https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81715
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I can confirm that for the biggest function 'nl80211_send_wiphy', it really contains majority of stack variables which are 4B large. Having an adaptive redzone mechanism, one can effectively save half of stack. That will still not be enough for 1024B. Anyway, I there's another example where one needs to limit (or disable ASAN) in kernel: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9653417/ Jakub what's your opinion on this?