[Bug middle-end/83004] [8 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr81136.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83004 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/83007] [8 Regression] -Wstringop-overflow false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83007 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug c/82963] -Waddress too trigger happy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82963 --- Comment #3 from Michal Hocko --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #2) [...] > > Moreover the warning itself is quite inconsistent. E.g. the following warns > > about the explicit &m but not for n. So I believe this is more of a >

[Bug fortran/83012] [8 Regression] Simply contiguous pointer function not recognized as contiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83012 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/83008] [performance] Is it better to avoid extra instructions in data passing between loops?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target|

[Bug sanitizer/83014] New: ICE in pretty-print with -fsanitize=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83014 Bug ID: 83014 Summary: ICE in pretty-print with -fsanitize=bounds Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: saniti

[Bug bootstrap/83015] New: [8 regression] bootstrap comparison failure on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83015 Bug ID: 83015 Summary: [8 regression] bootstrap comparison failure on ia64 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug driver/83016] New: gnat1: warning: command line option ‘-nostdinc++’ is valid for C++/ObjC++ but not for Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83016 Bug ID: 83016 Summary: gnat1: warning: command line option ‘-nostdinc++’ is valid for C++/ObjC++ but not for Ada Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug sanitizer/83014] ICE in pretty-print with -fsanitize=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83014 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/83014] ICE in pretty-print with -fsanitize=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83014 --- Comment #2 from ghjghj530-bubu at yahoo dot de --- Thanks for your quick response: Compiling with --verbose: Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=i686-elf-gcc.exe Target: i686-elf Configured with: ../gcc-6.3.0/configure --prefix=/opt/V6.3.0 --t

[Bug sanitizer/83014] ICE in pretty-print with -fsanitize=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83014 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Ok, so it's i686 target. What operation system is that?

[Bug sanitizer/83014] ICE in pretty-print with -fsanitize=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83014 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- And can you please run it in debugger in order to display back-trace?

[Bug driver/83016] gnat1: warning: command line option ‘-nostdinc++’ is valid for C++/ObjC++ but not for Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83016 --- Comment #1 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat --- I can’t reproduce with “--enable-languages=c,c++,ada --disable-multilib --disable-libsanitizer” on trunk r254797. Do you use specific options?

[Bug sanitizer/83014] ICE in pretty-print with -fsanitize=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83014 --- Comment #5 from ghjghj530-bubu at yahoo dot de --- The OS is Windows 7, 64-bit. Unfortunately i don't use the debug-version of GCC and can therefore not provide a detailed backtrace right now. Maybe next week. Note that my original message c

[Bug driver/83016] gnat1: warning: command line option ‘-nostdinc++’ is valid for C++/ObjC++ but not for Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83016 --- Comment #2 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer --- ../../src/gcc-8.0.mine/configure \ -v \ --enable-languages=c,fortra

[Bug bootstrap/83015] [8 regression] bootstrap comparison failure on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83015 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70383] Bogus error when attempting to capture a reference to function by copy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70383 --- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Nov 16 10:36:51 2017 New Revision: 254808 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254808&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-11-16 Paolo Carlini PR c++/70383 * g++

[Bug c++/70383] Bogus error when attempting to capture a reference to function by copy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70383 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/83017] New: DO CONCURRENT not parallelizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017 Bug ID: 83017 Summary: DO CONCURRENT not parallelizing Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug bootstrap/83015] [8 regression] bootstrap comparison failure on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83015 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug fortran/83017] DO CONCURRENT not parallelizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/83017] DO CONCURRENT not parallelizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/71026] Missing division optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71026 --- Comment #9 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Thu Nov 16 11:54:49 2017 New Revision: 254816 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254816&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Canonicalize constant multiplies in division This patch implements some of the op

[Bug c++/81060] [8 Regression] ICE with un-expanded parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81060 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81060] [8 Regression] ICE with un-expanded parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81060 --- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Thu Nov 16 12:11:36 2017 New Revision: 254817 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254817&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR c++/81060] ICE with invalid initialzer via lambda https://gcc.gnu.o

[Bug c++/79331] ICE on valid C++14 code (with initialized lambda capture) on x86_64-linux-gnu: in canonicalize_component_ref, at gimplify.c:2451

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79331 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/83017] DO CONCURRENT not parallelizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017 --- Comment #3 from Christian Felter --- Ultimately, I wanted to compute k like this k = permutation( j ) where permutation is a 1D array of integers (from 1 to 4, e.g. [ 1, 4, 2, 1, 3, ... etc] ). This would allow an easy way of parallelizing

[Bug fortran/83017] DO CONCURRENT not parallelizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On November 16, 2017 1:22:37 PM GMT+01:00, cfztol at hotmail dot com wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017 > >--- Comment #3 from Christian Felter --- >Ultimately, I wanted t

[Bug sanitizer/83014] ICE in pretty-print with -fsanitize=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83014 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Sorry, but I can't reproduce on linux with cross compiler for mingw32.

[Bug fortran/83017] DO CONCURRENT not parallelizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017 --- Comment #5 from Christian Felter --- Okay, sounds like there is hope. By the way, the problem also exists without a function call. Declaring real, dimension(nsplit) :: tmp and replacing the loop with do concurrent (i = 1:nsplit)

[Bug c++/83003] Using the detection idiom and void_t causes an error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83003 ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com

[Bug c++/83000] Constraints for union-templates do not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83000 ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com

[Bug fortran/83017] DO CONCURRENT not parallelizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On November 16, 2017 2:22:50 PM GMT+01:00, cfztol at hotmail dot com wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017 > >--- Comment #5 from Christian Felter --- >Okay, sounds like ther

[Bug fortran/83017] DO CONCURRENT not parallelizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- If I "fix" GCC to consider the loop you annotate parallel: do concurrent (i = 1:nsplit) pi(i) = sum(compute( low(i), high(i) )) end do then we arrive at computing 4 iterations of that loop

[Bug fortran/83017] DO CONCURRENT not parallelizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 42620 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42620&action=edit patch Otherwise untested patch. Note ivdep is mapped to safelen which isn't useful for parallelization given

[Bug fortran/83017] DO CONCURRENT not parallelizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/83018] New: To support creation of header-only C++ libraries with SIMD optimization and dynamic dispatch, allow all intrinsics regardless of target architecture

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83018 Bug ID: 83018 Summary: To support creation of header-only C++ libraries with SIMD optimization and dynamic dispatch, allow all intrinsics regardless of target architecture P

[Bug middle-end/83019] New: Compiler dumps predictions with -nan%

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83019 Bug ID: 83019 Summary: Compiler dumps predictions with -nan% Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug middle-end/83019] Compiler dumps predictions with -nan%

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83019 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug ada/81878] --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=ada fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878 --- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou --- This also breaks 'make all-gnattools' in a bootstrap build: g++ -std=gnu++98 -static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc -I- -I../rts -I. -I/home/eric/svn/gcc/gcc/ada -static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc -DIN_GCC -g -O2

[Bug driver/83016] gnat1: warning: command line option ‘-nostdinc++’ is valid for C++/ObjC++ but not for Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83016 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/82737] [ICE] Compiler segfault on compilation of a certain file (full cause unknown) (file too large for upload, link provided)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82737 --- Comment #23 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Thu Nov 16 14:54:54 2017 New Revision: 254823 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254823&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PATCH] New lang hook https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg01

[Bug c++/82836] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82836 --- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Thu Nov 16 14:54:54 2017 New Revision: 254823 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254823&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PATCH] New lang hook https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg013

[Bug c++/82836] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82836 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82737] [ICE] Compiler segfault on compilation of a certain file (full cause unknown) (file too large for upload, link provided)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82737 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/81878] --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=ada fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878 --- Comment #17 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #16) > This also breaks 'make all-gnattools' in a bootstrap build: > > g++ -std=gnu++98 -static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc -I- -I../rts -I. > -I/home/eric/svn/gcc/gcc/

[Bug middle-end/83019] [8 Regression] Compiler dumps predictions with -nan%

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83019 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0 Summary|Compiler dumps p

[Bug c++/83018] To support creation of header-only C++ libraries with SIMD optimization and dynamic dispatch, allow all x86 intrinsics regardless of target instruction set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83018 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* Status|

[Bug rtl-optimization/80818] LRA clobbers live hard reg clobbered during rematerialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80818 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Krebbel

[Bug ada/81878] --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=ada fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878 --- Comment #18 from Eric Botcazou --- > all-gnattools: configure-gnattools > @: $(MAKE); $(unstage) > @r=`${PWD_COMMAND}`; export r; \ > s=`cd $(srcdir); ${PWD_COMMAND}`; export s; \ > $(HOST_EXPORTS) \ >

[Bug c++/83020] New: ('17) Class template constructor call skipped with no error when substitution fails in default argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83020 Bug ID: 83020 Summary: ('17) Class template constructor call skipped with no error when substitution fails in default argument Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug fortran/69455] [6/7/8 Regression] [F08] Assembler error(s) when using intrinsic modules in two BLOCK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69455 Ev Drikos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drikosev at gmail dot com --- Comment #12 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/82588] missing -Warray-bounds on a excessively large index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82588 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Nov 16 16:12:36 2017 New Revision: 254830 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254830&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/82588 - missing -Warray-bounds on a excessively large

[Bug tree-optimization/82583] missing -Warray-bounds on out-of-bounds inner indices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82583 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Nov 16 16:12:36 2017 New Revision: 254830 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254830&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/82588 - missing -Warray-bounds on a excessively large

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 82583, which changed state. Bug 82583 Summary: missing -Warray-bounds on out-of-bounds inner indices https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82583 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/82583] missing -Warray-bounds on out-of-bounds inner indices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82583 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/82588] missing -Warray-bounds on a excessively large index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82588 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED See Also|

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 82588, which changed state. Bug 82588 Summary: missing -Warray-bounds on a excessively large index https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82588 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/68325] missing -Warray-bounds on a negative subscript into a flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68325 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/82588] missing -Warray-bounds on a excessively large index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82588 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug debug/83010] [AARCH64] DW_AT_location is not emitted for thread local variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83010 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/59124] [6 Regression] Wrong warnings "array subscript is above array bounds"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59124 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 59124, which changed state. Bug 59124 Summary: [6 Regression] Wrong warnings "array subscript is above array bounds" https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59124 What|Removed |Add

[Bug fortran/83017] DO CONCURRENT not parallelizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Created attachment 42621 [details] > updated patch AFAICT the patch does not fix the problem: without the patch PI 2.98876095 PI 3.14159274 4.742u 0.015s 0:04.77 99.5% 0+0k 0+0i

[Bug middle-end/63477] [6/7/8 Regression] Bogus warning with -O3 -Warray-bounds: array subscript is above array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63477 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Nov 16 16:48:36 2017 New Revision: 254833 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254833&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/63477 - Bogus warning with -O3 -Warray-bounds: array subscri

[Bug middle-end/63477] [6/7/8 Regression] Bogus warning with -O3 -Warray-bounds: array subscript is above array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63477 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 63477, which changed state. Bug 63477 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] Bogus warning with -O3 -Warray-bounds: array subscript is above array bounds https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63477 What|Remove

[Bug fortran/83017] DO CONCURRENT not parallelizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017 --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On November 16, 2017 5:42:02 PM GMT+01:00, "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017 > >--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres >--- >> Created att

[Bug debug/83010] [AARCH64] DW_AT_location is not emitted for thread local variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83010 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- >From quick look, it seems gas/ld just doesn't have corresponding support, so that would need to be written first. There is R_AARCH64_TLS_DTPREL64 relocation, wonder if that might do the job if gas has some

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 63441, which changed state. Bug 63441 Summary: incorrect "array subscript is below/above array bounds" diagnostic https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63441 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/63441] incorrect "array subscript is below/above array bounds" diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63441 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug fortran/83012] [8 Regression] Simply contiguous pointer function not recognized as contiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83012 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/82977] [8 Regression] AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free in strlen_optimize_stmt .././../gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c:2971

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82977 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/82976] [8 Regression] Error: non-trivial conversion at assignment since r254526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82976 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug fortran/82904] [7/8 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:261

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82904 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug c++/82799] [8 Regression] -Wunused-but-set-variable false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82799 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/83010] [AARCH64] DW_AT_location is not emitted for thread local variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83010 --- Comment #3 from Yao Qi --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > From quick look, it seems gas/ld just doesn't have corresponding support, so > that would need to be written first. There is R_AARCH64_TLS_DTPREL64 > relocation, wonder

[Bug c++/82781] [6/7/8 Regression] Vector extension operators return wrong result in constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82781 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/83021] New: [7 Regression] gfortran segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83021 Bug ID: 83021 Summary: [7 Regression] gfortran segfault Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug web/78315] "Changes" don't explain what "LRA" is

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78315 --- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager --- The "Changes" page for gcc-7 at least says now that LRA is "(a new local register allocator)"; is that enough?

[Bug middle-end/83022] New: malloc & memset -> calloc is not always an optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83022 Bug ID: 83022 Summary: malloc & memset -> calloc is not always an optimization Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug c++/82781] [6/7/8 Regression] Vector extension operators return wrong result in constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82781 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 42624 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42624&action=edit gcc8-pr82781.patch Untested fix.

[Bug fortran/83017] DO CONCURRENT not parallelizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Please use -fopt-info-loop to verify the loop is parallelized. You have > to use -floop-parallelize-all as well due to the cost model issue. If I use the commented loop I get with/without the patc

[Bug fortran/83021] [7 Regression] gfortran segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83021 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/83023] New: branch probabilities pessimize malloc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83023 Bug ID: 83023 Summary: branch probabilities pessimize malloc Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug target/62011] False Data Dependency in popcnt instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62011 Andrew Senkevich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew.n.senkevich at gmail dot co

[Bug driver/83016] gnat1: warning: command line option ‘-nostdinc++’ is valid for C++/ObjC++ but not for Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83016 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor

[Bug c++/79092] template: type ignored if value already instantiated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79092 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Nov 16 20:13:48 2017 New Revision: 254843 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254843&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/79092 - non-type args of different types are different

[Bug tree-optimization/82946] member pointer defeats strlen optimization involving a string literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82946 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5) > This means you can very well replace memcpy with strcpy if you know > there's a '\0' in and only in the right place. Sure, except when dealing with a string l

[Bug bootstrap/82856] --enable-maintainter-mode broken by incompatiblity of gcc's required automake and modern Perl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82856 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Thu Nov 16 20:24:00 2017 New Revision: 254845 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254845&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-11-16 Thomas Koenig PR bootstrap/82856 * doc/in

[Bug target/79845] rs6000: make code in rs6000.c more i18n-friendly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79845 --- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Thu Nov 16 20:29:52 2017 New Revision: 254846 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254846&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-11-16 Michael Meissner Back port from trunk

[Bug target/82748] ICE with __builtin_fabsq and __float128 in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:612

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82748 --- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Thu Nov 16 20:29:52 2017 New Revision: 254846 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254846&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-11-16 Michael Meissner Back port from trunk

[Bug ipa/60243] IPA is slow on large cgraph tree

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60243 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug lto/48724] Lto build of mozilla dies at lto-wrapper: error trying to exec 'make -j1': execvp: No such file or directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48724 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 Bug 45375 depends on bug 48724, which changed state. Bug 48724 Summary: Lto build of mozilla dies at lto-wrapper: error trying to exec 'make -j1': execvp: No such file or directory https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48724 Wh

[Bug other/53742] bad assembler output when compiling with LTO and PGO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53742 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/83022] malloc & memset -> calloc is not always an optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83022 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- I am pretty sure this was discussed when the patch was reviewed. IIRC the original patch was specifically pattern-matching if(p!=0) (with p the result of malloc) as the only acceptable condition between malloc

[Bug fortran/25829] [F03] Asynchronous IO support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829 --- Comment #32 from Janne Blomqvist --- Interestingly, Linux 4.14 contains a way to avoid a context switch to a threadpool in case the data is already in the page cache: https://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_4.14#head-8c8861fbded3e87631ab06bcd511f5f0d

[Bug c++/83024] New: ICE in build_address, at cp/typeck.c:5623

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83024 Bug ID: 83024 Summary: ICE in build_address, at cp/typeck.c:5623 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/83024] ICE in build_address, at cp/typeck.c:5623

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83024 --- Comment #1 from Guille --- I have tested the unsimplified version of this code, and it ICEs on every version *after* gcc-8-20170827.

  1   2   >