https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85050
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||53947
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85076
Bug ID: 85076
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with invalid template used as
lambda argument
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recove
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85057
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85059
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Note that -Og is to optimize the debugging experience _while still optimizing_.
In that sense the aim is to be more like -O1 for runtime performance but more
like -O0 for debugging experience. Those are of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85062
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85057
--- Comment #2 from Moritz Kreutzer ---
Created attachment 43752
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43752&action=edit
Example which GCC fails to vectorize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85063
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
I agree that following the language standard shouldn't probibit the middle-end
from doing its own things so IMHO this bug is INVALID.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85066
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85066
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85066
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 26 08:18:43 2018
New Revision: 258851
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258851&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-26 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/85066
* gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85068
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85067
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43514
Matthias Kretz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85062
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85074
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85076
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85057
--- Comment #3 from Moritz Kreutzer ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Attachment is missing.
Thanks! I could swear that I uploaded the attachment in the first place, but it
seems like I forgot to click the button to actually att
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85067
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85068
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85072
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85063
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
Summary|Switch conversi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #39 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 43753
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43753&action=edit
gcc-5 backport patch
There's been some interest in a backport of the patch to gcc-5 and gcc-7
branches.
Since I'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85068
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #40 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 43755
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43755&action=edit
gcc-7 backport patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85072
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
So I did a stupid search for live_reload_and_inheritance_pseudos in
lra-assigns.c
and found a single use here:
static int
find_hard_regno_for_1 (int regno, int *cost, int try_only_hard_regno,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85067
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
The below, very lightly tested so far, should work fine, adjusts
DECL_DECLARED_CONSTEXPR_P as we used to do - before r253321 - a few lines below
before returning. Jakub, I'm in the middle of a few other thing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85070
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48701
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Kretz ---
Updated test case at https://godbolt.org/g/D5P1N1.
`testLoad` was fixed with 4.7.
`testStore` still combines via the stack.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85063
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, patch
--- Comment #9 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85076
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85072
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Doing a more "correct" patch like below shows that nearly all possible
"starts" are covered:
(gdb) p bitmap_count_bits(starts)
$2 = 500039
(gdb) p max_regno - lra_constraint_new_regno_start
$4 = 505207
so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85076
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'd go with:
--- gcc/cp/tree.c.jj2018-03-21 21:18:31.738351376 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/tree.c 2018-03-26 11:22:47.067967708 +0200
@@ -1078,6 +1078,9 @@ cp_build_reference_type (tree to_type, b
{
tree l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85076
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Or in forward_parm itself, right after 'tree type = TREE_TYPE (parm);' would be
very safe too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85057
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85076
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> That matches what build_pointer_type and build_reference_type do as well.
Then, I say, let's definitely go with that!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85076
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85063
--- Comment #10 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Mon Mar 26 09:45:49 2018
New Revision: 258852
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258852&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix switch conversion in offloading functions
2018-03-26 Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85063
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85063
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84592
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[openacc,openmp] lto1: ICE |[openacc,openmp] lto1: ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85077
Bug ID: 85077
Summary: V[248][SD]F abs not optimized to
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85061
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43757
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43757&action=edit
gcc8-pr85061.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83789
--- Comment #27 from kaushikp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I have verified the backported patch to GCC-7 and it fixes the issues
I had observed earlier.
Thanks again Peter for this!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85050
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> IIRC there's a related bug with regard to double <-> float conversions and
> SSE
> vectorization. Can't find it right now.
PR 36844?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85050
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > IIRC there's a related bug with regard to double <-> float conversions and
> > SSE
> > vectorization. Can't find it right no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85046
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 43758
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43758&action=edit
another example
I've further altered the testcase. This one ICEs at #3 all the way back to
gcc-5 (at least).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85070
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85077
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85077
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |c++
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78200
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43759
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43759&action=edit
gcc8-pr78200.patch
Does this patch make any difference on the benchmark?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85047
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
I've invited you to fill out the following form:
Professional Profile
To fill it out, visit:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfQTZkrylE1t49gjzewPQSPWHFnPtGCZfRujg_G8VTwqGrbHg/viewform?c=0&w=1&usp=mail_form_link
Dear friend,
I am a master's student in Computer Science at the Federal Uni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84948
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85077
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Kretz ---
Ouch, right I didn't think of non-finite values.
I.e. -0 < 0 is false...
However, this is what I wanted:
abs(-inf) -> inf
abs( inf) -> inf
abs( nan) -> nan
abs( -0) -> 0
abs( 0) -> 0
The sign bit manip
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85077
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Kretz ---
Oh, there seems to be a regression in GCC 8. In 7 it works as you say. In 8 I
can't get the andps to show up
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85030
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] internal |[6/7 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #66 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #63)
> --- gcc/dwarf2out.c 2018-03-11 17:48:53.498068316 +0100
> +++ gcc/dwarf2out.c 2018-03-13 10:58:03.477514623 +0100
> @@ -28282,6 +28282,7 @@ output_macinfo (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Andrew, a friendly ping on this. The #c13 patch looks like a good progress,
what happened to it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78568
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||deferred
Target Milestone|6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31852
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Mar 26 13:09:10 2018
New Revision: 258854
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258854&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add workaround to std::variant for Clang bug 31852
* include/std
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84786
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Kretz ---
There seems to be a similar bug for vpsrlw and vpsllw. Do you need a testcase?
(It's hard to hit the bug... just had one occur on a Travis CI build)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85077
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85074
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
We have default TARGET_USE_LOCAL_THUNK_ALIAS_P and
TARGET_ASM_CAN_OUTPUT_MI_THUNK is default_can_output_mi_thunk_no_vcall().
if (!this_adjusting
|| !targetm.asm_out.can_output_mi_thunk (thunk_fnd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85078
Bug ID: 85078
Summary: LTO ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl
minimal' structure, have 'identifier_node' in
decl_mangling_context, at cp/mangle.c:878
Product
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85049
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85049
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 26 14:37:50 2018
New Revision: 258856
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258856&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85049 - ICE with __integer_pack.
* pt.c (unify_pac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85062
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84786
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Matthias Kretz from comment #8)
> There seems to be a similar bug for vpsrlw and vpsllw. Do you need a
> testcase? (It's hard to hit the bug... just had one occur on a Travis CI
> build)
I don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #32 from Andrey Guskov ---
Created attachment 43761
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43761&action=edit
Dump as requested in #c31
Jakub, see the attachment. This is the log of what I get, packed in 7Z.
At a glance,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #33 from Andrey Guskov ---
This is the full execution line I used to produce the log in question, and with
which the test continues failing:
$ gfortran -fdump-tree-all -fdump-rtl-all -m64 -c -o sw_absorption.fppized.o
-march=core-avx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84786
--- Comment #10 from Matthias Kretz ---
This is all I have right now:
TID 0 SDE-ERROR: Executed instruction not valid for specified chip (KNL):
0x70d281: vpsrlw xmm0, xmm0, xmm16
Image:
/home/travis/build/VcDevel/Vc/build-Experimental/c2dd920conc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84786
--- Comment #11 from Matthias Kretz ---
Created attachment 43762
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43762&action=edit
test case that produces incorrect vpsrlw
Compiled with `g++-7 -std=c++17 -O0 -fabi-version=0 -fabi-compat-ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84654
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85079
Bug ID: 85079
Summary: Segfault While Compiling DXX-Rebirth Project
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84878
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84786
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For 7.x I think we need:
--- gcc/config/i386/sse.md.jj 2018-03-05 17:04:45.820743323 +0100
+++ gcc/config/i386/sse.md 2018-03-26 17:29:00.967880855 +0200
@@ -10687,7 +10687,7 @@
[(set (match_operan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84737
--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor ---
I guess you'll need to check whether it is PR 55334 (i.e. not preserving
restrict accross ipa-cp and/or inlining) coming back somehow...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85071
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85071
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Both valgrind and AddressSanitizer would have found this bug, you should use
them.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85078
--- Comment #1 from Franz Sirl ---
The ICE was introduced between r257623 and r257685.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28457
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85080
Bug ID: 85080
Summary: [8 regression]
gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-pr37194.c fails
starting with r248678
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85080
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64*-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85062
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 26 16:30:41 2018
New Revision: 258859
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258859&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85062 - ICE with alignas in wrong place.
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85081
Bug ID: 85081
Summary: [7(8 Regression] Sanitizer error with references in
vectorized/parallel for-loop
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #34 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ok, I can now reproduce, but only with -flto, not without that.
Without -flto, before pre I see:
[local count: 85892]:
# logchl_591 = PHI
<-3.0097868371792719699442386627197265625e+0(33), lo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|dave.pagan a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #67 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On March 26, 2018 2:46:08 PM GMT+02:00, "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
>
>--- Comment #66 from Jakub Jelinek ---
>(In reply to Jakub Jeline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #35 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43763
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43763&action=edit
pr82004_dumps.tar.xz
Dumps. For lto I've just added the init_sw_absorption function parts of the
dump, the du
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39808
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|dave.pagan a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #68 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #67)
> On March 26, 2018 2:46:08 PM GMT+02:00, "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org"
> wrote:
> >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
> >
> >--- Comment #66 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83638
--- Comment #2 from mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz ---
>From performance point of view it doesn't matter if the lock is taken inside
the kernel or inside the gcc library.
If the userspace wants to optimize different code paths for lockle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85082
Bug ID: 85082
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE with -Ofast in
vn_reference_insert_pieces, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:2624
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85083
Bug ID: 85083
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in
gfc_convert_to_structure_constructor, at
fortran/primary.c:2915
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85084
Bug ID: 85084
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE: out of memory allocating
18446744073709551600 bytes ...
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83983
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu, |hppa-unknown-linux-gnu,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85073
--- Comment #1 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Mar 26 19:26:19 2018
New Revision: 258864
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258864&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85073
* config/i386/i386.md (*bmi_blsr__
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85073
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84878
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner ---
So we segv in ddg.c:add_cross_iteration_register_deps() at this code:
/* Create inter-loop true dependences and anti dependences. */
for (r_use = DF_REF_CHAIN (last_def); r_use != NULL; r_use = r_use->n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85084
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
