https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82963
--- Comment #3 from Michal Hocko <mhocko at kernel dot org> --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #2) [...] > > Moreover the warning itself is quite inconsistent. E.g. the following warns > > about the explicit &m but not for n. So I believe this is more of a > > suboptimal warning implementation than real intention. > > This is because the warning is given in the front-end, which does not know > the value of n. Not that it matters much, this is really trying to catch a > typo, not the actual value of a pointer. Would it be possible to skip the warning for macros at least?
