https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38573
--- Comment #11 from Frederic Marchal ---
(In reply to Roland Illig from comment #9)
> (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #7)
> > /* Otherwise, fail. */
> > if (symstd)
> > *symstd = _(symstd_msg);
> > return false;
> >
> > Where
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80128
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
I only see an empty page. Can you please attach the patch here?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80136
--- Comment #12 from Christophe Lyon ---
Following Jakub's recommendation, I applied this:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-stdarg.c b/gcc/tree-stdarg.c
index 18dd972..edf47d1 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-stdarg.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-stdarg.c
@@ -1061,8 +1061,7 @@ exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80136
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #12)
> Following Jakub's recommendation, I applied this:
>
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-stdarg.c b/gcc/tree-stdarg.c
> index 18dd972..edf47d1 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-std
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80136
--- Comment #14 from Christophe Lyon ---
Ha yes, sorry I did see the warning, but I was focused on build completion.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80114
--- Comment #11 from Jani Nikula ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #10)
> May I close this as worksforme?
If the conclusion is that the magnitude of the code size bloat demonstrated in
https://godbolt.org/g/hgS817 is expected, then go a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80141
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80143
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80145
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80117
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
> So the real bug is that Standard'Word_Size doesn't follow -mabi. Surely
> there should be no need to copy the whole file just to change Word_Size.
That's what we do for x32 though, as there is no general
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80146
Bug ID: 80146
Summary: [7 regression] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at
explow.c:612
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80142
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80117
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ---
> What is the definition of System.Word_Size anyway?
The language RM says (13.7/32):
Word_Size
The number of bits per word.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80136
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80135
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80146
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80117
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
*** Bug 80146 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80117
Bug 80117 depends on bug 80146, which changed state.
Bug 80146 Summary: ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:612
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80146
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79906
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 09:21:56 2017
New Revision: 246345
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246345&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Error message on target attribute on power target (PR target/79906)
2017-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80146
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80117
Bug 80117 depends on bug 80146, which changed state.
Bug 80146 Summary: [7 regression] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:612
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80146
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80117
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab ---
So what's a word then? Obviously, UNITS_PER_WORD does not fit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80117
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ---
*** Bug 80146 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80146
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80117
Bug 80117 depends on bug 80146, which changed state.
Bug 80146 Summary: ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:612
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80146
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80146
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80117
Bug 80117 depends on bug 80146, which changed state.
Bug 80146 Summary: ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:612
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80146
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80117
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ---
> So what's a word then? Obviously, UNITS_PER_WORD does not fit.
I think that UNITS_PER_WORD is correct for Word_Size, the problem lies more in
the definition of Memory_Size and Address:
Memory_Size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80147
Bug ID: 80147
Summary: missing maybe-uninitialized warning on variable with
no side effects
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80138
--- Comment #3 from Julien Pommier ---
I agree spurious was not the right wording, sorry for that. However it took me
quite a lot of time to understand and to find out which function was
responsible for the warning in my original code, which was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80146
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80117
--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou ---
*** Bug 80146 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80117
Bug 80117 depends on bug 80146, which changed state.
Bug 80146 Summary: ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:612
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80146
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80138
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
I think that including -Wstrict-overflow in -Wall is a mistake given it is a
warning that assumes you assume signed overflow wraps and then tells you the
points where the compiler assumed otherwise.
But now
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80146
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80117
Bug 80117 depends on bug 80146, which changed state.
Bug 80146 Summary: ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:612
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80146
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80142
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80072
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This is quite impossible to reduce, after 16 hours of creduce I've reduced 22%
from the original size.
I've tried to build a testcase based on what I see in the reassociation, but
void bar (int);
unsigned lon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80072
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80072
>
> --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> This is quite impossible to reduce, after 16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80072
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That function is way too large for anything. But I'll try to get the same
ranks now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71458
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 10:33:49 2017
New Revision: 246346
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246346&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r237353
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80148
Bug ID: 80148
Summary: operand has impossible constraints
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: inline-asm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Bug 65530 depends on bug 71458, which changed state.
Bug 71458 Summary: ICE with -fsanitize=bounds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71458
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71458
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79577
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 10:38:15 2017
New Revision: 246347
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246347&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r245532
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80072
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> That function is way too large for anything. But I'll try to get the same
> ranks now.
If you have analyzed what happens you can maybe create an artificial gim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80148
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Vyukov ---
Created attachment 41016
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41016&action=edit
source code
The archive contains slub2.c that works, and slub1.c that fails with the error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79574
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 10:39:31 2017
New Revision: 246348
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246348&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r245531
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79574
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 10:41:18 2017
New Revision: 246349
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246349&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r245868
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79760
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 10:42:58 2017
New Revision: 246351
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246351&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r245870
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79803
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 10:42:33 2017
New Revision: 246350
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246350&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r245869
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79761
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 10:43:31 2017
New Revision: 246353
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246353&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r245993
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69804
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 10:43:59 2017
New Revision: 246354
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246354&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r245997
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65705
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 10:43:59 2017
New Revision: 246354
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246354&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r245997
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79631
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 10:44:58 2017
New Revision: 246355
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246355&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r245998
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65705
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 10:45:42 2017
New Revision: 246356
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246356&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r246027
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78339
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 10:46:27 2017
New Revision: 246357
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246357&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r246098
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79892
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 10:46:44 2017
New Revision: 246358
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246358&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r246120
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69804
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 10:45:42 2017
New Revision: 246356
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246356&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r246027
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79831
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 10:47:06 2017
New Revision: 246359
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246359&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r246129
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79769
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 10:47:26 2017
New Revision: 246360
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246360&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r246275
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79770
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 10:47:26 2017
New Revision: 246360
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246360&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r246275
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79753
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 10:47:52 2017
New Revision: 246361
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246361&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r246276
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79906
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 10:49:49 2017
New Revision: 246364
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246364&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r246345
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80081
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 10:49:24 2017
New Revision: 246363
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246363&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r246321
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80149
Bug ID: 80149
Summary: segfault in std::vector::resize when mixing binaries
from gcc4 and gcc5 on armhf
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80150
Bug ID: 80150
Summary: Internal compiler error when in in try_one_overload,
at cp/pt.c:18903
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80150
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80150
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
The ICE started with r233108, before that:
/home/brq/mpolacek/l.cc: In function ‘int main()’:
/home/brq/mpolacek/l.cc:16:37: error: no matching function for call to
‘compare_functions(, , int&)’
compare_f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80149
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79760
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80082
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Wed Mar 22 11:35:15 2017
New Revision: 246365
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246365&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR80082: LDRD erronously used for 64bit load on ARMv7-R
2017-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80082
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
Kn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80143
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80149
--- Comment #2 from Stefan Klug ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I assume /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++.so.6 is from GCC 5?
Yes, gcc 5 is the default compiler on the system and its libstdc++.so.6.0.21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80072
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, found a bug and its bugfix fixes the testcase, but still need to figure out
what actually was going on, if it was just that we made (correct) assumptions
that constants won't be weirdly sorted, or if ther
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79577
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 12:27:32 2017
New Revision: 246366
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246366&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r245532
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79574
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 12:28:00 2017
New Revision: 246367
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246367&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r245531
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79574
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 12:28:21 2017
New Revision: 246368
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246368&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r245868
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79803
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 12:28:50 2017
New Revision: 246369
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246369&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r245869
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79761
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 12:29:36 2017
New Revision: 246371
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246371&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r245993
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80128
--- Comment #5 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Created attachment 41019
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41019&action=edit
Possible patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79631
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 12:29:56 2017
New Revision: 246372
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246372&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r245998
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65705
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 12:30:42 2017
New Revision: 246373
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246373&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r237353,r245997,r246027
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Bac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69804
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 12:30:42 2017
New Revision: 246373
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246373&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r237353,r245997,r246027
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Bac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71458
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 12:30:42 2017
New Revision: 246373
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246373&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r237353,r245997,r246027
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Back
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79831
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 12:31:29 2017
New Revision: 246375
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246375&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r246129
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78339
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 12:31:04 2017
New Revision: 246374
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246374&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r246098
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79770
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 12:31:53 2017
New Revision: 246376
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246376&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r246275
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79769
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 12:31:53 2017
New Revision: 246376
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246376&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r246275
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79753
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 12:32:17 2017
New Revision: 246377
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246377&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r246276
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80081
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 12:32:56 2017
New Revision: 246379
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246379&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r246321
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65705
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Bug 65530 depends on bug 65705, which changed state.
Bug 65705 Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in contains_struct_check with -fsanitize=null
-fcheck-pointer-bounds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65705
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79906
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 22 12:33:33 2017
New Revision: 246380
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246380&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r246345
2017-03-22 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69804
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Bug 65530 depends on bug 69804, which changed state.
Bug 69804 Summary: [5/6] ICE with -fsanitize=undefined -fcheck-pointer-bounds
-mmpx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69804
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Bug 65530 depends on bug 78339, which changed state.
Bug 78339 Summary: -fsuggest-attribute=noreturn should not warn on
-fcheck-pointer-bounds clones
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78339
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78339
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79574
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo