https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79003
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Just to document, I see another Werror in LTO bootstrap:
../../gcc/predict.c: In function ‘set_even_probabilities’:
../../gcc/predict.c:798:8: error: ‘e’ may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Werror=ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79007
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc*-*-*|powerpc*-*-*, aarch64*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78899
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40458|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57583
--- Comment #11 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Ok, the patch does indeed work. Tested by compiling the offending source code
file in mednafen which currently fails to build from source [1]:
Without "-mlong-jump-table-offsets", I get:
(sid-m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57583
--- Comment #12 from Mikael Pettersson ---
Thanks for testing, I'll submit it for gcc-7 shortly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79013
Bug ID: 79013
Summary: Inconsistent auto diagnostic in member declarations
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57583
--- Comment #13 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #12)
> Thanks for testing, I'll submit it for gcc-7 shortly.
Ah, awesome, thanks! Would also be cool to have this backported to the gcc-6
branch if po
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78672
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78672
--- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Well, obviously not:
- see depends on
- run gfortran with leak check (take care not to drown in the reports) and
address those leaks.
- then do the same for the testcases themself (the work upto now
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78887
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ping, any progress?
Is the module built with -fsanitize=kernel-address? I don't see any
cpu_device_id struct in the kernel, so the message is just weird.
There is module_cpu_feature_match though which uses M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79014
Bug ID: 79014
Summary: Absent vectorization with memory loads
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78991
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 6 12:33:58 2017
New Revision: 244150
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244150&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR78991 make __gnu_cxx::__ops constructors explicit
PR libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78887
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 40471
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40471&action=edit
Preprocessed source
The command used to compile that file is:
aarch64-none-linux-gnu-gcc -Wp,-MD,a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
--- Comment #20 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hi,
it turns out that Martin added another column to his statistics script which I
have misinterpretted.
https://gcc.opensuse.org/SPEC/CINT/sb-terbium-head-64/recent.html also shows
interesting reaction
to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79015
Bug ID: 79015
Summary: ICE in get_insn_template in gcc/final.c:2081
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78991
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 6 13:20:05 2017
New Revision: 244152
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244152&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR78991 make __gnu_cxx::__ops constructors explicit
PR libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78956
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 6 13:20:10 2017
New Revision: 244153
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244153&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add deleted std::thread(const thread&&) constructor
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63829
--- Comment #8 from Richard Earnshaw ---
From a discussion on IRC:
What's the general story on lock policies?
Are environments supposed to support all three?
(if possible)
no. it's something only used in std::shared_ptr, and generally entirely
i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79003
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Jan 6 13:56:48 2017
New Revision: 244155
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244155&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix lto-bootstrap (PR bootstrap/79003).
2017-01-06 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79003
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78887
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Those options don't include -fsanitize=kernel-address, so no idea where that
earlier mentioned
_GLOBAL__sub_D_65535_0___odr_asan.__mod_cpu__cpu_feature_match_SHA1_device_table
comes from. But, even with -fsa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78887
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Those options don't include -fsanitize=kernel-address, so no idea where that
> earlier mentioned
> _GLOBAL__sub_D_65535_0___odr_asan.
> __mod_cpu__cp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79007
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc*-*-*, aarch64*, |powerpc*-*-*, aarch64*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78991
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 6 14:04:26 2017
New Revision: 244157
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244157&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR78991 make __gnu_cxx::__ops constructors explicit
PR libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78956
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 6 14:04:33 2017
New Revision: 244158
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244158&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add deleted std::thread(const thread&&) constructor
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78991
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78956
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |5.4.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78956
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78041
--- Comment #18 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: wilco
Date: Fri Jan 6 14:26:06 2017
New Revision: 244161
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244161&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
With -fpu=neon DI mode shifts are expanded after reload. DI mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78978
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Jan 6 14:33:47 2017
New Revision: 244162
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244162&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Build libgo with -Wa,-nH if possible (PR go/78978) [non-libgo parts]
l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78887
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78911
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78605
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78605
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Jan 6 15:45:42 2017
New Revision: 244164
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244164&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78605 - bogus -Wformat-length=1 with %f
gcc/testsuite/Chang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78978
--- Comment #5 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jan 6 16:04:01 2017
New Revision: 244165
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244165&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/78978
libgo: build with -Wa,-nH if possible on So
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78978
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57583
--- Comment #14 from Mikael Pettersson ---
Patch submitted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg00419.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79016
Bug ID: 79016
Summary: missing -Wstringop-overflow= overflowing allocated
buffers
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
--- Comment #21 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Jan 6 16:10:09 2017
New Revision: 244167
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244167&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/77484
* predict.def (PRED_POLYMORPHIC_CALL)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #22 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
--- Comment #24 from Renlin Li ---
Created attachment 40473
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40473&action=edit
memset.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
--- Comment #23 from Renlin Li ---
Created attachment 40472
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40472&action=edit
test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
--- Comment #25 from Renlin Li ---
Created attachment 40474
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40474&action=edit
reduced objdump assembler file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78968
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 6 17:06:24 2017
New Revision: 244169
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244169&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Check for __cxa_thread_atexit for freebsd crosses
PR libstdc++/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78911
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> Created attachment 40409 [details]
> head -n70 tc.i.274r.reload
>
> So the problem is older than r221983.
Why do you think so? Reverting r221983 one-liner, int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79006
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351
--- Comment #49 from Jon Grant ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #48)
> Send a check to Manuel ;) The feature is available under the
> -Wnull-dereference option (see comment 31). Unfortunately, due to false
> positives, the option was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78966
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78966
--- Comment #4 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Note that clang also triggers the static_assert, so there might be something
deeper going on here. :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79017
Bug ID: 79017
Summary: Old PowerMac G5, MacPorts GCC 5.4, C++11 and
"std::log2 has not been declared"
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79017
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey Walton ---
Also see Issue 53226 in the MacPorts issue tracker. "gcc5 @5.4: error:
'std::log2' has not been declared", https://trac.macports.org/ticket/53226.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78966
Richard Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78911
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
At least for me it hangs already in that r216281:
timeout 20 /opt/notnfs/gcc-bisect/obj/gcc/cc1.216281 -quiet -O3
-march=pentium-m -m32 -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-omit-frame-pointer
pr78911.c; echo $?
12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78966
Eelis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79017
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79017
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Jeffrey, could you please add the output of '/opt/local/bin/g++-mp-5
-dumpmachine' to the Target field of this bug report? Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79017
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> Jeffrey, could you please add the output of '/opt/local/bin/g++-mp-5
> -dumpmachine' to the Target field of this bug report? Thanks.
$ /opt/local/bin/g++-mp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79017
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> (In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #0)
> ... ^
>
> Because these six functions are missing we treat all C99 math functions as
> mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71905
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79017
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57583
--- Comment #15 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Jan 6 21:21:02 2017
New Revision: 244184
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244184&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-06 Mikael Pettersson
PR target/57583
* config/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57583
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71695
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Martin,
No idea what might be going on here.
Could you compile yourr testcase with "-fdump-tree-all-blocks-details -dap" on
whatever system exhibits this problem and attach the slew of debugging dumps to
th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13498
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72803
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79018
Bug ID: 79018
Summary: translatable string typo in params.def:1105
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78970
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
This change causes a regression testing glibc. glibc uses "gcc -E -x
c-header -", which now results in an error "cannot use '-' as input
filename for a precompiled header". But that use w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79017
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> ...
> > But OS X 10.5.8 is pretty old, and this might not be worth doing if it
> > doesn't affect current versio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78948
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79017
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey Walton ---
> Wow, this is a surprising statistic (for me)... OS X 10.5 makes up 29.1% of
> the MacPorts downloads. Its the largest percentage for the OS group. Confer,
> http://stats.macports.neverpanic.de/os_statisti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79017
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> (In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #0)
> > test.cxx:53:21: error: 'llrint' was not declared in this scope
> >llrint(0.0);
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351
--- Comment #50 from Martin Sebor ---
Yes, -Wnull-dereference is only in GCC 6 and later. -Wnonnull is in 5 and
prior but it does only a superficial job of checking (it only detects null
pointer constants). in GCC 7, -Wnonnull does a better job
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
--- Comment #26 from Jim Wilson ---
I can reproduce the problem with this new reduced testcase. I don't have
knowledge of all of the details how the gcc implementation of LTO works, but my
understanding goes something like this.
The testcase is
73 matches
Mail list logo
