https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77749
Bug ID: 77749
Summary: [7 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77745
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77740
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77750
Bug ID: 77750
Summary: gcc build not working with -O0
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77749
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77740
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Minimal test-case:
char *MSVCRT__ecvt_data_0;
void foo()
{
__builtin_snprintf (MSVCRT__ecvt_data_0, 0, "%.*le");
}
On x86_64-linux-gnu, minimal command line causing the ICE:
$ gcc pr77740.i -Wformat
pr77
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77750
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Comment on attachment 39694
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39694
Possible patch (correctly formatted magic "fall through" comments)
>Index: gcc/combine.c
>==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77750
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77749
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77749
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |7.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77751
Bug ID: 77751
Summary: [7 regression] cc1plus: error: unrecognized command
line option "-Wno-implicit-fallthrough" for
insn-emit.o
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77750
--- Comment #3 from louis.krupp at zoho dot com ---
I agree. But in the interests of reporting the bug and proposing a patch as
soon as possible, I decided to minimize the risk of unintended consequences by
keeping things as simple as I could.
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77751
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh yes older gcc complain about non-existent negative warning options.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77666
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 27 07:52:28 2016
New Revision: 240522
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240522&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/77666
* trans-openmp.c (gfc_omp_private_outer_r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77752
Bug ID: 77752
Summary: ICE on C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler
error: Segmentation fault, build_list_conv,
implicit_conversion)
Product: gcc
Versio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77751
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77748
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77748
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger ---
I think the problem is that tree libstdc++ functions are called,
but the basic_string structure has been c-reduced.
Especially _Alloc_hider, but when that is removed the test
case does no longer reproduce th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77753
Bug ID: 77753
Summary: [7 Regression] broken profiledbootstrap due to
-Werror=format-length in varasm.c:1573
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77754
Bug ID: 77754
Summary: internal compiler error : tree code 'call_expr' is not
supported in LTO streams
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77752
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27077
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Please see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#need for the things that
are required for a bug report.
Specifically,
the preprocessed file (*.i*) that triggers the bug, generated by adding
-save-temps to the complet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77754
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
;; Function void std::function<_Res(_ArgTypes
...)>::swap(std::function<_Res(_ArgTypes ...)>&) [with _Res = void; _ArgTypes =
{}] (null)
;; enabled by -tree-original
<<< Unknown tree: must_not_throw_expr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Index: libstdc++-v3/include/std/functional
===
--- libstdc++-v3/include/std/functional (revision 240521)
+++ libstdc++-v3/include/std/function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77754
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77751
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77748
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab ---
On m68k it crashes here:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
__GI_memcmp (s1=0x0, s2=0x0, len=2285895680) at memcmp.c:333
333 memcmp.c: No such file or directory.
(gdb) up
#1 0x893
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77746
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Fuka ---
Indeed, 4.9 crashes as well, my first description is incorrect. It was running
well in 4.8.5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12)
> Index: libstdc++-v3/include/std/functional
> ===
> --- libstdc++-v3/include/std/functional (r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77749
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Sep 27 10:04:39 2016
New Revision: 240524
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240524&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove __gcov_merge_delta (PR bootstrap/77749)
PR bootstrap/77749
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77749
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Just to explain a little bit. Consider
void foo (void)
{
union { float f; char c[4]; } u, v;
*(int *)&u = 0;
v = u;
return *(int *)&v;
}
then C11 6.5/6,7 make it clear that it is not valid to use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, what I fail to find is sth in the (C) standard that specifies the
semantics of an aggregate assignment of union type. Thus I interpret it to use
the
effective type of the object (determined by the las
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27077
--- Comment #10 from Helmut Schellong ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #9)
> Please see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#need for the things that
> are required for a bug report.
>
> Specifically,
>
> the preprocessed file (*.i*) that trig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77754
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|lto |c
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77751
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Sep 27 10:40:37 2016
New Revision: 240526
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240526&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/77751
* Makefile.in (insn-attrtab.o-warn,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77754
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77753
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77754
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Monat ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> I wonder what the standards say about side-effects in those "declarations".
From my instance of ISO+IEC+9899-2011.pdf
6.7.6.2 Array declarators
Constraints
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77436
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 27 10:54:00 2016
New Revision: 240527
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240527&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-27 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77679
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 27 10:54:00 2016
New Revision: 240527
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240527&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-27 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77450
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 27 10:54:00 2016
New Revision: 240527
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240527&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-27 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77544
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 27 10:54:00 2016
New Revision: 240527
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240527&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-27 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77605
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 27 10:54:00 2016
New Revision: 240527
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240527&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-27 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77514
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 27 10:54:00 2016
New Revision: 240527
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240527&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-27 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77544
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77514
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77679
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16855
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Sep 27 11:07:11 2016
New Revision: 240529
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240529&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcov: dump in a static dtor instead of in an atexit handler
PR gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7970
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Sep 27 11:07:11 2016
New Revision: 240529
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240529&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcov: dump in a static dtor instead of in an atexit handler
PR gco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44779
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Sep 27 11:07:11 2016
New Revision: 240529
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240529&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcov: dump in a static dtor instead of in an atexit handler
PR gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7970
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44779
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77748
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger ---
This avoids also the _Alloc_hider constructor.
But it still reproduces with gcc-6 and gcc-7.
I have found no way to add __attribute((noinline, noclone))
to the template specialization, that works.
So I did
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77478
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 27 11:27:54 2016
New Revision: 240530
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240530&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-27 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/77478
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77478
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 27 11:29:28 2016
New Revision: 240531
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240531&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-27 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/77478
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77748
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab ---
That change also makes it run successfully.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
For C++ 12.8 [class.copy] says:
-16- The implicitly-defined copy/move constructor for a union X copies the
object representation (3.9) of X.
and
-29- The implicitly-defined copy assignment operator fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14)
> Just to explain a little bit. Consider
>
> void foo (void)
> {
> union { float f; char c[4]; } u, v;
> *(int *)&u = 0;
> v = u;
> return *(int *)&v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459
Georg Koppen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Started with r225465.
Something to do with alignment.
I wonder if it's related to PR69841 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
>
> --- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77478
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77478
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 27 12:44:42 2016
New Revision: 240532
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240532&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-27 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/77478
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #88 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue Sep 27 12:50:27 2016
New Revision: 240533
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240533&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/51244
* config/sh/sh.c (sh_rtx_costs): Fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77755
Bug ID: 77755
Summary: [concepts] Abbreviatd function template pack
expansions not working
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It's 2016, how can snprintf not be supported still?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77745
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 27 12:56:38 2016
New Revision: 240534
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240534&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-27 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/77745
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77745
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0
Summary|[5/6/7 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77751
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77745
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.4
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77756
Bug ID: 77756
Summary: cpuid
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: inline-asm
Assignee: unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459
--- Comment #3 from Georg Koppen ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> It's 2016, how can snprintf not be supported still?
I asked about that problem in #mingw-w64 a while ago and got the following
answer:
M$ does not provide `snp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Does this help?
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/debug.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/debug.cc
@@ -540,10 +540,25 @@ namespace
using _Error_formatter = __gnu_debug::_Error_formatter;
using _Parameter =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46266
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46266
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Sep 27 13:22:04 2016
New Revision: 240536
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240536&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR gcov-profile/46266
PR gcov-profile/46266
* lib/gco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77757
Bug ID: 77757
Summary: mips16: generated assembly has loads too far away
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77748
--- Comment #9 from Christophe Lyon ---
Did you try on arm-none-eabi too?
It does not seem to work for me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77748
--- Comment #10 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #9)
> Did you try on arm-none-eabi too?
> It does not seem to work for me.
Hmmm, I don't have the exact environment, but
I used your .s file, removed the abi lines
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77748
--- Comment #12 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 39699
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39699&action=edit
assembler-v2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77748
--- Comment #13 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 39700
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39700&action=edit
qemu trace v2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77748
--- Comment #14 from Christophe Lyon ---
I've attached the "v2" version of the .ii, .s and trace files.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77751
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #5 from Gerald Pfe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77748
--- Comment #11 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 39698
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39698&action=edit
preprocessed-v2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77718
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt ---
So something like this maybe?
Index: builtins.c
===
--- builtins.c (revision 240511)
+++ builtins.c (working copy)
@@ -3707,11 +3707,13 @@ ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77677
--- Comment #12 from Pat Haugen ---
(In reply to kugan from comment #11)
> 2016-09-27 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
>
> PR ipa/77677
> * ipa-prop.c (ipa_compute_jump_functions_for_edge): Use
> extract_range_from_unary_expr to conve
*)
../../src/gcc/function.c:5207
0x465243 execute
../../src/gcc/cfgexpand.c:6225
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See for instructions.
With g++ 7.0.0 20160927 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77758
Bug ID: 77758
Summary: OpenMP sections: intermittent incorrect behavior in
reduction
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77760
Bug ID: 77760
Summary: get_time needs to set tm_wday amd tm_yday
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77742
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27077
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
> In this case a lot of informations are not necessary.
Those bug reporting guidelines are there for a reason:
To make it easier for developers (whose time is very
limited) to quickly reproduce bugs.
Witho
-prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-240535-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-nographite-amd64
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160927 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77718
--- Comment #5 from Aaron Sawdey ---
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 14:30 +, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77718
>
> --- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt ---
> So something like this maybe?
>
> Index:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77762
Bug ID: 77762
Summary: Incorrect destination buffer length in -Wformat-length
warning
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77763
Bug ID: 77763
Summary: ICE in parse_struct_map, at fortran/parse.c:3064
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77764
Bug ID: 77764
Summary: ICE in is_anonymous_component, at
fortran/interface.c:450
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77683
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerald at pfeifer dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77740
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
