https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81319
Bug ID: 81319
Summary: ICE in output_operand_lossage at final.c
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
e-gnu-unique-object --enable-linker-build-id
--with-linker-hash-style=gnu --enable-plugin --enable-initfini-array --with-isl
--enable-libmpx --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --without-cuda-driver
--enable-gnu-indirect-function --with-tune=generic
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81321
Bug ID: 81321
Summary: Segmentation fault - va_list boost_any - gcc5.4.0 -
gcc-snapshot
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81321
--- Comment #1 from Stephan Heinrich ---
Created attachment 41684
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41684&action=edit
source code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81321
--- Comment #2 from Stephan Heinrich ---
Created attachment 41685
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41685&action=edit
preprocessed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79636
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeccav at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81295
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81309
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81295
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7 Regression] bootstrap|bootstrap broken on
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81322
Bug ID: 81322
Summary: -fsanitize=address ICE in prepare_function_start, at
function.c
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81323
Bug ID: 81323
Summary: IPA-VRP doesn't handle return values
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80266
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80838
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
--- Comment #14 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81324
Bug ID: 81324
Summary: libgo does not build with glibc 2.18
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68384
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2016-01-21 00:00:00 |2017-7-5
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81321
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58796
--- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think this can be backported safely, maybe to gcc-5-branch too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81305
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Jul 5 12:28:19 2017
New Revision: 249995
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249995&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/81305
* config/avr/avr.c (avr_out_movhi_mr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81305
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Jul 5 12:34:36 2017
New Revision: 249996
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249996&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/81305
* testsuite/gcc.target/avr/isr-test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81305
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Jul 5 12:49:08 2017
New Revision: 249998
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249998&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2017-07-05 trunk r249995.
PR target/81
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81298
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46742
Franz Sirl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80838
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
OK, found the problem. LTO binary is built with -fPIC because of the way we
merge options. I saw the same problem previously on Firefox. It is easy
mistake to do. I think we should
1) warn in this case
2)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81305
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81325
Bug ID: 81325
Summary: -fcompare-debug failure on ppc64le
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81072
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Jul 5 13:57:28 2017
New Revision: 25
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=25&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Graceful degrade if Binutils PR21472 is not available.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80838
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Nice! I now get a ~2% improvement on the tramp3d testcase with PGO/LTO.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80818
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Created attachment 41686
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41686&action=edit
A proposed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80818
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Hi, Andreas.
Could you check the patch I attached on your bigger test case. If it works, I
will commit it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50402
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8.0 |8.0
--- Comment #6 from Vittorio Zecca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46742
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81326
Bug ID: 81326
Summary: gcc-ar: Cannot find plugin 'liblto_plugin.so' Mac
Sierra Xcode 8.3.3
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81326
--- Comment #1 from mwindham ---
See https://solarianprogrammer.com/2017/05/21/compiling-gcc-macos/ in comment
Vincent Le Bourlot • 15 days ago
Trying to get gcc working on my mac Sierra, I tried your tuto, but using the
newly compiled gcc-ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81326
--- Comment #2 from mwindham ---
See https://solarianprogrammer.com/2017/05/21/compiling-gcc-macos/ in comment
Vincent Le Bourlot • 15 days ago
Trying to get gcc working on my mac Sierra, I tried your tuto, but using the
newly compiled gcc-ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50402
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> This is still in trunk 249883
Did you fixed it? If no, the only relevant information would be to report that
it has been fixed.
> The test case may be wrong, but
>
> 1) gfortran should never crash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033
--- Comment #18 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10)
> The last patch in comment 8 exposes another problem: buf[128] is too small.
>
> The following patch which uses the trick proposed in IRC by Richi to spl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327
Bug ID: 81327
Summary: cast to void* does not suppress -Wclass-memaccess
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81326
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80266
--- Comment #2 from Wilco ---
Fixing aarch64_classify_address means we now reject incorrect addresses,
however GCC midend generates a lot of 32-bit pointers which are not correctly
changed into addresses, resulting in even more assertions. So the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81326
--- Comment #4 from mwindham ---
See Bug 63758
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68649
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81147
--- Comment #3 from Felipe Magno de Almeida ---
It actually compiles for me because I have enabled libstdc++v3 for avr target.
But I'm attaching a new one without the unnecessary includes.
Line command to compile:
avr-g++ -std=c++14 -fno-excepti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81147
Felipe Magno de Almeida changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41594|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79203
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80510
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79799
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79202
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81328
Bug ID: 81328
Summary: Wrong order of error messages
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50402
--- Comment #8 from Vittorio Zecca ---
1) Sometimes error reports slip through the cracks, it happened to me,
and I found it's good
to remind that the bug is still around. Sometimes it happened the
contrary, the bug silently
disappears bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80103
--- Comment #4 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kelvin
Date: Wed Jul 5 20:51:37 2017
New Revision: 250008
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250008&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-07-05 Kelvin Nilsen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81147
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81329
Bug ID: 81329
Summary: Missing -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81329
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81329
--- Comment #2 from Tudor Bosman ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> There are a few duplicates of this bug floating around.
I figured, but I don't know anything about gcc internals to tell which of these
duplicates are the same bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81330
Bug ID: 81330
Summary: missing strlen optimization with intervening memcpy
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81331
Bug ID: 81331
Summary: [8 Regression] FAIL:
21_strings/basic_string/modifiers/insert/char/1.cc
execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81332
Bug ID: 81332
Summary: GCC crash during "RTL pass: expand" -
verify_flow_info: REG_BR_PROB does not match cfg
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81333
Bug ID: 81333
Summary: Bad alignment of global variables on Alpha
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81333
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81333
--- Comment #2 from mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz ---
Created attachment 41691
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41691&action=edit
another testcase
Another testcase - note that even if we have two static variables in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81333
--- Comment #3 from mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz ---
> Only C11 and above. C99 and C98 does not have any requirements like that :)
Accessing any variable with the char pointer is allowed in C89 and newer
standards. Threading is not co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80775
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #17 from Peter Bergne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81334
Bug ID: 81334
Summary: -Wmisleading-indentation
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81328
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
65 matches
Mail list logo
