https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48150
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83419
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Thu Dec 21 18:14:06 2017
New Revision: 255947
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255947&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[SFN] propagate single-nondebug-stmt's side effects to enclosing list
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83419
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83537
Bug ID: 83537
Summary: missing integer overflow in offsetof not diagnosed
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83538
Bug ID: 83538
Summary: std::match_results C++14 conformance issue: reference
!= value_type&
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83536
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83527
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83467
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Dec 21 19:00:28 2017
New Revision: 255949
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255949&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/83467
* config/i386/i386.md (*ashl3_mask
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83406
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Dec 21 19:16:01 2017
New Revision: 255950
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255950&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/83406] deducing lambda type
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83406
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83160
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83521
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 21 19:26:34 2017
New Revision: 255952
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255952&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83521
* tree-ssa-phiopt.c (factor_out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83523
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 21 19:27:21 2017
New Revision: 255953
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255953&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83523
* tree-ssa-math-opts.c (is_wide
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83512
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 21 19:28:10 2017
New Revision: 255954
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255954&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/80747
PR rtl-optimization/83512
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80747
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 21 19:28:10 2017
New Revision: 255954
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255954&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/80747
PR rtl-optimization/83512
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83523
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE: |[6/7 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83521
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE: |[6/7 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80747
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] |[6/7 Regression]
|gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30552
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|dave.pagan a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46921
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83535
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83535
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 42950
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42950&action=edit
hacked up preprocessed file showing problem with only -O3 -g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57076
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Maybe the best thing would be reject this during configure.
>
Since I can't think of anything better, agreed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83467
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Dec 21 20:48:34 2017
New Revision: 255956
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255956&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/83467
* config/i386/i386.md (*ashl3_mask
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83467
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
This really looks like something tree-ssa-uninit.c ought to be handling too.
[ Just to be clear we should fix both tree-ssa-uninit.c the cfgcleanup. ]
We have a PHI with a default definition on the RHS:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83438
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
My bisections keep landing on:
commit bb173647d8221f86812f4e98942960b894e9e972 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad)
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Nov 23 15:56:28 2017 +
* ipa-fnsummary.c (record_modified_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83539
Bug ID: 83539
Summary: [8 regression] several test case failures starting
with r255947
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83536
--- Comment #2 from mateuszb at poczta dot onet.pl ---
Yes, I agree.
The 80-chars width limit was also significant in this case -- instead of
writing code you must fight with too long lines. I think that there is the time
to change this limit to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83540
Bug ID: 83540
Summary: [8 Regression] Invalid code with MATMUL,
-fno-realloc-lhs -ffrontend-optimize
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82027
--- Comment #12 from Martin Jambor ---
Thanks, I have submitted the patch to the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg01457.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83535
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Dec 21 22:02:45 2017
New Revision: 255958
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255958&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/83535
* gcc-interface/decl.c (gnat_to_gnu_entit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83535
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83541
Bug ID: 83541
Summary: Missed optimization with int overflow
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83527
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg01462.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83541
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
Yes, it is a known issue, (E)VRP is too conservative.
pushing new range for x_2(D): [2147483647, +INF] EQUIVALENCES: { x_2(D) } (1
elements)
Visiting stmt _4 = x_2(D) + 1;
Visiting statement:
_4 = x_2(D) + 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83541
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
int test(void)
{
int x = __INT_MAX__;
return x+1;
}
CCP also turns this into INT_MIN, again it could be bolder.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 21 23:09:14 2017
New Revision: 255960
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255960&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/83448
* gimple-ssa-sprintf.c (maybe_warn): Don't cal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83487
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 21 23:10:45 2017
New Revision: 255961
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255961&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/83487
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_function_a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83487
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8 Regression] ice in |[7 Regression] ice in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83542
Bug ID: 83542
Summary: template deduction failure when using pack in both
deduced and non-deduced contexts
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83542
--- Comment #1 from Barry Revzin ---
This slightly different example:
template
struct list { };
template
void foo(list, list, void(*)(T..., U))
{ }
void f(int, int) { }
int main()
{
foo(list{}, list{}, &f);
}
fails with a different
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543
Bug ID: 83543
Summary: strlen of a local array member not optimized on some
targets
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83462
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target|arm-none-ea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83462
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Dec 22 00:07:39 2017
New Revision: 255962
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255962&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/83462 - c-c++-common/Warray-bounds-3.c fails
gcc/testsuite/C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 from M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83419
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Dec 22 02:07:31 2017
New Revision: 255966
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255966&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[SFN] sync up debug-only stmt list's side effects with empty stmts too
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83527
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Dec 22 02:07:31 2017
New Revision: 255966
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255966&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[SFN] sync up debug-only stmt list's side effects with empty stmts too
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83527
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83544
Bug ID: 83544
Summary: Missed optimization opportunity for constant folding
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83458
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83458
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83546
Bug ID: 83546
Summary: -march=silvermont doesn't enable rdrnd by default
despite what docs say
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83547
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Priority|P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83547
Bug ID: 83547
Summary: [8 Regression] (statement-frontiers) error: void value
not ignored as it ought to be
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83544
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
In one case we optimize super early to
int t = 1 / (int) x <= 0 ? 1 / 0 : 1;
which prevents the VRP optimization from the other case. We almost recover in
isolate-paths, except that Jeff insisted on using __b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83458
--- Comment #3 from Daan van Vugt ---
Ahh, okay, thanks!
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 5:58 AM, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83458
>
> Jerry DeLisle changed:
>
>
101 - 163 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
