[Bug rtl-optimization/80197] pgo dramatically pessimizes scimark2 MonteCarlo benchmark

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80197 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80197 > > --- Comment #5 from Alexander Monakov --- > On trunk, manually fixing up inlining

[Bug tree-optimization/80248] New: sparse access to Array of structures does not vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80248 Bug ID: 80248 Summary: sparse access to Array of structures does not vectorize Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c++/80247] 'nullptr' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80247 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80244] [6/7 Regression] ICE with attribute in template alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80244 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug c++/80241] [5/6/7 Regression] Broken error message + ICE with invalid attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80241 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Priority|P3

[Bug target/80239] [7 regression] 9% regression on dhrystone when targetting Cortex-M7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80239 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/80238] genmatch.c:(.text.startup+0x66c6): undefined reference to `operator delete(void*, unsigned long)'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80238 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Target|

[Bug libstdc++/68397] std::tr1::expint fails in __expint_En_cont_frac for some long double arguments due to low __max_iter value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68397 --- Comment #1 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> --- I concur with this solution. I can make a patch.

[Bug c++/80247] 'nullptr' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80247 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Sumit from comment #0) > I am migrating my code from 3.4.5 to 4.8.1 and enabled c++11 using Why would you choose 4.8.1 and not 4.8.5 ? There are lots of bug fixes in later 4.8.x releases, espe

[Bug c++/80240] cannot dynamic_cast variable to intmax_t from variable of type intmax_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80240 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/dynamic_cast Please stop reporting a bug every time your code doesn't compile.

[Bug c++/80243] c++ doesn't allow function to return a struct (or object?) - same thing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80243 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jim Michaels from comment #0) > c++ doesn't allow function to return a struct. Of course it does. Please stop reporting a bug every time your code doesn't compile, or you misunderstand how C+

[Bug tree-optimization/80237] float to double conversion is not optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80237 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug c++/80247] 'nullptr' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80247 --- Comment #3 from Sumit --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Provide a testcase. It works for me. Testcase: > > void *p = nullptr; > > > g++-4.8 t.C -S -std=c++11 > > Note that GCC 4.8 is no longer maintained, please use at l

[Bug c++/80247] 'nullptr' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80247 --- Comment #4 from Sumit --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > (In reply to Sumit from comment #0) > > I am migrating my code from 3.4.5 to 4.8.1 and enabled c++11 using > > Why would you choose 4.8.1 and not 4.8.5 ? There are lot

[Bug c++/80247] 'nullptr' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80247 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ada/80117] Standard'Word_Size is wrong for aarch64 ILP32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80117 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80239] [7 regression] 9% regression on dhrystone when targetting Cortex-M7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80239 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #1) > > I believe the problem is that the equivalence stays with NO_REGS as register > class instead of being given that of a register (since it's going to b

[Bug libstdc++/68397] std::tr1::expint fails in __expint_En_cont_frac for some long double arguments due to low __max_iter value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68397 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/68397] std::tr1::expint fails in __expint_En_cont_frac for some long double arguments due to low __max_iter value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68397 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|trivial |normal

[Bug c++/80243] c++ doesn't allow function to return a struct (or object?) - same thing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80243 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Your second example doesn't compile for a very simple reason: (In reply to Jim Michaels from comment #1) > #include > #include > typedef struct {std::string s;int i;} Structsb; > Structsb fn(std::string

[Bug tree-optimization/79534] [7 Regression] tree-ifcombine aarch64 performance regression with trunk@245151

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79534 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80244] [6/7 Regression] ICE with attribute in template alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80244 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/80249] New: Failed to build SPEC 2006 483.xalancbmk with -fdump-tree-fre

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80249 Bug ID: 80249 Summary: Failed to build SPEC 2006 483.xalancbmk with -fdump-tree-fre Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug fortran/78881] [F03] reading from string with DTIO procedure does not work properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78881 Jiong Wang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #22 f

[Bug target/80250] New: ICE in in final_scan_insn, at final.c:3025 for __builtin_ia32_vp4dpwssds_mask builtin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80250 Bug ID: 80250 Summary: ICE in in final_scan_insn, at final.c:3025 for __builtin_ia32_vp4dpwssds_mask builtin Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug target/80250] ICE in in final_scan_insn, at final.c:3025 for __builtin_ia32_vp4dpwssds_mask builtin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80250 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Started with r242569.

[Bug tree-optimization/80248] sparse access to Array of structures does not vectorize using gathers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80248 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/80181] [7 Regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:505

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80181 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Mar 29 09:28:46 2017 New Revision: 246561 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246561&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-03-29 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug ipa/78644] [7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in is_gimple_reg_type with -Og -fipa-cp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78644 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Mar 29 09:28:46 2017 New Revision: 246561 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246561&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-03-29 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug tree-optimization/80249] Failed to build SPEC 2006 483.xalancbmk with -fdump-tree-fre

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80249 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ipa/79931] ICE in dump_possible_polymorphic_call_targets with -fdump-ipa-all -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79931 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sudi.das at arm dot com --- Comment #6 fr

[Bug fortran/80235] ICE: coarrays, submodule

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80235 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/79441] [7 regression] gnat.dg/pack9.adb fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79441 --- Comment #4 from Dominik Vogt --- Any chance of fixing that before gcc7?

[Bug testsuite/79356] XPASS in attr-alloc_size-11.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356 --- Comment #12 from Dominik Vogt --- Still XPASSes on s390 (but not s390x with -m31 or -m64).

[Bug ada/79441] [7 regression] gnat.dg/pack9.adb fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79441 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- > Any chance of fixing that before gcc7? Probably not, the underlying issue is in the SRA pass and not a regression.

[Bug testsuite/79356] XPASS in attr-alloc_size-11.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356 --- Comment #13 from Dominik Vogt --- Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg01468.html

[Bug c++/80247] 'nullptr' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80247 Sumit changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|WAITING Resolution|INVALID

[Bug fortran/80235] ICE: coarrays, submodule

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80235 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Reduced submodule submodule ( m ) sm contains module subroutine cgca_pfem_map( origin, rot, bcol, bcou ) implicit none real( kind=rdef ), intent( in ) ::

[Bug c++/80247] 'nullptr' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80247 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/80233] [7 Regression] ICE in combine_instructions w/ -O2 (and above)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80233 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- How about this patch instead? --- a/gcc/combine.c +++ b/gcc/combine.c @@ -1250,7 +1250,8 @@ combine_instructions (rtx_insn *f, unsigned int nregs) continue; while (last_combined_i

[Bug rtl-optimization/80233] [7 Regression] ICE in combine_instructions w/ -O2 (and above)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80233 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #3

[Bug rtl-optimization/80233] [7 Regression] ICE in combine_instructions w/ -O2 (and above)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80233 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- But only at runtime, it is fine if it is never executed. So I think it is still ice-on-valid-code.

[Bug libstdc++/80251] New: Is the is_aggregate meta function missing?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80251 Bug ID: 80251 Summary: Is the is_aggregate meta function missing? Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstd

[Bug target/80239] [7 regression] 9% regression on dhrystone when targetting Cortex-M7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80239 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78881] [F03] reading from string with DTIO procedure does not work properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78881 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/80252] New: ICE in plus_constant, at explow.c:88 with -fstack-check -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80252 Bug ID: 80252 Summary: ICE in plus_constant, at explow.c:88 with -fstack-check -mabi=ilp32 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/80252] ICE in plus_constant, at explow.c:88 with -fstack-check -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80252 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 --- Comment #20 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Wed Mar 29 12:56:26 2017 New Revision: 246567 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246567&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-03-29 Bill Schmidt PR tree-optimization/80158

[Bug target/80252] ICE in plus_constant, at explow.c:88 with -fstack-check -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80252 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/79993] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in tree_to_uhwi, at tree.c:7344

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79993 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41072 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41072&action=edit gcc7-pr79993.patch So, one option is to revert to the 4.8 and earlier behavior, disallow any VLA initialization

[Bug tree-optimization/79981] Forwprop not working for __atomic_compare_exchange_n

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79981 Dominik Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79487] Invalid _Decimal32 comparison on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79487 Dominik Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/80253] New: Optimization silences __attribute__((fallthrough)) warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80253 Bug ID: 80253 Summary: Optimization silences __attribute__((fallthrough)) warning Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug target/80252] ICE in plus_constant, at explow.c:88 with -fstack-check -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80252 Jiong Wang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug debug/80234] [7 Regression] ICE in splice_child_die at dwarfout.c:5265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80234 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to tim from comment #0) > The code snippet is about as minimal as I can get it and still reproduce the > error. If I make the destructor non-virtual or get rid of the definition of > foo::name_str,

[Bug target/78002] gcc.target/aarch64/stack-checking.c ICEs with -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78002 Jiong Wang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Comment #4 from J

[Bug target/78002] gcc.target/aarch64/stack-checking.c ICEs with -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78002 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug libstdc++/80165] Constexpr tuple of variant doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80165 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com

[Bug rtl-optimization/80197] pgo dramatically pessimizes scimark2 MonteCarlo benchmark

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80197 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Monakov --- No, with fixed-up inlining -ftracer sees reasonable edge probabilities. The reason tracer makes things worse here, is that it clones the path leading to a 50%/50% conditional branch (and correctly stops a

[Bug ada/80146] [7 regression] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:612

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80146 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab --- Author: schwab Date: Wed Mar 29 14:18:07 2017 New Revision: 246570 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246570&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ada/80146 * calls.c (prepare_call_address): Convert f

[Bug fortran/80254] New: Windows test failure: dec_io_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80254 Bug ID: 80254 Summary: Windows test failure: dec_io_2.f90 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/80254] Windows test failure: dec_io_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80254 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/79534] [7 Regression] tree-ifcombine aarch64 performance regression with trunk@245151

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79534 --- Comment #6 from Brian Rzycki --- James, my apologies if it wasn't clear enough what the compile options were. The test platform in this case is a Juno A57 running Ubuntu. I actually never turned off -mcpu=cortex-a57 during my testing. I'll k

[Bug middle-end/69578] -Wuninitialized not issuing warning.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69578 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/80250] ICE in in final_scan_insn, at final.c:3025 for __builtin_ia32_vp4dpwssds_mask builtin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80250 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/80250] ICE in in final_scan_insn, at final.c:3025 for __builtin_ia32_vp4dpwssds_mask builtin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80250 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug fortran/80254] Windows test failure: dec_io_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80254 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/32826] Reduction into a global variable causes a Load Hit Store Hazard (for the Cell)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32826 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/69578] -Wuninitialized not issuing warning.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69578 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- It is a dup of all the uninit PRs caused by CCP turning PHI into X (X=10 here).

[Bug fortran/80254] Windows test failure: dec_io_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80254 --- Comment #3 from nightstrike --- The cygwin default line ending style is UNIX like.

[Bug debug/80234] [7 Regression] ICE in splice_child_die at dwarfout.c:5265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80234 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41075 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41075&action=edit gcc7-pr80234.patch Untested fix.

[Bug target/31557] return 0x80000000UL code gen can be improved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31557 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/31557] return 0x80000000UL code gen can be improved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31557 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug middle-end/66447] -Werror=maybe-uninitialized indicates trashing of variable across longjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66447 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/80238] genmatch.c:(.text.startup+0x66c6): undefined reference to `operator delete(void*, unsigned long)'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80238 --- Comment #2 from Mike --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > That's the sized-deallocation function which was new in GCC 5. > > How did you configure gcc? > > What is your existing compiler that you're using to build it? My inf

[Bug fortran/80254] Windows test failure: dec_io_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80254 --- Comment #4 from nightstrike --- (In reply to nightstrike from comment #3) > The cygwin default line ending style is UNIX like. This test currently passes on cygwin as-is.

[Bug fortran/80254] Windows test failure: dec_io_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80254 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 41076 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41076&action=edit Proposed test case for mingw

[Bug fortran/80254] Windows test failure: dec_io_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80254 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 41077 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41077&action=edit Patch for failing test case The patch works for me on linux (i.e. the test is still execuated, and doesn't fail

[Bug c/80253] Optimization silences __attribute__((fallthrough)) warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80253 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/80253] Optimization silences __attribute__((fallthrough)) warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80253 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Looks like expand_FALLTHROUGH_r should be using case_label_p.

[Bug fortran/80254] Windows test failure: dec_io_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80254 --- Comment #7 from nightstrike --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #6) > Created attachment 41077 [details] > Patch for failing test case > > The patch works for me on linux (i.e. the test is still > execuated, and doesn't fail). The _

[Bug target/80108] ICE in aggregate_value_p at function.c:2028

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80108 kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/80254] Windows test failure: dec_io_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80254 --- Comment #8 from nightstrike --- (In reply to nightstrike from comment #7) > (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #6) > > Created attachment 41077 [details] > > Patch for failing test case > > > > The patch works for me on linux (i.e. the

[Bug fortran/80254] Windows test failure: dec_io_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80254 --- Comment #9 from nightstrike --- Ok, your new _2a test just for mingw works like a champ: # of expected passes12

[Bug target/80108] ICE in aggregate_value_p at function.c:2028

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80108 --- Comment #3 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kelvin Date: Wed Mar 29 17:23:58 2017 New Revision: 246572 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246572&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Use this branch for work on PR 80108. Added: branches/i

[Bug fortran/80254] Windows test failure: dec_io_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80254 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Wed Mar 29 17:30:58 2017 New Revision: 246573 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246573&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-03-28 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/80254 * gfortra

[Bug fortran/80254] Windows test failure: dec_io_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80254 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/80255] New: Segfault from accessing class(*) component in an array of any-type-wrappers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80255 Bug ID: 80255 Summary: Segfault from accessing class(*) component in an array of any-type-wrappers Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug fortran/80255] Segfault from accessing class(*) component in an array of any-type-wrappers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80255 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/80108] ICE in aggregate_value_p at function.c:2028

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80108 --- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt --- (In reply to kelvin from comment #2) > I'm seeking consensus on the "right thing to do". Should I make sure that > -mpower9-minmax turns on whatever additional target options are necessary in > order to make t

[Bug target/80108] ICE in aggregate_value_p at function.c:2028

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80108 --- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner --- On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:14:38PM +, kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80108 > > kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug target/80108] ICE in aggregate_value_p at function.c:2028

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80108 --- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt --- For stage 4, fixing this particular error combination (along with what Mike suggests) should be enough. There is a vast array of ridiculous option combinations that should no doubt be rejected, but let's not

[Bug c++/80177] wrong fixit hint for misspelled static_assert: __cpp_static_assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80177 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/80046] [F03] Explicit interface required: pointer argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80046 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|un

[Bug middle-end/33086] warn for read-only uninitialized variables passed as arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33086 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/10138] warn for uninitialized arrays passed as const* arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10138 --- Comment #27 from Martin Sebor --- *** Bug 33086 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/10138] warn for uninitialized arrays passed as const* arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10138 Bug 10138 depends on bug 33086, which changed state. Bug 33086 Summary: warn for read-only uninitialized variables passed as arguments https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33086 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/79234] warn on past the end reads by library functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79234 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/80108] ICE in aggregate_value_p at function.c:2028

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80108 --- Comment #7 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'll pursue the recommendations offered by Michael and Bill. Aside: as I read the existing implementation, I believe the more "consistent" behavior would be to behave as suggested in my original "

[Bug sanitizer/79993] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in tree_to_uhwi, at tree.c:7344

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79993 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > Created attachment 41072 [details] > gcc7-pr79993.patch > > So, one option is to revert to the 4.8 and earlier behavior, disallow any > VLA initialization (like

  1   2   >