https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83419
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83418
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79650
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 14 08:16:51 2017
New Revision: 255623
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255623&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79650
* pt.c (convert_nontype_argument): Diagnose
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83415
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83418
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83414
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83412
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83413
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
/usr/bin/ld: ../../../../../scripts/src/libutils.a(strformat.o): relocation
R_ARM_MOVW_ABS_NC against `_ZNKSt5ctypeIcE8do_widenEc' can not be used when
making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
^^^
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83411
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83420
Bug ID: 83420
Summary: S/390 bootstrap failure starting with r255569
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83420
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79650
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE on |[6/7 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83415
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83419
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83326
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
We no longer unroll the inner loops in cunrolli because cunrolli will leave us
with exit checks.
We fail to compute the number of iterations of the inner loop(s) (pre loop
header copying):
[local count: 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83326
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 42879
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42879&action=edit
patch in testing
Patch I am testing. Performance evaluation appreciated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83414
Pablo M. S. Farias changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83419
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The difference is in shortcut_cond_expr, which does:
3640 bool then_se = then_ && TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (then_);
3641 bool else_se = else_ && TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (else_);
Now, else_ in one case is:
0;
whi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83421
Bug ID: 83421
Summary: GCC give better error when 32bit x86 libs not found
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81228
--- Comment #7 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sudi
Date: Thu Dec 14 10:35:38 2017
New Revision: 255625
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255625&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH PR81228][AARCH64]Fix ICE by adding LTGT in vec_cmp
This pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82006
--- Comment #13 from Rainer Emrich ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #12)
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82006
> >
> > --- Comment #11 from Rainer Emrich
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83398
--- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka ---
This stopped failing between r255606 (ICEs) and r255624 (OK).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83422
Bug ID: 83422
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: in final_scan_insn, at
final.c:2429 after "variable tracking size limit
exceeded with -fvar-tracking-assignments, retrying
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80837
--- Comment #6 from Peter Cordes ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> But have just tried gcc 7.1.0 release and can't reproduce even there.
Matt says the Compiler Explorer backend uses upstream release tarballs like
`URL=ftp://ftp.g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83419
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83198
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 14 11:01:17 2017
New Revision: 255626
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255626&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83198
* gimple-ssa-sprintf.c (format_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396
--- Comment #59 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 14 11:02:37 2017
New Revision: 255627
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255627&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/83396
* var-tracking.c (vt_initialize): Igno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83198
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Summary|[7/8 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83414
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
A class that uses new/delete but doesn't have a proper copy constructor defined
is a massive red flag, and that should have been obvious.
Instead of blaming GCC you could have found this using valgrind:
=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83421
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
GCC can't know why that header is missing, and it can't recommend
Ubuntu-specific packages.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83421
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
You could ask the Ubuntu maintainers to include such a patch for their packages
though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83423
Bug ID: 83423
Summary: default_static_chain is sorry for non-nested functions
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83418
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 14 11:12:52 2017
New Revision: 255628
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255628&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-12-14 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/83418
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83415
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83418
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83415
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 14 11:13:34 2017
New Revision: 255629
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255629&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-12-14 Richard Biener
PR c/83415
c/
* c
6_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-255624-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-nographite-amd64
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20171214 (experimental) (GCC)
Tested revisions:
r255624 - FAIL
r255606 - FAIL
r23 - FAIL
r255386 - OK
f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396
--- Comment #60 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Joseph, thanks for the feedback. I've fixed the SH (and ARC) build error in my
tree.
Andreas, thanks for the ia64 testcases, I'm looking into them. From your email
address, is it correct to assume that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68519
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83422
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83422
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, at minimum I think we need something like:
--- gcc/var-tracking.c.jj 2017-12-14 12:02:07.0 +0100
+++ gcc/var-tracking.c 2017-12-14 12:31:22.802421765 +0100
@@ -10328,6 +10328,10 @@ delete_v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83424
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83422
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Right now, I can't see a reason to drop markers just because VTA is disabled.
Although they do lose some value, they're probably still useful on their own.
So I suggest dropping both lines that clear cfun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59568
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Dec 14 11:53:02 2017
New Revision: 255633
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255633&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/59568 don't use putback or update value when extraction fail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83422
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ok, in that case please take this over. Though, if you don't mind to include
the formatting fix from the above patch, I'd appreciate it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59568
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Dec 14 12:01:40 2017
New Revision: 255634
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255634&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/59568 don't use putback or update value when extraction fai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83237
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59568
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |6.5
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83403
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||53947
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83414
--- Comment #4 from Pablo M. S. Farias ---
Thank you for the instructions; I'll follow them from now on.
Sorry for the inconveniences.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83421
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81812
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81841
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81860
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83419
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #42881|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81863
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81889
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81914
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Priority|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81922
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81918
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81951
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82060
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83425
Bug ID: 83425
Summary: No warning about assignment int to unsigned
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82152
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82167
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82231
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82253
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82286
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82352
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82461
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82364
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.4.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82371
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82468
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82664
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82666
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82722
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82739
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82764
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82801
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83398
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82872
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82880
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82981
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83084
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83116
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83162
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83198
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83426
Bug ID: 83426
Summary: template argument involves template parameters with
implicit integral conversion
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83201
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Do we have an indication that it worked with any 6.x or 7.x release?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83204
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82880
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83227
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81635
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81228
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83427
Bug ID: 83427
Summary: [7/8 Regression] [C++17] weak result types and
adaptable functions don't support noexcept functions
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83427
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83428
Bug ID: 83428
Summary: Static initialization and struct with constexpr ctor
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83388
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
I believe we do not stream any references to references and once we start to do
we will need to invent machinery to keep them intact like we have for edges and
symbols. So I would go for removal of the refernec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83388
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #7)
> I believe we do not stream any references to references and once we start to
> do we will need to invent machinery to keep them intact like we have for
> edges and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83326
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo