https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
--- Comment #5 from Vittorio Zecca ---
After applying the fix in comment 3 to trunk 258946 the ICE disappears
and an error message appears, as it should be.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61907
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 61907, which changed state.
Bug 61907 Summary: load of invalid value for 'bool' in trans-array.c
trans_array_constructor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61907
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 61910, which changed state.
Bug 61910 Summary: undefined computation in trans-expr.c gfc_conv_cst_int_power
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61910
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61910
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85149
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50541
--- Comment #6 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Bug still there in 7.3.0 and trunk 258946.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50550
--- Comment #5 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Bug still present in 7.3.0 and trunk 258946.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50550
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Bug still present in 7.3.0 and trunk 258946.
While closing PRs that have been fixed is very useful, making noise about PRs
marked as NEW is a waste of time for everybody.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50550
--- Comment #7 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Sorry about that, long time I did not blush, I'll try to remember the lesson.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85100
--- Comment #10 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Apr 2 12:03:16 2018
New Revision: 259006
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259006&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386: Enable AVX/AVX512 features only if supported by OSXSAVE
Ena
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85100
--- Comment #11 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Apr 2 12:09:48 2018
New Revision: 259007
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259007&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386: Enable AVX/AVX512 features only if supported by OSXSAVE
Ena
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85100
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85155
Bug ID: 85155
Summary: Suboptimal error messages when using noexcept(false)
on defaulted dtor
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85156
Bug ID: 85156
Summary: -O1 -g internal compiler error: gimplification failed
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72709
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
This works:
program show_problem
implicit none
character(len=:), dimension(:), allocatable :: text
allocate(character(len=3) :: text(3))
text(1) = 'abc'
text(2) = '123'
print *,text(
I've invited you to fill out the following form:
Professional Profile
To fill it out, visit:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfQTZkrylE1t49gjzewPQSPWHFnPtGCZfRujg_G8VTwqGrbHg/viewform?c=0&w=1&usp=mail_form_link
Dear friend,
I am a master's student in Computer Science at the Federal Uni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85157
Bug ID: 85157
Summary: [parloops] Prevent canonicalize_loop_ivs failure in
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85157
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Summary|[parloops] Prevent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78352
René J.V. Bertin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rjvbertin at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83126
--- Comment #13 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #12)
> I suppose it is fixed.
Filed PR85157 - "[parloops] Prevent canonicalize_loop_ivs failure in
gen_parallel_loop" to fix this in an optimal way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84912
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.4
--- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80546
--- Comment #13 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Mon Apr 2 14:35:07 2018
New Revision: 259009
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259009&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2018-03-30 Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83822
acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80546
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80546
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #15 from Peter Bergne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81143
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Mon Apr 2 15:24:01 2018
New Revision: 259011
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259011&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2018-02-08 Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85102
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Apr 2 16:47:48 2018
New Revision: 259014
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259014&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-04-02 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/85102
* decl.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85102
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64095
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85138
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
-multilib --disable-werror
--enable-checking=df,extra,fold,rtl,yes --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.1 20180402 (experimental) (GCC)
$
Then I get:
$ ~/gcc/results/bin/gcc -c -w -O3 bug424.c
../../trunk/gcc/tree-data-ref.c:3758:26: runtime error: signed integer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85138
--- Comment #8 from kargl at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu ---
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 05:50:30PM +, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
> First, I have renamed the function "len" to "llen" in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85138
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
OK, so I am beginning to understand...
Part of the problem seems that, in check_pure_function,
else if (gfc_pure (NULL))
{
gfc_error ("Reference to impure function %qs at %L "
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64095
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Apr 2 18:20:04 2018
New Revision: 259015
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259015&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/64095 - auto... parameter pack.
* parser.c (cp_par
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84912
--- Comment #10 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Mon Apr 2 19:19:37 2018
New Revision: 259016
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259016&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2018-03-28 Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64095
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85149
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85142
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85159
Bug ID: 85159
Summary: if constexpr error about goto
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85160
Bug ID: 85160
Summary: GCC generates mvn/and instructions instead of bic on
aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimizat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85161
Bug ID: 85161
Summary: [8 regression] Test case failures in libbacktrace on
powerpc64 BE starting with r253456
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84660
--- Comment #8 from Jim Wilson ---
Author: wilson
Date: Mon Apr 2 22:37:21 2018
New Revision: 259019
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259019&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
RISC-V: Fix for combine bug with shift and AND operations.
PR rtl-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84660
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85142
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
"." is correct for the default multilib in the non-OS directory
arrangements, just not in the OS directory arrangements.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84912
--- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Mon Apr 2 23:54:20 2018
New Revision: 259021
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259021&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2018-03-28 Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84912
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #12 from Peter Bergne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67400
Romain Geissler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot
com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85142
--- Comment #9 from Jim Wilson ---
On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 23:50 +, joseph at codesourcery dot com
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85142
>
> --- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com codesourcery dot com> ---
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85162
Bug ID: 85162
Summary: Vector extensions generating incorrect assembly
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85163
Bug ID: 85163
Summary: [GCOV] A call statement with '==' , '||', and '&&'
operators is wrongly marked as executed twice
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85162
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
If you believe this is incorrect, you should be able to extend the testcase
with an assert somewhere showing that the result is wrong.
For vectors, as documented, comparisons return a vector of 0 (false) and -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64327
--- Comment #9 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Sorry for the delay in answering but I was traveling.
I cannot reproduce on version 7, while it reproduces on 6.4.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64920
--- Comment #4 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Sorry for late answer, but I was traveling.
I did not see it any longer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85158
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
56 matches
Mail list logo
