https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85967
Bug ID: 85967
Summary: [ARM] No unwinding support for division functions
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85967
--- Comment #1 from Ladislav Michl ---
Created attachment 44205
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44205&action=edit
SIGFPE test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85950
--- Comment #4 from Allan Jensen ---
Btw, I found this while trying to figure out why std::round() wasn't also
optimized to a single roundss instruction, is that just a missing optimization
or is there a quirk about that that makes them not fit?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85958
--- Comment #1 from Jonny Grant ---
My idea of what would be clearest is :-
Cannot pass ‘const int‘ as ‘int&‘ (non const)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85759
--- Comment #18 from Stefan Talpalaru ---
Another clue emerged: the ICE appears only when the same source file is
compiled multiple times.
When building the extensions, Python replaces the boring Makefile with its own
"distutils" build tool that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85739
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85759
--- Comment #20 from Martin Liška ---
Patch candidate:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-05/msg01608.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85759
--- Comment #19 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Stefan Talpalaru from comment #18)
> Another clue emerged: the ICE appears only when the same source file is
> compiled multiple times.
>
> When building the extensions, Python replaces the bori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85955
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85964
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85956
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85954
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85953
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85953
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, started with r228368.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85954
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85950
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Allan Jensen from comment #4)
> Btw, I found this while trying to figure out why std::round() wasn't also
> optimized to a single roundss instruction, is that just a missing
> optimization or is th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85955
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85956
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |8.2
Summary|[9 Regression] IC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85964
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
The original testcase looked like this:
int t8;
void
il (void)
{
int uu = 8;
do
{
int yq = 8;
do
{
t8 /= (t8 < 2) ? 1 : 3;
--yq;
}
while (yq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85960
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85953
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85964
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.2
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85958
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85964
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85961
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83009
avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85961
--- Comment #2 from bki at hacon dot de ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> To me it shoulds you are messing with the ABI behind GCCs back.
True.
I'd still argue that the SysV-ABI suggests that a caller would need to save and
resto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85968
Bug ID: 85968
Summary: gcc/config/arc/arc.c:9805: bad test ?
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85965
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
There's nothing that can be done here. The error comes from the library (not
the compiler) and there's no way the compiler can possibly say "the static
assertion would have passed if the __is_invocable trai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85969
Bug ID: 85969
Summary: avr/gen-avr-mmcu-specs.c:56: unused function ?
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85918
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue May 29 11:58:24 2018
New Revision: 260893
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260893&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85918
* tree.def (VEC_UNPACK_FIX_TRUNC_HI_EXPR,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85970
Bug ID: 85970
Summary: Cannot move a std::unique_ptr to insert into a map
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85970
Jose Dapena Paz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
--- Comment #1 from Jose Dap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85971
Bug ID: 85971
Summary: Really Simple "If" with one function call inside is
not optimized efficiently
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85972
Bug ID: 85972
Summary: cr16/predicates.md:163: bad if test ?
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85759
--- Comment #21 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue May 29 12:11:21 2018
New Revision: 260895
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260895&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libgcov: report about a different timestamp (PR gcov-profile/85759).
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85971
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85970
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82522
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jose.dapena at lge dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85964
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, it's not this part of CFG cleanup but the remove_edge_and_domiated_blocks
call in cleanup_control_expr_graph. With the reduced testcase we call it
around
2000 times.
The FSM thing of course is separate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85964
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
For the FSM part since we walk the whole function for _each_ control stmt name
this analysis part, find_jump_threads_backwards (basic_block bb, bool speed_p),
is quadratic in the number of BBs.
There's limi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85973
Bug ID: 85973
Summary: [[nodiscard]] shall emit a warning for unused
anonymous variable
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85960
--- Comment #2 from Gianni Tedesco ---
Both gcc-7.3 and gcc-8 from ubuntu on x86-64:
gcc version 8.0.1 20180414 (experimental) [trunk revision 259383] (Ubuntu
8-20180414-1ubuntu2)
gcc version 7.3.0 (Ubuntu 7.3.0-16ubuntu3)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85960
--- Comment #3 from Gianni Tedesco ---
Both gcc-7.3 and gcc-8 from ubuntu on x86-64:
gcc version 8.0.1 20180414 (experimental) [trunk revision 259383] (Ubuntu
8-20180414-1ubuntu2)
gcc version 7.3.0 (Ubuntu 7.3.0-16ubuntu3)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85970
Jose Dapena Paz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #3 from Jose Dape
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85960
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85974
Bug ID: 85974
Summary: Failure to optimize difference of two pointers into a
compile time constant
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85950
--- Comment #6 from Allan Jensen ---
Btw, I have tested and the patch works for my cases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85974
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
In match.pd
(simplify
- (pointer_diff (convert?@2 @0) (convert?@3 ADDR_EXPR@1))
+ (pointer_diff (convert?@2 @0) (convert1?@3 ADDR_EXPR@1))
(that is, we can have only one cast, not just 0 or 2)
and similarly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85975
Bug ID: 85975
Summary: Incorrect size for spread array
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85976
Bug ID: 85976
Summary: ICE in cp_tree_equal when building Blitz. May be
nested templates.
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85976
--- Comment #1 from matthew.hambley at metoffice dot gov.uk ---
Created attachment 44207
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44207&action=edit
Processed source file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85977
Bug ID: 85977
Summary: Incorrect handling of array reference size deduction
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85978
Bug ID: 85978
Summary: config/frv/frv.c: 3 * iffy code in switch
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85793
bin cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85979
Bug ID: 85979
Summary: Diagnostic says "__alignof" when the source says
"alignof"
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85931
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85952
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue May 29 17:07:57 2018
New Revision: 260899
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260899&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85952
* init.c (build_aggr_init): For structured bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85963
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85957
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53281
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
N.B. comment 6 is the subject of PR 85958 which is really a different bug to
this one. This is about invalid member function calls on cv-qualified objects,
and 85958 is about invalid attempts to bind refere
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85883
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue May 29 17:44:07 2018
New Revision: 260901
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260901&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85883
* init.c (build_new): Handle deducing a cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85883
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85961
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85976
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85976
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r251438.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85977
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85980
Bug ID: 85980
Summary: suboptimal code for strncmp for powerpc64
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85889
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85888
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue May 29 18:29:04 2018
New Revision: 260902
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260902&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/85888 - New test case c-c++-common/attr-nonstring-6.c from
r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85888
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85981
Bug ID: 85981
Summary: ICE in gfc_trans_string_copy, at
fortran/trans-expr.c:6539
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85981
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
Works with character(kind=1) :
$ cat z2.f90
program p
integer, allocatable :: arr(:)
integer :: stat
character(len=128, kind=1) :: errmsg = ' '
allocate (arr(3), stat=stat, errmsg=errmsg)
pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85950
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue May 29 18:35:34 2018
New Revision: 260903
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260903&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85950
* config/i386/i386.md (l2):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85982
Bug ID: 85982
Summary: ICE in resolve_component, at fortran/resolve.c:13696
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85982
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
Comparison sample :
$ cat z2.f90
program p
type t
integer :: a
integer, external, pointer :: b
end type
end
$ gfortran-9-20180527 -c z2.f90
z2.f90:4:23:
integer, external, pointe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85983
Bug ID: 85983
Summary: ICE in check_dtio_interface1, at
fortran/interface.c:4748
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85981
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85984
Bug ID: 85984
Summary: ICE in create_pseudo_cfg, at dwarf2cfi.c:2874
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85889
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85961
--- Comment #4 from bki at hacon dot de ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #3)
> You'd need to disable IPA-RA after forcing -O2 with the pragma, i.e.:
>
> #pragma GCC optimize "O2"
> #pragma GCC optimize "no-ipa-ra"
Yes, this change
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85985
Bug ID: 85985
Summary: GCC >= 5.6 unaligned movaps
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85985
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The alignment requirement for struct bbb is 64bytes but you cast a non aligned
data to that type.
This is undefined code since the type has an alignment requirement.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85985
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85981
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Assignee|unassign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85985
--- Comment #3 from Valentin Petrov ---
Thanks, just to clarify. Do I understand correctly that the alignment
requirement for bbb comes from __attribute__ (aligned) in aaa ?? (attribute
makes a3 to be aligned, which makes aaa to be 64b aligned, w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85985
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Valentin Petrov from comment #3)
> Thanks, just to clarify. Do I understand correctly that the alignment
> requirement for bbb comes from __attribute__ (aligned) in aaa ?? (attribute
> makes a3 t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67445
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue May 29 20:04:52 2018
New Revision: 260905
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260905&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67445 - returning temporary initializer_list.
PR c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48562
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue May 29 20:04:52 2018
New Revision: 260905
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260905&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67445 - returning temporary initializer_list.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67711
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue May 29 20:04:52 2018
New Revision: 260905
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260905&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67445 - returning temporary initializer_list.
PR c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85981
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 07:53:33PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> I have a patch.
>
I have new patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85976
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Perhaps cp_tree_equal should just handle USING_DECL like other DECLs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85975
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85984
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85986
Bug ID: 85986
Summary: config/rl78/rl78.c:984: bad test ?
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85987
Bug ID: 85987
Summary: cstore does not work with a store in one of the
branches
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85971
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||85987
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85986
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dj at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53281
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
My patch fails to account for ref-qualifiers on the member function, so needs
some improvement.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85964
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] Compile|compile time hog w/ -O3
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
