https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78889
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
May I close the PR as resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81829
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #3)
> marxin's patch:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-08/msg01116.html
>
> But this patch doesn't work while /my_bin/bin contains a symlink.
Can you please des
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81994
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81987
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82001
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82002
Bug ID: 82002
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in sp_valid_at, at
config/i386/i386.c:13233
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81981
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81979
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81977
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|X86_64 |x86_64-*-*
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81973
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Just use the mangled symbol name instead of the alias?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81993
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81992
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81988
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81987
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
Bug ID: 82003
Summary: Segmentation fault building kmymoney git sources.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81994
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
--- Comment #1 from José Pekkarinen ---
Created attachment 42057
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42057&action=edit
strace of the failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81986
--- Comment #2 from Vittorio Zecca ---
I do not know if this is a libgfortran or a sanitizer bug.
What I do know is that changing string.c:199 from
t = - n;
into
t = -(GFC_UINTEGER_LARGEST)n;
as it should be, the sanitizer message disappears
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81973
--- Comment #3 from Lorenzo Pistone ---
That is not the issue, or maybe I don't understand the suggestion. This program
fails just the same:
#include
using namespace std;
struct b{
int a;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80524
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Wood ---
For info, the actual code I was developing did use the finalization subroutine
to deallocate pointers, which resulted in seg faults when compiled with ifort.
This was how I discovered the problem.
I also repor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81987
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81964
--- Comment #3 from Petr Ovtchenkov ---
Looks "not a bug".
Standard say (with a bit misoriented words):
27.6.1 Class template istream_iterator [istream.iterator]
1 The class template istream_iterator is an input iterator (27.2.3)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81964
Petr Ovtchenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #42035|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80454
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
Bug ID: 82004
Summary: SPEC CPU2017 628.pop2_s miscompare
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
Adam Borowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kilobyte at angband dot pl
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
> On August 25, 2017 4:14:05 PM GMT+02:00, "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE"
[...]
>>My reading is different and corroborates the So
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005
Bug ID: 82005
Summary: The combination of -g and -flto does not work on
darwin
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81723
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 28 10:19:17 2017
New Revision: 251376
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251376&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-28 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81181
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 28 10:19:17 2017
New Revision: 251376
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251376&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-28 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81921
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 28 10:19:17 2017
New Revision: 251376
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251376&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-28 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81988
--- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Reducing the optimization level from -O3 to -O2 also helps here:
(sid_sparc64-dchroot)root@deb4g:/build/ffmpeg-37GVTu/ffmpeg-3.3.3/debian/standard#
gcc -I. -Isrc/ -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 28 Aug 2017, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
>
> --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81181
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81723
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.2.1
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81921
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.2.1
Summary|[5/6/7 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Interesting. I thought it would barf very much earlier ;)
_sinus.c.f4d7e603
shouldn't be defined anywhere which would have been the expected error here.
But the odd issue is there's a "subtraction expres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82002
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80454
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov ---
The bug is that universal zero initializers are warned about when they are
inside of some other initializer, even though we correctly stopped doing that
when they appear on their own. In the following exa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81996
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Know
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80640
--- Comment #8 from Alexander Monakov ---
Author: amonakov
Date: Mon Aug 28 10:58:45 2017
New Revision: 251377
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251377&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
optabs: ensure mem_thread_fence is a compiler barrier
PR t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81316
Bug 81316 depends on bug 80640, which changed state.
Bug 80640 Summary: Missing memory side effect with __atomic_thread_fence (2)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80640
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80640
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
--- Comment #3 from José Pekkarinen ---
Created attachment 42060
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42060&action=edit
preprocesed sources.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81996
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81993
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
So we're creating a template value attribute at late finish time from
(gdb) p debug_generic_expr (e->arg)
{.__pfn=isClassMethod, .__delta=0}
as
(symbol_ref/i:DI ("_ZNK14ObjCMethodDecl13isClassMethodEv") [
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81998
Andrew Schepler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|WA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81977
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Summary|[5/6/7/8 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81977
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 28 11:42:23 2017
New Revision: 251378
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251378&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-28 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/81977
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82006
Bug ID: 82006
Summary: [8 Regression] ERROR: torture-init:
torture_without_loops is not empty as expected
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30811
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2016-02-02 00:00:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
--- Comment #5 from José Pekkarinen ---
I reported that to gcc this morning:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
--- Comment #6 from José Pekkarinen ---
(In reply to José Pekkarinen from comment #5)
> I reported that to gcc this morning:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
Sorry, wrong tab.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69971
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81993
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Thanks. I just successfully built LLVM with -gsplit-dwarf.
Maybe it is time to officially deprecate -gsplit-dwarf?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81993
--- Comment #7 from Sylvestre Ledru ---
Not my call but I am using it to build the llvm toolchain on i386.
Without gsplit-dwarf, I cannot link on the platform, it fails on:
/usr/bin/ld.gold: fatal error: ../../../../lib/liblldb-3.9.so.1: mmap: fa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70075
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70180
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, documentation
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82007
Bug ID: 82007
Summary: DTIO write format stored in a string leads to severe
errors
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81884
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 28 12:16:06 2017
New Revision: 251379
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251379&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-28 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82007
--- Comment #1 from Édouard Canot ---
I omit to say that many lines in the attached source are commented by a double
bang (!!); remove some of them to reveal the bug...
EC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81993
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 28 Aug 2017, sylvestre at debian dot org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81993
>
> --- Comment #7 from Sylvestre Ledru ---
> Not my call but I am using it to build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82006
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80035
--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #2)
> Replacing trap with exit or ret (or adding it after trap), makes the sigsegv
> go away.
Nvidia suggested a workaround of adding exit after trap for this (PR81069
c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70621
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81993
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #8)
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2017, sylvestre at debian dot org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81993
> >
> > --- Comment #7 from Sylvestre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82008
Bug ID: 82008
Summary: nonnull attribute and multiple inheritance
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80932
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 28 12:49:55 2017
New Revision: 251381
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251381&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-28 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81088
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 28 12:49:55 2017
New Revision: 251381
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251381&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-28 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81065
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 28 12:49:55 2017
New Revision: 251381
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251381&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-28 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81065
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81088
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81723
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81987
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Sure, I'll try to get to this this week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81993
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 28 13:13:23 2017
New Revision: 251382
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251382&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-28 Richard Biener
PR debug/81993
* dwarf2o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 28 13:14:28 2017
New Revision: 251384
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251384&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-28 Richard Biener
PR lto/81968
* simple-obj
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82009
Bug ID: 82009
Summary: ICE with block construct
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Guskov ---
Approximately a hundred different variables and function calls, the majority of
which are raised to the second or third power, sometimes fourth or fifth. As
628.pop2_s is mostly written in Fortran 90, all of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82010
Bug ID: 82010
Summary: Inspecting a function parameter of "vec *&path" from gdb yields nonsense.
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70196
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70380
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81923
Maxim Ostapenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.ostapenko at samsung dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #44 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82011
Bug ID: 82011
Summary: [8 regression] early lto debug causes dsymutil warning
on Darwin
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82011
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81994
--- Comment #2 from Felipe Matas ---
Confirmed, fix the reduced example and the octave compilation problem.
Thx.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72754
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72751
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81926
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou ---
[...]
> Rainer, do you test Go in this configuration (system as + ld)?
Sorry for the long delay: I've been mostly away for 6 weeks, only now
cat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81954
Yui NARUSE changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81900
Yui NARUSE changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||naruse at airemix dot jp
--- Comment #10 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69971
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Yes, the warning does exist to warn about unsafe calls to the function (I added
it here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg01702.html). This bug
was meant to suggest a way to make the built-in saf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72754
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.1.3, 4.2.2, 4.3.2, 4.6.0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72754
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82012
Bug ID: 82012
Summary: [8 Regression] libitm build fails for s390x-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81923
--- Comment #2 from Denis Khalikov ---
confgiure flags:
configure_flags="--prefix=/usr --without-cvs --without-selinux
--enable-stackguard-randomization --enable-obsolete-rpc
--disable-sanity-checks"
cc1 invocation:
/home/denis/gcc-build-trunk
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo