https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87988
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Created attachment 44995 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44995&action=edit untested patch It's surprisingly difficult to hack around things ... but the attached at least survives lto.exp testing. Can you see if it fixes the regression? I very much expect it to break FAT objects since I "wreck" abstract origins in a way others may not be hapoy about.
