https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78696
--- Comment #16 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #15) > (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #14) > > Did you accidentally commit it as part of r243419? I don't see the changes > > marked in your ChangeLog, nor did you tag that revision as a fix for this > > bug, but the code above has found its way in to trunk, and so the failures > > I've been seeing with our code base have been fixed. > > I take that back, it is the fix in comment #6 that I see in tree, not the > expanded fix from comment #13. I think that hunk was indeed accidental (though benign). I wondered where it came from myself just last night as I was rebasing my patch on top of the top of trunk.
