Unexpected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86991
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
So the reason in the end is failure to tear down a half-built reduction chain.
I have a fix (finally).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87993
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Related to/duplicate of pr87881/pr87945/pr87994.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Related to/duplicate of pr87993 and pr87994.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87967
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 13 13:50:18 2018
New Revision: 266070
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266070&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-13 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/87967
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87967
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87962
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 13 13:51:34 2018
New Revision: 266071
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266071&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-13 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/87962
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87962
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88005
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||hppa
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87988
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
OK, I'd rather not put this hack on trunk. Iff then a very limited scope
TREE_DIE (same cases as the hack) should be brought in.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88006
Bug ID: 88006
Summary: -fdebug-types-section gives undefined reference
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: deb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88002
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
I really have no intention of running the libbacktrace tests under DejaGNU.
But if someone wants to copy the .sum file generation out of libgo (which also
does not use DejaGNU), that would be fine with me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87817
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88005
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87930
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Nov 13 15:03:58 2018
New Revision: 266073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266073&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Do not allow -mabi=ms and -fsanitize={,kernel-}address (PR sanitizer/87930
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87930
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87931
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87931
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 13 15:07:53 2018
New Revision: 266075
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266075&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-13 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/87931
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87885
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Nov 13 15:06:54 2018
New Revision: 266074
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266074&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Improve -fprofile-report.
2018-11-13 Martin Liska
PR tree-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87885
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48200
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88005
--- Comment #2 from Nick Hudson ---
yes, it does.
Nick
nick@zoom:~/gcc$ ./inst/bin/hppa--linux-gcc -O2 -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks
-S -o pdc.s pdc.i
nick@zoom:~/gcc$ cat pdc.s
.LEVEL 1.1
.text
.align 4
.globl pdc_in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88005
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88005
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2018-11-13 10:21 a.m., skrll at netbsd dot org wrote:
> yes, it does.
So, the bug should be closed.
Dave
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87898
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87955
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Nov 13 15:59:57 2018
New Revision: 266079
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266079&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix ICE with -fopt-info-inline (PR ipa/87955)
PR ipa/87955 reports a p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87955
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87718
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87552
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88007
Bug ID: 88007
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in gt_ggc_m_S, at ggc-page.c:1474
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: GC, ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86991
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 13 16:14:37 2018
New Revision: 266081
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266081&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-13 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/86991
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86991
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[8/9 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88000
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88007
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86383
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87899
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- |https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87507
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- |https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87932
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78244
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79440
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #3 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86718
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994
--- Comment #3 from G. Steinmetz ---
Sure ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86528
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhonghao at pku dot org.cn
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88008
Bug ID: 88008
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in check_typebound_baseobject, at
fortran/resolve.c:6058
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87870
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88009
Bug ID: 88009
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in find_intrinsic_vtab, at
fortran/class.c:2761
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88010
Bug ID: 88010
Summary: noinline function alias unexpectedly inlined
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88010
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.1.0, 8.2.0, 9.0
--- Comment #1 from Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86739
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88011
Bug ID: 88011
Summary: [9 regression] r266028 causes a bunch of go failures
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86739
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45000
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45000&action=edit
gcc9-pr86739.patch
This works for me (well, make in gcc/ with recent gcc still builds and the
preprocessed sour
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86739
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45001
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45001&action=edit
gcc9-pr86739-2.patch
Variant patch if the conversion operator would not be acceptable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81824
--- Comment #15 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Nov 13 19:57:51 2018
New Revision: 266084
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266084&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/81824 - Warn for missing attributes with function aliases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48886
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
I'm afraid I didn't investigate to tell whether problems were fixed or latent,
I just observed that the test passed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87011
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68836
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Thanks.
Hmm, tricky. There's no inlining, and debug info is as complete as one could
get. The problem is that the registers holding the variables are
call-clobbered, and the variables are dead after the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87996
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87824
--- Comment #9 from Johannes Pfau ---
Fix for the loadDR failure: https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/pull/767
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81454
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88012
Bug ID: 88012
Summary: Expected -Wnarrowing not given inside template class
method
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88012
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78244
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vz-gcc at zeitlins dot org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78244
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Testcase from 88012:
using Number = unsigned int;
template
struct S {
S() {
const Number x = {-1};
(void)x;
}
};
int main()
{
S<1> s;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87899
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Tue Nov 13 22:14:11 2018
New Revision: 266086
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266086&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/87899
* lra-lives.c (start_livi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87899
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68561
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|mpolacek at gcc d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86594
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
For some weird reason this got fixed by my r265734.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88007
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87824
--- Comment #10 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Johannes Pfau from comment #9)
> Fix for the loadDR failure: https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/pull/767
Could you post that to gcc-patches?
Should probably get write after approval for yo
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
