https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87577
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84094
Bug 84094 depends on bug 87577, which changed state.
Bug 87577 Summary: [9 regression] hundreds of fortran test case failures
starting with revision r264990
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87577
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87364
--- Comment #9 from Christophe Lyon ---
Author: clyon
Date: Fri Oct 12 07:38:05 2018
New Revision: 265078
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265078&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix typo in previous commit.
2018-10-12 Christophe Lyon
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87589
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |8.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87596
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code, ra
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67125
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87441
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
This is enough:
template
concept bool HasBinaryAdd = requires(X x, Y y)
{
{x + y} -> decltype(x + y);
};
void proc(HasBinaryAdd x, HasBinaryAdd y);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87597
Bug ID: 87597
Summary: wrong result with matmul inlining
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87441
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Related to PR67147
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86269
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
Related to PR67147.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71128
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini ---
*** Bug 71129 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71129
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 71129, which changed state.
Bug 71129 Summary: [concepts] ICE on ill-formed explicit instantiation of a
variable concept
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71129
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82794
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
Related to PR67147.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87582
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Unless it's also fixed on the gcc-7-branch, it will be in 8.3 and 9.1, whenever
those releases happen.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87597
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78330
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I suspect that GCC and Clang simply forget the names of the
template-parameter-list as soon as it's been parsed, because those
names have no purpose and can't be referred to outside that
template-paramete
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82803
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
Bug ID: 87598
Summary: [8/9 Regression] Rejects "%a0" with constant
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64, powerpc64le
Known to work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87597
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86968
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #13)
> > Forgive my naive question as I'm not too familiar with that part of the
> > compiler: why should the get_best_mem_extraction_insn be guarded with
> > rev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86844
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86968
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Right makes sense. So I tried your suggestion (guard the first if with
> !reverse but not the second) and it didn't work. Problem as you suggested is
> adjust_bit_field_mem_for_reg which refuses to do an u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71020
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54278
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.4 |6.5
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77854
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77854
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 12 11:35:03 2018
New Revision: 265081
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265081&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/77854 document size_type for containers
PR libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77854
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 12 11:36:18 2018
New Revision: 265082
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265082&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/77854 document size_type for containers
PR libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85098
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 12 11:37:46 2018
New Revision: 265083
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265083&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/85098 add missing definitions for static constants
In C++1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77854
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 12 11:37:51 2018
New Revision: 265084
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265084&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/77854 document size_type for containers
PR libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71290
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54278
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71290
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I don't think we want to backport this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77975
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69698
Bug 69698 depends on bug 71290, which changed state.
Bug 71290 Summary: [6 Regression] Flexible array member is not diagnosed with
-pedantic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71290
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71290
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74563
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80110
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72766
Bug 72766 depends on bug 71121, which changed state.
Bug 71121 Summary: [6 Regression] Spurious warning: "the address of [...] will
never be NULL [-Waddress]"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71121
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 71121, which changed state.
Bug 71121 Summary: [6 Regression] Spurious warning: "the address of [...] will
never be NULL [-Waddress]"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71121
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71121
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74563
--- Comment #14 from Maciej W. Rozycki ---
Matthew is no longer at Imagination/MIPS and has nothing to do with MIPS
processors anymore. And me neither.
Also I have lost the ability to run GCC regression testing, not at least
without getting set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85098
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.4 |6.5
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77849
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70966
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 12 12:28:30 2018
New Revision: 265085
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265085&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/70966 make pmr::new_delete_resource() immortal
Construct th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78595
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 12 12:28:48 2018
New Revision: 265088
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265088&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/78595 implement insertion into maps in terms of emplace
C+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87061
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 12 12:28:36 2018
New Revision: 265086
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265086&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix experimental::pmr typedefs and add tests
The typedefs in and don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77537
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 12 12:28:54 2018
New Revision: 265089
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265089&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86751 default assignment operators for std::pair
The solut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86751
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 12 12:28:54 2018
New Revision: 265089
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265089&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86751 default assignment operators for std::pair
The soluti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87597
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87522
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Oct 12 12:34:36 2018
New Revision: 265090
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265090&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386: Don't pass -msse2avx to assembler for -mavx
With
gcc -O2 -f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87597
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> Workaround: use -fno-frontend-optimize.
Or replace:
complex, dimension(0:3,0:3), parameter :: gamma5
by
complex, dimension(1:4,1:4), parameter :: ga
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87517
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Oct 12 12:38:28 2018
New Revision: 265091
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265091&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386: Correct _mm512_mask3_fmaddsub_round_pd
Define _mm512_mask3_f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85118
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87061
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 12 12:51:29 2018
New Revision: 265093
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265093&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix experimental::pmr typedefs and add tests
The typedefs in and don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86751
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 12 12:51:46 2018
New Revision: 265096
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265096&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86751 default assignment operators for std::pair
The soluti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78595
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 12 12:51:40 2018
New Revision: 265095
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265095&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/78595 implement insertion into maps in terms of emplace
C+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70966
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 12 12:51:20 2018
New Revision: 265092
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265092&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/70966 make pmr::new_delete_resource() immortal
Construct th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77537
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 12 12:51:46 2018
New Revision: 265096
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265096&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86751 default assignment operators for std::pair
The solut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42000
Bug 42000 depends on bug 79345, which changed state.
Bug 79345 Summary: [6 Regression] passing yet-uninitialized member as argument
to base class constructor should warn (-Wunitialized)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79345
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79345
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70966
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 12 13:04:24 2018
New Revision: 265097
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265097&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/70966 make pmr::new_delete_resource() immortal
Construct th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87061
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 12 13:04:38 2018
New Revision: 265098
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265098&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix experimental::pmr typedefs and add tests
The typedefs in and don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70966
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |6.5
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78595
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |7.4
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815
--- Comment #11 from Gianfranco ---
I would avoid an OOM issue, because even trying to compile a single file makes
it fail...
I'm trying again the same build with updated gcc and I'll report back.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87597
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
Internally, the problem is in frontend-passes.c's
scalarized_expr(matrix_b)
matrix_b starts as EXPR_VARIABLE with AR_FULL array reference for which a call
to
lbound(matrix_b, dim=1)
is generated. That's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87024
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Oct 12 13:41:56 2018
New Revision: 265100
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265100&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-12 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86505
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Oct 12 13:41:56 2018
New Revision: 265100
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265100&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-12 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80032
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54278
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54278
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Oct 12 13:44:35 2018
New Revision: 265101
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265101&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-12 Richard Biener
PR c++/54278
Backport fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80032
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Oct 12 13:44:35 2018
New Revision: 265101
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265101&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-12 Richard Biener
PR c++/54278
Backport fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82803
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87599
Bug ID: 87599
Summary: Broadcasting scalar to vector uses stack unnecessarily
on x86
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87599
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Try with -mtune=intel. So AMD cores are faster with the move between gpr and
sse register sets via memory rather than direct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87599
--- Comment #2 from vgatherps at gmail dot com ---
Thanks! That fixes the optimization. However, using something like
-march=haswell or -march=corei7 does not result in this optimization being
made, which as far as I know -march= would imply -mtun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86208
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 12 14:43:18 2018
New Revision: 265103
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265103&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-07-16 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3698
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 12 14:43:18 2018
New Revision: 265103
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265103&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-07-16 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86660
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 12 14:46:18 2018
New Revision: 265105
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265105&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-07-26 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86421
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 12 14:47:57 2018
New Revision: 265106
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265106&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-07-10 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86539
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 12 14:49:32 2018
New Revision: 265107
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265107&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-07-17 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86542
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 12 14:52:18 2018
New Revision: 265108
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265108&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-07-17 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86627
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 12 14:53:11 2018
New Revision: 265109
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265109&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-07-24 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87065
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 12 14:53:54 2018
New Revision: 265110
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265110&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-08-27 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87248
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8/9 Regression] Bad|[6/7 Regression] Bad code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87550
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 12 14:55:17 2018
New Revision: 265112
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265112&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-10-10 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87600
Bug ID: 87600
Summary: Fix for PRs 86939 and 87479 causes build issues for
several targets
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87600
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87600
--- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner ---
Pasting some edited commentary from the gcc-patches mailing list:
On 10/8/18 9:52 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> My tester is showing a variety of problems as well. hppa, sh4, aarch64,
> aarch64_be, alpha arm* and s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87599
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87600
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Fri Oct 12 16:31:11 2018
New Revision: 265113
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265113&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/87600
* ira-lives (non_conflicting_r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65657
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 87376 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87376
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.creekmore@synapse-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87455
--- Comment #5 from Fanael ---
Created attachment 44829
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44829&action=edit
WIP patch
> We already have TARGET_SSE_TYPELESS_STORES for stores, so perhaps we want
> something like typeless reg-r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86677
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Wil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87376
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Unfortunately, the solution from above won't work for PR65657, an issue that is
basically the same: early use of explicit hard-regs and propagations from TER.
Hence -fno-tree-ter can be used as work-aroun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86677
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On October 12, 2018 6:57:44 PM GMT+02:00, "wilco at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86677
>
>Wilco changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84423
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8/9 Regression]|[6/7/8 Regression]
|[c
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo