https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48379
Stanisław Halik <sthalik at misaki dot pl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sthalik at misaki dot pl
--- Comment #3 from Stanisław Halik <sthalik at misaki dot pl> ---
Richard,
The C or C++ programmer typically wants to notice misuses such as "fabs" rather
than `fabsf'. These are the expensive call sites, and give incorrect opinions
of numeric algorithm stability. This is particularly painful for the C
programmer where there are no overloaded variants.
Functions such as printf(3) are not in the hot path. There's no way to silence
the warning at the callee's site, with a `_Pragma' or otherwise without a long
"#pragma GCC diagnostic ignore" each time.
