https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80072
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > That function is way too large for anything. But I'll try to get the same > ranks now. If you have analyzed what happens you can maybe create an artificial gimple testcase reproducing it (given I guess only one or two reassoc chains are required in the end).
