https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77745
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Mine. I believe the testcase is valid. If c1 == c2 you can use p1 to access
the object at p3 as p1 == p3.
Both FRE and DSE remove the store but FRE removes the wrong one. I thought I
had fixed this one... (DOM contains similar code but it doesn't remove either).
