https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81874
--- Comment #4 from zwzhangwen.zhang at huawei dot com ---
I have checked it can be hidden or fixed in gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@239421
But it fixed PR71654 and it affected comparision expr?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82229
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70754
--- Comment #16 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Steve Ellcey from comment #15)
> Is this still being considered for backporting?
sorry for letting this slip away. For backport, patch for PR79663 is also
needed., it fixes a regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81355
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Sep 19 08:12:58 2017
New Revision: 252965
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252965&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Ignore empty string in target attribute (PR c++/81355).
2017-09-19 Marti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81355
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Sep 19 08:18:02 2017
New Revision: 252967
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252967&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Ignore empty string in target attribute (PR c++/81355).
2017-09-19 Mart
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)
> A "simple" patch like the following seems to "work".
>
> Index: gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c
> ===
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859
Bug 59859 depends on bug 69728, which changed state.
Bug 69728 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in
outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1175
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728
What|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80069
Bug 80069 depends on bug 69728, which changed state.
Bug 69728 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in
outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1175
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728
What|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80105
Bug 80105 depends on bug 69728, which changed state.
Bug 69728 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in
outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1175
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728
What|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77634
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63250
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 19 08:25:17 2017
New Revision: 252968
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252968&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-19 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/69728
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79622
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, spop at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79622
>
> --- Comment #8 from Sebastian Pop ---
> > I would have expected at least each memory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82244
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82240
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #1)
> It refers to the source files generated from this file. You need to look at
> the context to see which file was actually compiled.
g++ -fno-PIE -c -g -O3 -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82244
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81355
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Sep 19 09:03:05 2017
New Revision: 252970
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252970&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Ignore empty string in target attribute (PR c++/81355).
2017-09-19 Mart
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82229
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70945
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, can't we just add the __*_finite aliases (or wrappers) to the nvptx newlib?
That sounds easiest to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82240
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jh at suse dot cz,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82240
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Can you please post configure (and build?) flags?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82246
Bug ID: 82246
Summary: Wrong optimisation of an offset double* attribute
class allocated in stack
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82240
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
BTW: There are some shortcuts taken to ease macroization, so these warnings
could belong to patterns that are never generated and thus benign.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82240
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
> Can you please post configure (and build?) flags?
../trunk/configure --prefix=/home/dcb/gcc/results \
--disable-bootstrap \
--disable-multilib \
--di
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70945
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|patch |
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Schwinge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82247
Bug ID: 82247
Summary: [concepts] Name deduction in concepts fails depending
on the argument type
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82248
Bug ID: 82248
Summary: probe_stack can generate unpredictable STR on arm
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68988
--- Comment #5 from Alexander Monakov ---
Author: amonakov
Date: Tue Sep 19 10:16:20 2017
New Revision: 252972
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252972&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
lra: make reload_pseudo_compare_func a proper comparator
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57878
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Monakov ---
Author: amonakov
Date: Tue Sep 19 10:16:20 2017
New Revision: 252972
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252972&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
lra: make reload_pseudo_compare_func a proper comparator
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57878
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68988
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
th preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 8.0.0 20170919 (experimental)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82250
Bug ID: 82250
Summary: Fortran OpenACC acc_on_device early folding
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
Severity: enhancement
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82251
Bug ID: 82251
Summary: OpenMP omp_is_initial_device early folding
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
Severity: enhancement
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82252
Bug ID: 82252
Summary: src/filesystem/ops.cc:392]: (warning) Identical
condition
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82253
Bug ID: 82253
Summary: internal compiler error: in convert_move, at
expr.c:604 (Regression somewhere between 5.4.0 and
6.2.0))
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82252
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82252
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
What tool produces this warning?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82254
Bug ID: 82254
Summary: std::is_nothrow_invocable is broken
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82246
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Taking the address of array [-1] is undefined according to the c standard.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82244
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 19 11:57:39 2017
New Revision: 252973
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252973&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-19 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/82244
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82254
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82244
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Summary|[7/8 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82252
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> What tool produces this warning?
cppcheck, available from sourceforge.
My apologies for the false positive.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82253
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82247
--- Comment #1 from Joël Lamotte ---
Just so that it's clear, it's on godbolt's compiler that I tried this:
https://godbolt.org/g/d78J4H
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80213
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859
Bug 59859 depends on bug 80213, which changed state.
Bug 80213 Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at
tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:704
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80213
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82246
--- Comment #2 from erwan.adam at cea dot fr ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Taking the address of array [-1] is undefined according to the c standard.
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for you answer.
Strictly speaking, I don't access direct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859
Bug 59859 depends on bug 80213, which changed state.
Bug 80213 Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at
tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:704
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80213
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80213
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82246
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81068
--- Comment #2 from Piotr Stachura ---
I have to check it deeper.
I have 2 systems - one gentoo and one Ubuntu.
On Ubuntu, code is correct (as I posted in bug report).
When I compile this same code on gentoo (gcc-5.4.0 and gcc-7.2.0) I have this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81715
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82255
Bug ID: 82255
Summary: Vectorizer cost model overcounts cost of some
vectorized loads
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81068
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82255
--- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt ---
Created attachment 42206
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42206&action=edit
Patch under test
Here's a patch I'm testing. It solves the problem for this test case but
hasn't been regstrapp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82255
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82246
--- Comment #4 from erwan.adam at cea dot fr ---
Ok
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82256
Bug ID: 82256
Summary: regression: clones created by
create_version_clone_with_body are not observable to
insertion hooks
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81373
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
The following patch fixes this. We fail to handle scev_analyzable_p
loop-closed
PHIs that are live-out to the region.
Index: gcc/graphite-scop-detection.c
==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81068
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The difference in results isn't very relevant. I'm pretty sure the reason for
the sanitizer errors is that libstdc++.so isn't instrumented by the sanitizers.
If you build libstdc++.so with UBsan you wouldn'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81068
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81068
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
If you use &input_data[7] then you do not have valid UTF-8 input, because it
ends with an incomplete multibyte character, "\xCD", instead of "\CD\x8B"
Hi,
Trust my email discovers you well.
Are you looking out to acquire the list of customers or companies using
Microsoft Dynamics Users Info?
We also have Microsoft Products which you may be interested in:-
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Microsoft Dynamics AX
Microsoft Dynamics ERP
Microsoft Ya
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Sep 19 14:27:32 2017
New Revision: 252976
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252976&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/81854 - weak alias of an incompatible symbol accepted
gcc/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82257
Bug ID: 82257
Summary: f951: Internal compiler error segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728
--- Comment #19 from Sebastian Pop ---
> So how'd we properly handle a valid empty domain?
DCE the statement.
If the domain for a statement is empty, it means that the statement does not
execute: it is dead code.
I think we are better enforcin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82254
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Sep 19 14:33:51 2017
New Revision: 252977
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252977&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/82254 fix std::is_nothrow_invocable_r w.r.t throwing convers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82254
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.3
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79622
--- Comment #10 from Sebastian Pop ---
> So a black-box would be a set of stmts rather than a whole GIMPLE BB
Correct: this can be an abstract view of the IR. The only place where we want
to start transforming the code is in the code generation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81373
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop ---
The patch looks good. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258
Bug ID: 82258
Summary: [regression] allocate_zerosize_3.f fails since r251949
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82150
mgretton at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mgretton at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80295
--- Comment #4 from Qing Zhao ---
working on a fix to this bug.
let me know if you are working on it too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80295
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47769
Peter Cordes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter at cordes dot ca
--- Comment #6 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82259
Bug ID: 82259
Summary: missed optimization: use LEA to add 1 to flip the low
bit when copying before AND with 1
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Ke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82259
--- Comment #1 from Peter Cordes ---
More generally, you can flip a higher bit while copying with
lea 64(%rdi), %eax
That leaves the bits above that position munged by carry-out, but that isn't
always a problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82260
Bug ID: 82260
Summary: [x86] Unnecessary use of 8-bit registers with -Os.
slightly slower and larger code
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82259
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Peter Cordes from comment #0)
> Related:
>
> bool bt_unsigned(unsigned x, unsigned bit) {
> //bit = 13;
> return !(x & (1< }
>
> movl%esi, %ecx
> movl$1,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82259
--- Comment #3 from Peter Cordes ---
Oops, BT sets CF, not ZF. So
bt $13, %edi
setnc %al# aka setae
ret
This is what clang does for the bt_ functions, and might be optimal for many
use-cases. (For br
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71500
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Sep 19 17:06:12 2017
New Revision: 252981
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252981&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/71500 restore C++11 compatibility in
PR libstdc++
;>= (32-n); //&31;
return a|b;
}
// https://godbolt.org/g/3jbgbR
g++ (GCC-Explorer-Build) 8.0.0 20170919 -O3 -march=haswell
movl$32, %eax
subl%edx, %eax # missed optimization: NEG would work
shrx%eax, %esi, %eax
shlx%edx, %edi,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82229
--- Comment #11 from krzysio.kurek at wp dot pl ---
Done, cmake will now default to Release config with altered compiler flags that
include -flto.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82261
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
Related to PR 55583.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81647
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Wil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25071
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|janus at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82229
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82240
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this due to the following from atom.md:
(define_insn_reservation "atom_icmp" 1
(and (eq_attr "cpu" "atom")
(and (eq_attr "type" "icmp")
(eq_attr "memory" "none")))
"atom-simple
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82229
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
One another observation: using PGO (-fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use), both
GCC 6 and GCC 7 have similar performance: 34fps. While GCC 6 has 43 fps on my
machine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81903
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82150
--- Comment #5 from david.welch at netronome dot com ---
it is definitely doing prefetching by not realizing those instructions are
unconditional branches. most likely going with strongly ordered rather than
the XN bit but noted as a workaround.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82240
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82262
Bug ID: 82262
Summary: std::hash>::operator() missing
remove_const_t
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82263
Bug ID: 82263
Summary: java multilib -m32 version is using 64 bit include and
lib, _GStaticAssertCompileTimeAssertion_0
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
