https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78774
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Patch posted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg01053.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78606
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||7.0
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78252
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon Dec 12 17:00:37 2016
New Revision: 243566
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243566&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libiberty/
PR c++/78252
* cp-demangle.c (struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #21 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #19)
> (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #16)
> > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #15)
> > > (In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #14)
> > > > Hi Paul,
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #22 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to janus from comment #20)
> (In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #19)
> > > On thinking about it, is the specific instance of write_formatted allowed?
> >
> > I believe not. Note 7.50 of the 31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78680
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Dec 12 17:37:48 2016
New Revision: 243567
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243567&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix for PR preprocessor/78680
PR preprocessor/78680 identifies a crash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78252
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon Dec 12 17:38:53 2016
New Revision: 243568
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243568&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78252
* cp-demangle.c (struct d_print_info): Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70583
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68383
Bug 68383 depends on bug 78252, which changed state.
Bug 78252 Summary: C++ demangler crashes with infinite recursion with lambda
(auto)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78252
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78252
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70517
Bug 70517 depends on bug 78252, which changed state.
Bug 78252 Summary: C++ demangler crashes with infinite recursion with lambda
(auto)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78252
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68700
Bug 68700 depends on bug 78252, which changed state.
Bug 78252 Summary: C++ demangler crashes with infinite recursion with lambda
(auto)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78252
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78680
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78465
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Dec 12 17:46:53 2016
New Revision: 243572
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243572&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR78465 Remove runtime tests for macros
PR libstdc++/78465
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
--- Comment #18 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #17)
> I still haven't been able to reproduce this, but I do see a problem.
>
> In the original bug report, the only difference is that the code uses x4 in
> t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78647
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78647
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Dec 12 17:58:00 2016
New Revision: 243575
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243575&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78647
* c-common.c (attribute_fallthrough_p): Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78779
Bug ID: 78779
Summary: ibgcc/soft-fp/op-common.h:900: possible missing break
?
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78392
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Dec 12 18:54:54 2016
New Revision: 243580
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243580&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-12 Janus Weil
PR fortran/78392
* ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78392
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55207
Bug 55207 depends on bug 78392, which changed state.
Bug 78392 Summary: ICE in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at
fortran/trans-array.c:5979
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78392
What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68568
--- Comment #7 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Update for both backtraces :
$ gfortran-7-20161211 -finit-local-zero -c z1a.f90
z1a.f90:1:0:
subroutine s(n)
internal compiler error: in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1739
0x75c147 gf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78780
Bug ID: 78780
Summary: ICE in conv_caf_send, at
fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:1936
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78781
Bug ID: 78781
Summary: ICE in gfc_deallocate_scalar_with_status, at
fortran/trans.c:1588
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77939
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #23 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #22)
> If we are to have dynamic dispatch for UD-DTIO, where does it stop?
> Operators, user defined operators?
Not sure I understand your question. Don't we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78684
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78782
Bug ID: 78782
Summary: [x86] _mm_loadu_si64 intrinsic missing
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78783
Bug ID: 78783
Summary: gcov-tool fails in gcov_read_counter_mem
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-pro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #24 from Damian Rouson ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #21)
> (In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #19)
> > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #16)
> > > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #15)
> > > > (In reply to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70118
Allan Jensen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78780
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78783
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78781
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78772
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78622
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Dec 12 21:56:22 2016
New Revision: 243582
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243582&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78622 - -Wformat-length/-fprintf-return-value incorrect with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78622
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78766
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 12 22:01:41 2016
New Revision: 243583
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243583&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/78766
* opt-functions.awk (opt_args): Use [{] ins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78777
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 12 22:02:52 2016
New Revision: 243584
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243584&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/78777
* gimple-ssa-strength-reduction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78784
Bug ID: 78784
Summary: CRITIC BUG: Create a trash code using trash values of
registers.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78781
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78780
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78784
--- Comment #1 from RM Beer ---
ERROR 1: Use a bad register for put the each correct value for printf(),
thinking can fix if replace the bad register for other distinct
ERROR 2: Use bad the Elf32_Sym structure where get each value of all a regist
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874
Allan Jensen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linux at carewolf dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78784
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66970
Allan Jensen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linux at carewolf dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78785
Bug ID: 78785
Summary: Internal compiler error: segmentation fault - mixin
based on lambdas
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78777
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78766
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78784
--- Comment #3 from RM Beer ---
Created attachment 40315
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40315&action=edit
A single example
I can't recreate fully testcase, i get the ASM from a library object, but that
compiling in one bina
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78784
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
t.c: In function ‘main’:
t.c:12: warning: format ‘%8x’ expects type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 3 has
type ‘char *’
t.c:12: warning: format ‘%8x’ expects type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 4 has
type ‘struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57583
--- Comment #7 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Hi!
Are there any news on this issue? We're seeing this problem in both LibreOffice
[1] (yes, *that* LibreOffice) and Mednafen [2].
Adrian
> [1]
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78785
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40233|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70583
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2016-12-12, at 12:40 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I've never seen it on x86_64, nor can't find it in gcc-testresults archives.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2016-12/msg00968
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71496
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Tue Dec 13 01:10:33 2016
New Revision: 243590
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243590&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Darwin,PPC] Back-port fix for PR71496.
gcc/
2016-12-13 Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78775
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner ---
Created attachment 40317
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40317&action=edit
Potential fix to spe.md
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #2)
> So we're hitting this code in lra-assigns
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78786
Bug ID: 78786
Summary: GCC hangs/out of memory calling sprintf with large
precision
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78786
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78787
Bug ID: 78787
Summary: O Color, Where Art Thou? (with -flto)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78787
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66488
--- Comment #14 from Stanisław Halik ---
Jakub, thank you for changing the minutiae of the patch when I was unable to.
This can be marked resolved fixed now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78776
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69481
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18206
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78761
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 13 06:16:05 2016
New Revision: 243593
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243593&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78761
* cp-demangle.c (cplus_demangle_type): Demang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78761
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 13 06:20:44 2016
New Revision: 243594
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243594&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78761
* cp-demangle.c (cplus_demangle_type): Demang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78761
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 6.3+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909
--- Comment #41 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #40)
> Created attachment 40316 [details]
> infinite d_print_comp printing protection
>
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #39)
> > Mark, could you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78778
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78778
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Atomic/GCCMM/DataRaces
"GCC is currently not going to invest the time, effort, and required code
obfuscation to prevent speculative loads until such hardware exists."
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78773
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Actually constexpr won't work here as you have a cast from an integer to a
pointer ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78773
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jpakkane at gmail dot com
--- Comment #30
101 - 176 of 176 matches
Mail list logo