https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78725
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78696
--- Comment #14 from James Greenhalgh ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #13)
> Created attachment 40272 [details]
> Lightly tested patch.
>
> (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #6)
>
> After some more testing, although the patch I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78750
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Reduced:
extern "C" char *strcpy (char *, const char *);
void
fn (char *p, char &as)
{
strcpy (p, &as);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78750
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78752
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78753
Bug ID: 78753
Summary: non-ambiguous overload resolution with function
template partial ordering rules
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78550
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Dec 9 14:04:53 2016
New Revision: 243484
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243484&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78550
* convert.c (convert_to_integer_1): Maybe f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78593
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Fri Dec 9 14:06:47 2016
New Revision: 243485
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243485&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-09 Janus Weil
Backport from trunk
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78696
--- Comment #15 from James Greenhalgh ---
(In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #14)
> Did you accidentally commit it as part of r243419? I don't see the changes
> marked in your ChangeLog, nor did you tag that revision as a fix for this
> b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78550
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78593
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78749
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner ---
So we're hitting this code in lra-assigns.c:lra_assign():1612:
if (flag_checking && !flag_ipa_ra)
for (i = FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; i < max_regno; i++)
if (lra_reg_info[i].nrefs != 0 && reg_renumbe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78733
--- Comment #12 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: wilco
Date: Fri Dec 9 14:26:07 2016
New Revision: 243486
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243486&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add the test this time...
PR target/78733
* gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70321
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So shall we still consider moving 32-bit stv pass before the combiner instead
of after it? The argument about andn is no longer relevant, we have a
one_cmpldi3_doubleword pattern now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #4)
> Looking at the dump, one probably needs a polymorphic reference to
> 'a->_vptr->write_formatted' instead of using the interface?
Btw, such wrong-code behavior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72861
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78027
--- Comment #4 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Dec 9 14:45:54 2016
New Revision: 243488
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243488&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/78027
gcc/
* ipa-icf.c (sem_func
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78754
Bug ID: 78754
Summary: incorrectly accepts non-deductible template parameter
pack in function template
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78740
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt ---
I think the target restriction
/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc*-*-* && ilp32 } } } */
is probably sufficient to fix this. I can test that in a bit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78749
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
It's tempting to write just
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c
@@ -922,11 +922,12 @@ wrapup_globals_for_namespace (tree name_space, void* data
ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
unsigned int i;
FOR_EACH_VE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78740
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Since the test doesn't have a { dg-do ... }, I don't know whether you were
intending compile-only or an executable test. Use { dg-do run { target ... } }
as needed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78696
--- Comment #16 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #15)
> (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #14)
> > Did you accidentally commit it as part of r243419? I don't see the changes
> > marked in your ChangeLog, n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78740
--- Comment #5 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #4)
> Since the test doesn't have a { dg-do ... }, I don't know whether you were
> intending compile-only or an executable test. Use { dg-do run { target ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78740
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77933
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Fri Dec 9 15:26:17 2016
New Revision: 243490
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243490&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-09 Thomas Preud'homme
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78751
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78740
--- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt ---
Yes, that works:
Running
/home/wschmidt/gcc/gcc-mainline-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/powerpc.exp
...
=== gcc Summary for unix/-m64 ===
# of unsupported tests 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25733
--- Comment #13 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
Another example:
int f1 (int a, int b, int c, int d)
{
if (a = c && b == d)
return 0;
else
return 1;
}
int f2 (int a, int b, int c, int d)
{
if (a == b || (a = c && b == d))
return 0;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72861
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61636
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78748
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72742
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68903
--- Comment #1 from trzeci ---
Created attachment 40290
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40290&action=edit
simpler testcase
should output: 3 3 3
usually outputs: 3 3 0
C::c remains uninitialized after construction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78731
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78748
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Started with r239685.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255
--- Comment #12 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: avieira
Date: Fri Dec 9 16:46:42 2016
New Revision: 243494
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243494&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR78255: Make postreload aware of NO_FUNCTION_CSE
gcc/Chan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78755
Bug ID: 78755
Summary: Thread sanitizer reports race with std::promise with
-O0, works with -O{1,2,3}
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78755
--- Comment #1 from Csaba Ráduly ---
Created attachment 40291
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40291&action=edit
Preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78756
Bug ID: 78756
Summary: Missing prefix in the name of gfortran.info
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: boots
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78748
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40292
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40292&action=edit
gcc7-pr78748.patch
Untested fix (though, I don't have a quick setup to bootstrap/regtest it in the
next week or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255
--- Comment #13 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: avieira
Date: Fri Dec 9 17:22:20 2016
New Revision: 243496
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243496&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR78255: Make postreload aware of NO_FUNCTION_CSE
gcc/Chan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm aarch64 |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70321
--- Comment #14 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> So shall we still consider moving 32-bit stv pass before the combiner
> instead of after it? The argument about andn is no longer relevant, we have
> a one_cmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26500
Mojca Miklavec changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mojca at macports dot org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78750
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Dec 9 19:05:28 2016
New Revision: 243498
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243498&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78750
* builtins.c (check_sizes): Use POI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78750
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78680
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78683
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Dec 9 19:31:06 2016
New Revision: 243499
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243499&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: clz/ctz/ffs improvement (PR78683)
On CPUs that implement po
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72742
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 9 19:35:18 2016
New Revision: 243500
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243500&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/72742
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (*and3_imm_mask_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78721
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Fri Dec 9 19:47:10 2016
New Revision: 243501
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243501&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-12-09 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72742
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78757
Bug ID: 78757
Summary: ICE with function returning a pointer to a character
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78758
Bug ID: 78758
Summary: [7 Regression] Warning: '__builtin_memcpy' ...
overflows the destination for string assignment
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78758
--- Comment #1 from Harald Anlauf ---
Slightly reduced variant:
integer function get_satid (name)
character(len=*), intent(in) :: name
character(len=16):: longname
integer, external:: satid_longname
! longname(1:)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78740
--- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Dec 9 22:02:04 2016
New Revision: 243506
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243506&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-09 Bill Schmidt
PR testsuite/78740
* gcc.tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78740
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78758
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78759
Bug ID: 78759
Summary: __gcc_qadd could have been "more commutative" when a+c
is infinity, but a+c+aa+cc is not
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77903
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Dec 9 22:25:26 2016
New Revision: 243507
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243507&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-09 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/77903
* decl.c (get_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77903
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78758
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59781
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0
Summary|[5/6/7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #6 from Damian Rouson ---
Janus, thanks for your additional investigation and comments.
Jerry, below is a better example in which I extend the abstract type and
implement the deferred binding in the non-abstract child type but invoke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78760
Bug ID: 78760
Summary: strcpy buffer overflow not diagnosed with
-Wstringop-overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70863
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Slightly reduced test case:
module b_module
implicit none
type :: b
character(len=4) :: name = "none"
contains
final :: destroy_b
end type
contains
impure elemental subroutine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70863
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> related to/duplicate of pr69298?
Yes, I think it's the same problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71112
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78761
Bug ID: 78761
Summary: C++14, compiler generate mangled name that can not be
demangled
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
101 - 171 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
