https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82784
--- Comment #13 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Nov 7 08:11:43 2017
New Revision: 254489
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254489&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[libgcc] Remove semicolon after do {} while (0) in FP_HANDLE_EXCEPTIONS
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82784
--- Comment #14 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Nov 7 08:11:54 2017
New Revision: 254490
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254490&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[arm] Remove semicolon after while {} do (0) in HANDLE_NARROW_SHIFT_ARITH
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82879
Bug ID: 82879
Summary: [8 regression] ICE in max, at profile-count.h:889
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82856
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82856
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82856
>
> Thomas Koenig changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82861
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82863
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82875
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82870
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82875
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82873
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82879
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82872
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82878
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82831
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82864
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
Hmm, I found this on openacc-gcc-7-branch:
...
commit cd69c58db3f41ac72c20bc9b780772ab7e0c113e
Author: Chung-Lin Tang
Date: Tue Jul 25 15:02:26 2017 +
OpenACC async re-work
...
li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82869
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82869
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82833
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82871
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71942
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael.rosbacke at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82614
--- Comment #10 from Marco Castelluccio ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9)
> (In reply to Marco Castelluccio from comment #8)
> > Created attachment 42462 [details]
> > Archive with GCNO and GCDA file generated with GCC 6
> >
> > Thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82614
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #11 from Martin Lišk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82614
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
So problem is quite simple, there's a branch counter that has negative value:
$ ./gcov-dump -l Unified_cpp_js_src31.gcda
...
Unified_cpp_js_src31.gcda: 0100: 3:FUNCTION ident=642196265,
lineno_checks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82792
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
I've got patch for that, will send to mailing list soon.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80131
--- Comment #7 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Tue Nov 7 12:23:38 2017
New Revision: 254496
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254496&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR80131: Simplification of 1U << (31 - x)
Currently the code A << (B - C) is not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80131
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82870
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82870
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81884
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||webstrand at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71026
--- Comment #8 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Tue Nov 7 12:38:55 2017
New Revision: 254497
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254497&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR71026: Canonicalize negates in division
Canonicalize x / (- y) into (-x) / y.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81712
Jan Smets changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jan.smets at nokia dot com
--- Comment #7 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82880
Bug ID: 82880
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] gcc --help=target --help=optimizers
hangs on mips
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82879
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82878
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58774
Shawn Landden changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slandden at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58774
--- Comment #5 from Shawn Landden ---
Appears fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82878
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82878
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82835
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82837
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82732
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-254487-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nographite-amd64
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20171107 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82703
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82732
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82732
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For this exact testcase anywhere in between ldist and strlen pass, so e.g. in
dom or strlen passes. Though it would need to be something that handles what
vrp handles with ASSERT_EXPRs.
Yet another option is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82732
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Given that both DOM and strlen are already dom walker based, getting better
range information in them is going to be easy. The former is actually part of
the motivation behind the refactoring work.
We actu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82882
Bug ID: 82882
Summary: [8 regression] ICE Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82404
--- Comment #10 from Antony Polukhin ---
Do we need a autotest on that to make sure that cmp won't appear again?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82883
Bug ID: 82883
Summary: eax register unnecessary consumed
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82882
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82881
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65428
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #5 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82884
Bug ID: 82884
Summary: ICE in gfc_resolve_character_array_constructor, at
fortran/array.c:2069
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82885
Bug ID: 82885
Summary: memcpy does not propagate aliasing knowledge
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82886
Bug ID: 82886
Summary: ICE with -finit-derived in gfc_conv_expr, at
fortran/trans-expr.c:7807
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82886
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
A possible reduction :
$ cat z1.f90
program p
use, intrinsic :: iso_c_binding, only: c_ptr, c_null_ptr
type t
type(c_ptr) :: my_c_ptr
end type
contains
subroutine sub0() bind(c)
type(t), tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82884
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
--- Comment #42 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Nov 7 17:37:29 2017
New Revision: 254503
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254503&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/53037
* stor-layout.c: Include attribs.h.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82886
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82887
Bug ID: 82887
Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2287 (unrecognizable
insn) with _mm512_extracti64x4_epi64
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81149
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81149
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82885
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
gcc (illegally) generates some calls to memcpy(p,q,n) where p and q may be the
same pointer, although they mustn't overlap in any more complicated way. That
makes such an optimization problematic (although this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71942
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Rosbacke ---
Previous bug i filed was marked as a duplicate of this. Collecting my
information from that report here. Same basic problem, slightly different
symptom.
--- old text ---
I used the following code on arm-gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82888
Bug ID: 82888
Summary: terrible code generation for initialization of POD
array members vs. clang
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82869
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82888
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
-O3 produces the memset:
_ZN1AC2Ev:
.LFB1:
.cfi_startproc
mov x2, 4096
mov w1, 0
b memset
.cfi_endproc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82888
--- Comment #2 from jseward at acm dot org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> -O3 produces the memset:
Having to go to -O3 to get reasonable code isn't a great solution, though.
Couldn't gcc at least produce a word-at-a-time loop,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82888
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Froyd ---
Thanks, I didn't think to test -O3. Do we get the memset at -O3 because loop
idiom recognition is enabled?
Producing the memset upfront probably generates better code for all cases, even
if the frontend code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82888
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
The front-end internally uses VEC_INIT_EXPR, and gimplifies it to a loop. I
believe we should end up with an empty CONSTRUCTOR instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80425
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Nov 7 18:51:22 2017
New Revision: 254505
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254505&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/80425
* config/i386.i386.md (*zero_exten
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82888
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81096
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925
--- Comment #28 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
FWIW I am still seeing these fail:
FAIL: g++.dg/vect/slp-pr56812.cc -std=c++11 scan-tree-dump-times slp1 "basic
block vectorized" 1 (found 0 times)
FAIL: g++.dg/vect/slp-pr56812.cc -std=c++14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80425
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ra |
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82812
--- Comment #3 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Tue Nov 7 19:11:08 2017
New Revision: 254507
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254507&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix SSE bits dependencies.
gcc/
PR target/82812
* commo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82272
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82768
Casey Carter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Casey at Carter dot net
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82831
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
The problematic block (for which we trigger the assert is):
(gdb) p debug_bb(bb)
(code_label 8952 8954 310 18 1247 (nil) [2 uses])
(note 310 8952 311 18 [bb 18] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
(insn:TI 311 310 313 18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82889
Bug ID: 82889
Summary: Unnecessary sign extension of int32 to int64
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82890
Bug ID: 82890
Summary: Demangler segfaults
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: demangler
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82855
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 7 20:48:35 2017
New Revision: 254509
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254509&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/82855
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_swap_binary_ope
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82855
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 7 20:49:30 2017
New Revision: 254510
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254510&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/82855
* config/i386/i386.md (SWI1248_AVX512BWDQ2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82835
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 7 20:51:05 2017
New Revision: 254511
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254511&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82835
* cp-gimplify.c (cxx_omp_clause_apply_fn): Fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82835
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82891
Bug ID: 82891
Summary: stable_sort() won't compile with function object that
takes parameters by non-const reference
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82892
Bug ID: 82892
Summary: Spelling hints do not take into account missing
compiler options (e.g. -fopenmp)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82893
Bug ID: 82893
Summary: Bad diagnostic on negative sized array
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82886
Fritz Reese changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82272
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I should point out that expanding to the tokens 0 and 1 for C does not in
any way prevent warning (it's a perfectly reasonable optional style
warning); you could for example have the prepro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 82839, which changed state.
Bug 82839 Summary: missing -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82839
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19430
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arnd at linaro dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82839
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
--- Comment #81 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
*** Bug 82810 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82810
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 82810, which changed state.
Bug 82810 Summary: missed uninitialized variable warning in for/while loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82810
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s-beyer at gmx dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82552
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 82552, which changed state.
Bug 82552 Summary: No warning when using uninitialized values in initializer
list
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82552
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
