https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> As I said earlier, the patch is IMHO wrong and instead ARM/AArch64 should
> implement efficient mempcpy in the library.
> If not, we should have a target hook whet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83796
Michael Johnson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.4.0 |7.2.0
--- Comment #1 from Michael John
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83054
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Jan 12 08:59:52 2018
New Revision: 256566
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256566&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Initialize type_warnings::dyn_count with a default value (PR ipa/83054).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83054
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83812
Bug ID: 83812
Summary: nvptx-run: error getting kernel result: operation not
supported on global/shared address space
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83765
--- Comment #6 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #4)
> We have been crossing fingers about that for some time. ;-) CCing the
> expert.
Calling me “expert” is a bit far fetched: I never worked with LTO, and I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
So r224161 (hey Aldy!) caused this bogus DW_AT_abstract_origin and
Index: gcc/dwarf2out.c
===
--- gcc/dwarf2out.c (revision 255167)
+++ g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83800
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #34 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Jan 12 09:52:53 2018
New Revision: 256568
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256568&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Link with correct values-*.o files on Solaris (PR target/40411)
gcc/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67412
--- Comment #11 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Jan 12 09:52:53 2018
New Revision: 256568
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256568&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Link with correct values-*.o files on Solaris (PR target/40411)
gcc/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
--- Comment #19 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Jan 12 09:52:53 2018
New Revision: 256568
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256568&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Link with correct values-*.o files on Solaris (PR target/40411)
gcc/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|https://gcc.gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
Bug 64054 depends on bug 40411, which changed state.
Bug 40411 Summary: -std=c99 does not enable c99 mode in Solaris C library
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67412
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83796
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
ro_bits1): On WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS machines, do
not extend the result to a larger mode for rotate operations.
(num_sign_bit_copies1): Likewise.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20180112-1.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/rtlanal.c
t
ro_bits1): On WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS machines, do
not extend the result to a larger mode for rotate operations.
(num_sign_bit_copies1): Likewise.
Added:
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20180112-1.c
- copied unchanged from r256572,
trunk/gcc/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83565
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #37 from Bruno Haible ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #35)
> Fixed for GCC 8.1.
Please consider comment 17:
The behaviour of a shared library also depends on whether the executable
is linked with or without values-xpg6.o. T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83802
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628
Alexey Salmin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexey.salmin at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81155
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43114
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43114&action=edit
gcc8-pr81155.patch
Untested workaround till GDB is fixed, disable partitioning of main in lto.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81155
--- Comment #10 from Jan Kratochvil ---
It should affect all functions, not just main.
But then GDB already needlessly expands so many CUs that usually when some
function is needed its CU is already expanded. So maybe it is seen just
accidental
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81155
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Well, we certainly don't want to disable partitioning for all functions if in
LTO, that would be extremely costly.
Most of real-world programs don't do all the work in main, so disabling that
may be acceptab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> I think the testcases just make invalid assumptions.
Huh? Which assumptions specifically?
1) There are objects of static storage duration in some non-generi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83813
Bug ID: 83813
Summary: [GCOV] unsigned char in a union lead to incorrect
coverage in gcov
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83813
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jan 12 11:29:30 2018
New Revision: 256575
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256575&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/83368
* config/sparc/sparc.h (PIC_OFFSET_TA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83814
Bug ID: 83814
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimiza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83814
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80846
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 12 11:43:13 2018
New Revision: 256576
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256576&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-12 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/80846
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80846
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 80846, which changed state.
Bug 80846 Summary: auto-vectorized AVX2 horizontal sum should narrow to 128b
right away, to be more efficient for Ryzen and Intel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80846
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83814
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59298
--- Comment #8 from Adam Hirst ---
After another year, the issue still seems present. ICE when compiling the file
I attached, and Janus' reduced case.
The removal of the parenthesis still has the effect of avoiding the ICE.
Using built-in specs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83629
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Jan 12 12:10:16 2018
New Revision: 256577
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256577&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Tune new testcase (PR83629)
It has some problems running on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81819
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Fri Jan 12 12:10:56 2018
New Revision: 256578
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256578&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/81819
* config/rx/rx.c (rx_is_restricted_mem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81819
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Fri Jan 12 12:12:38 2018
New Revision: 256579
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256579&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2018-01-12 Oleg Endo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83796
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Actually I think it's r194284
commit 6fb305c7c88b07c429e8a39fbd514a417c5b6127
Author: jason
Date: Fri Dec 7 04:54:27 2012 +
PR c++/54325
* tree.c (build_aggr_init_expr): Don
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83794
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83356
--- Comment #11 from Arnd Bergmann ---
The second version of my workaround (build with 'gcc -Os' on gcc-7.1+) was
merged into mainline linux: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10143607/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43115
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43115&action=edit
gcc8-pr83801.patch
Untested patch, that if !is_init kind of restores the 7.x behavior of not using
DECL_INITIAL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 12 13:19:23 2018
New Revision: 256580
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256580&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-12 Richard Biener
PR debug/83157
* dwarf2o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83510
Franz Sirl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.4.0, 7.2.0
--- Comment #2 from Franz Sirl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83771
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Bug now needs new investigation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39508
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Roel Van de Paar from comment #5)
> Jason, thank you for your work on this here. Would you have a look at
> https://github.com/jdbirdwell/afl/issues/5 which looks to be the same issue,
> and it seems y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81616
--- Comment #44 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Jan 12 14:06:10 2018
New Revision: 256581
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256581&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Deferring FMA transformations in tight loops
2018-01-12 Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801
--- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> Created attachment 43115 [details]
> gcc8-pr83801.patch
>
> Untested patch, that if !is_init kind of restores the 7.x behavior of not
> using DECL_INITIAL if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83815
Bug ID: 83815
Summary: Enhance addressing for long double on PowerPC with
-meabi=ieeelongdouble
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83815
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-linux,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82694
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43116
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43116&action=edit
gcc8-pr82694.patch
So like this untested patch? Certainly don't have energy to look for all other
spots that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83816
Bug ID: 83816
Summary: [7 Regression] lto1: internal compiler error:
compressed stream: data error
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83814
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83817
Bug ID: 83817
Summary: [8 Regression]
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83817
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo ---
Created attachment 43117
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43117&action=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81819
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
Fixed on trunk and GCC 7.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81819
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83814
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83628
--- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Jan 12 16:47:45 2018
New Revision: 256589
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256589&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/83628
* config/alpha/alpha.md (*saddsi_1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83778
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83778
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43118
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43118&action=edit
gcc8-pr83778.patch
This restores the previous behavior for me. Note, the question is whether the
4 is really i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83510
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80481
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Jan 12 17:00:36 2018
New Revision: 256590
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256590&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-12 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/80481
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83814
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
The original source code for bug # 68619 and flag -O2,
seems to reproduce on x86_64.
I'll have a go at reducing that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83781
David Frantz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kb2gmx at verizon dot net
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83818
Bug ID: 83818
Summary: g++ class template parameter deduction discards const
qualifier
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83818
--- Comment #1 from Karolin varner ---
Created attachment 43119
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43119&action=edit
Test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83818
--- Comment #2 from Karolin varner ---
Comment on attachment 43119
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43119
Test case
>template
>struct tstruct {
> T x;
> tstruct(const T &x_) : x{x_} {}
>};
>
>int main() {
> const tstruct s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83800
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Functions bound to IEEE operations, such as sqrt and fma, should be
correctly rounding for all IEEE floating-point types (so not IBM long
double) supported by glibc. However, there's no ge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83712
sudi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83819
Bug ID: 83819
Summary: [meta-bug] missing strlen optimizations
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83737
--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Fri Jan 12 17:36:07 2018
New Revision: 256591
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256591&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Set use_gcc_stdint=wrap for nvptx
2018-01-12 Tom de Vries
PR t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83738
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83814
Sunil Pandey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skpgkp1 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83811
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83737
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83820
Bug ID: 83820
Summary: No diagnostic issued for noreturn attribute specifier
with an argument list
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83814
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
Thanks for the small testcase. Problem seems to occur between
revisions 256420 and 256556. No special flags required. -c will do it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83821
Bug ID: 83821
Summary: local aggregate initialization defeats strlen
optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83811
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle ---
The change has nothing to do with internl units. So it is related to the write
float refctoring we did.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83820
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83818
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81155
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 12 18:20:49 2018
New Revision: 256592
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256592&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/81155
* bb-reorder.c (pass_partition_blocks::gat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79242
--- Comment #8 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
Proposed patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01108.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83822
Bug ID: 83822
Summary: trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-string.c:970]: (style)
Redundant condition
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83186
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83821
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83186
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 12 19:40:11 2018
New Revision: 256594
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256594&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83186 - ICE with static_cast of list-initialized temporary.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39508
--- Comment #7 from Roel Van de Paar ---
"That guy" is me :)
Yes binutils 2.29.1 works fine after the minor 'ar' fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83525
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jan 12 20:01:47 2018
New Revision: 256595
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256595&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-12 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/83525
* gf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83525
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83823
Bug ID: 83823
Summary: [8 Regression] Character length issues with PACK()
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83622
--- Comment #7 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #6)
> That's what I have been trying to find out :-)
>
> It's jogging my memory but I cannot for the life of me rememeber what
> it was about.
>
> Pau
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53499
--- Comment #3 from Ed Catmur ---
I believe this also causes gcc to reject (as ambiguous) the example in
[temp.func.order]/3:
struct A { };
template struct B {
template int operator*(R&); // #1
};
template int operator*(T&, R&);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83821
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
