https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909
Mark Wielaard <mark at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #40233|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #40 from Mark Wielaard <mark at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 40316
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40316&action=edit
infinite d_print_comp printing protection
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #39)
> Mark, could you please post your path to gcc-patches?
> Then there might be a chance to get it into binutils before 2.28 gets
> released.
I did rewrite the patch a little to remove the const arguments, add just the
testcases it fixes and allow up to 2 levels of recursion. That is attached.
But I still haven't figured out why we need to allow 2 levels of recursion for
some of the cases. See the XXX in the patch. I don't feel I can propose this
unless we figure out why the level needs to be 2 (and not 3 or...)
If we figure that out we should add the explanation to the comment. Then we can
propose it on gcc-patches.
