https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80108
--- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner <meissner at linux dot vnet.ibm.com> --- On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:14:38PM +0000, kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80108 > > kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #2 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- > I'm seeking consensus on the "right thing to do". Should I make sure that > -mpower9-minmax turns on whatever additional target options are necessary in > order to make this work? My opinion is if -mcpu=<xxx> is not set, then -mpower9-minmax should set -mcpu=power9. However, -mno-power9-minmax should not set anything. If -mcpu=<xxx> is not -mcpu=power9, then this is an eror.