https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71638
--- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Mar 21 07:09:22 2018
New Revision: 258703
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258703&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71638, ICE with NSDMI and reference.
* constexp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359
--- Comment #45 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Proposed patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-03/msg00885.html
Richi has made some suggestions and will take it from here.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85013
Bug ID: 85013
Summary: :1:41: internal compiler error: in
wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1567 0x4097e2b
wide_int_to_tree_1
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85014
Bug ID: 85014
Summary: internal compiler error: in lookup_base, at
cp/search.c:185
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71638
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE on |[6/7 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85015
Bug ID: 85015
Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class
'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in
build_int_cst, at tree.c:1360
Product: gcc
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85016
Bug ID: 85016
Summary: internal compiler error: side-effects element in
no-side-effects CONSTRUCTOR
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84615
--- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Preliminary tests show that all the failures reported in comment 0 are
> fixed by the patch except:
>
> % gfc -m32 -fdefault-integer-8
> /opt/gcc/p_work/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_1.f90
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85016
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85015
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83765
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85014
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85014
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85013
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85013
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.4
Summary|:1:41: internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85017
Bug ID: 85017
Summary: Missed constant propagation to index of array
reference
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84972
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
That seems better so please go ahead with your patch then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85010
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84990
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84988
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 21 08:26:05 2018
New Revision: 258704
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258704&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix compile-time hog in MPX boundary checking (PR target/84988).
2018-03-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84963
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 21 08:26:49 2018
New Revision: 258705
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258705&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove superfluous return statement (PR ipa/84963).
2018-03-21 Martin Li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84988
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84963
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84995
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84996
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84615
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84997
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84998
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84999
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85000
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85006
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85002
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
The issue is that 'dest' is NULL so we build NULL.a which of course can't work.
8845 /* We need source and destination components. */
8846 comp = fold_build3_loc (input_location,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85006
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85011
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|diagnostic |rejects-valid
--- Comment #1 from Richa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85008
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85013
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85012
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82491
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> > Thanks Richard!
> >
> > Now I still see the other issue in dwarf2out:
> >
> > Breakpoint 1, based_loc_descr (reg=0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85007
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84900
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85017
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85015
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84972
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|paolo.carlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #54 from Christophe Lyon ---
Author: clyon
Date: Wed Mar 21 09:26:03 2018
New Revision: 258707
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258707&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/82518: Fix testcase.
2018-03-21 Christophe Lyon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45996
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.3.5
Target Milestone|8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84846
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
GCOV's intermediate format looks promising. Can it be used to generate zero
coverage data for .gcno files where no .gcda file is present? This is relevant
for example for projects which consist of multiple exe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #55 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Wed Mar 21 09:36:24 2018
New Revision: 258708
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258708&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Commit missing Changelogs for PR target/82518 fix.
Modif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85007
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84956
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 43722
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43722&action=edit
Tentative patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84989
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 21 10:13:29 2018
New Revision: 258709
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258709&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/84989
* simplify-rtx.c (simplify_unary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85018
Bug ID: 85018
Summary: [8 Regression] Many sanitizer tests ICE since r258681
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48379
Stanisław Halik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sthalik at misaki dot pl
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70410
--- Comment #2 from Sergey Podobry ---
It seems to fixed since gcc6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84969
--- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Wed Mar 21 10:42:34 2018
New Revision: 258710
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258710&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/84969
* tree-loop-distribut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85018
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85018
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43723
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43723&action=edit
gcc8-pr85018.patch
Oops, sorry, missed that asan.c also uses the DECL_INITIAL (decl) = decl; hack.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84836
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84836
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Mar 21 10:59:28 2018
New Revision: 258711
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258711&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/84836] ICE with local scopes
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84998
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84960
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Slightly better one without the weird __builtin_prefetch.
/* PR tree-optimization/84960 */
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -fwrapv" } */
void
foo (int a, float b, void *c)
{
lab:
if ((b - (a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84997
--- Comment #3 from Antony Polukhin ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
<...>
> If it produces an unspecified value it doesn't raise undefined behavior,
> right?
> So replacing it with lhs += 2; is incorrect as if that overflows that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84960
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85011
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
EDG and MSVC reject it too. They all accept it if the definition says
decltype(x), matching the declaration.
I think the bug is in GCC's diagnostic printing, which doesn't show the
signature as it was writ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83126
--- Comment #11 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Wed Mar 21 12:25:03 2018
New Revision: 258713
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258713&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[parloops] Handle canonicalize_loop_ivs failure
2018-03-21 Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84999
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
-m32 doesn't support __int128, nor int __attribute__((mode(TI))), and the
__float128 vector comparison would be just a loophole to get at that support.
C++ FE diagnoses this already:
pr84999.c:5:5: error: cou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82491
--- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> > Dunno, either perform the calculation in poly_uint64 instead and then cast
> > to poly_int64, or don
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85019
Bug ID: 85019
Summary: configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84892
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84892
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Mar 21 13:09:09 2018
New Revision: 258716
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258716&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
C++: show private field accessor hints for const accesses (PR c++/84892
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85019
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84999
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84955
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cesar at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85020
Bug ID: 85020
Summary: [8 Regression] gcc fails to bootstrap with
profiledbootstrap and
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84973
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85008
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85008
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84992
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0)
>
> But the first question here is: is this a valid openacc program?
>
> Given that function static variables are not supported in functions to which
> a routine di
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83660
Will Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79078
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-01-13 00:00:00 |2018-3-21
--- Comment #13 from Jonatha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83789
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.4
--- Comment #22 from Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85021
Bug ID: 85021
Summary: "Missing #include" hints for unrecognized names that
would implicitly be in "std"
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85021
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84851
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84269
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Another one, affecting C++ only:
void f() {
printf("test");
}
: In function 'void f()':
:2:5: error: 'printf' was not declared in this scope
printf("test");
^~
:2:5: note: suggested altern
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85021
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84850
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Mar 21 15:14:02 2018
New Revision: 258719
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258719&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84850 - -Wclass-memaccess on a memcpy in a copy assignment operator
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84850
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85022
Bug ID: 85022
Summary: internal compiler error: in write_dependence_p, at
alias.c:3003
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85015
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85014
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85023
Bug ID: 85023
Summary: [8 regression] many ICE failures with asan test cases
starting with r258664
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61754
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85023
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85018
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83660
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
I think the issue is that gimplify_cleanup_point_expr when walking the
body_sequence to look for WCE stmts doesn't traverse GIMPLE_BIND sub-stmts.
Or it is not supposed to do that and the GENERIC is at faul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85022
Vegard Nossum changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |inline-asm
--- Comment #1 from Vegard No
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85020
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-debug
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84782
Raphael Kubo da Costa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||raphael.kubo.da.costa@intel
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo